Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ironically, it is the RCN, whose leaders COHSE members caricatured as "sherry sipping, middle-class women . . . complete with Mrin [sweater) set and pearls" (p. f OS), which emerges as the more skillful tactician and organizer in the struggle. Hart suggescs that its image as an organization *for nurses only" made it easier for the RCN to accommodate the new order. COHSE, on the other hand, had not only ta consider irs registered nurse members but its enrolled nurse and ancillary health care membership as well: Unfortunately, what benefited one group was often disadvantageous to the others. The RCN's reward for its flexibility was a much expanded membership. COHSE's accompanying decline in its nursing ranks had much to do, Hart argues, with the organization's 1996 decision to join forces with two large trade unions. As noted, Hart is a regional officer of UNISON and one might expect him to have access to COHSE's records and use them in his study. Unfortunately, his work is based primarily on secondary literature, and the major original sources are articles from RCN and COHSE newspapers. Without primary sources, Hart cannoc and does not offer a complete history of nurses' trade unions and
Nursing History Review – Springer Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.