2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery—results of a prospective randomized trial

2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery—results of a prospective randomized trial Langenbecks Arch Surg (2017) 402:1241–1253 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1629-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery—results of a prospective randomized trial 1 1 2 3 Alexander Buia & Florian Stockhausen & Natalie Filmann & Ernst Hanisch Received: 10 December 2016 /Accepted: 28 September 2017 /Published online: 6 October 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract procedures in the 2D and 3D groups did not differ. Overall, the Purpose 3D imaging is an upcoming technology in laparo- Raw NASA Workload TLX showed no significance between scopic surgery, and recent studies have shown that the modern the groups. 3D technique is superior in an experimental setting. However, Conclusion 3D imaging could be a possible advantage in lap- the first randomized controlled clinical trial in this context aroscopic surgery. The results of our clinical trial show in- dates back to 1998 and showed no significant difference be- creased personal felt safety and efficiency of the surgeon using tween 2D and 3D visualization using the first 3D generation a 3D imaging system. Overall of the procedures, the findings technique, which is now more than 15 years old. assessed using Likert scales in terms of own felt safety and Methods Positive results measured in an experimental http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Springer Journals

2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery—results of a prospective randomized trial

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/2d-vs-3d-imaging-in-laparoscopic-surgery-results-of-a-prospective-Dq1go7EWVx
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; General Surgery; Abdominal Surgery; Cardiac Surgery; Thoracic Surgery; Traumatic Surgery; Vascular Surgery
ISSN
1435-2443
eISSN
1435-2451
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00423-017-1629-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Langenbecks Arch Surg (2017) 402:1241–1253 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1629-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery—results of a prospective randomized trial 1 1 2 3 Alexander Buia & Florian Stockhausen & Natalie Filmann & Ernst Hanisch Received: 10 December 2016 /Accepted: 28 September 2017 /Published online: 6 October 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract procedures in the 2D and 3D groups did not differ. Overall, the Purpose 3D imaging is an upcoming technology in laparo- Raw NASA Workload TLX showed no significance between scopic surgery, and recent studies have shown that the modern the groups. 3D technique is superior in an experimental setting. However, Conclusion 3D imaging could be a possible advantage in lap- the first randomized controlled clinical trial in this context aroscopic surgery. The results of our clinical trial show in- dates back to 1998 and showed no significant difference be- creased personal felt safety and efficiency of the surgeon using tween 2D and 3D visualization using the first 3D generation a 3D imaging system. Overall of the procedures, the findings technique, which is now more than 15 years old. assessed using Likert scales in terms of own felt safety and Methods Positive results measured in an experimental

Journal

Langenbeck's Archives of SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Oct 6, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off