Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. El-Faki, N. Zhang, D. Peterson (2000)
Factors affecting color-based weed detection.Transactions of the ASABE, 43
M. S. El-Faki, N. Zhang, D. E. Peterson (2000)
Weed detection using color machine visionTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 43
T. Borregaard, H. Nielsen, L. Nørgaard, H. Have (2000)
Crop–weed Discrimination by Line Imaging SpectroscopyJournal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 75
T. Burks, S. Shearer, F. Payne (2000)
CLASSIFICATION OF WEED SPECIES USING COLOR TEXTURE FEATURES AND DISCRIMINANT ANALYSISTransactions of the ASABE, 43
P. Pollet, F. Feyaerts, P. Wambacq, L. Van Gool (1998)
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Precision Agriculture
Lie Tang, L. Tian, B. Steward (2000)
COLOR IMAGE SEGMENTATION WITHGENETIC ALGORITHM FOR IN-FIELD WEED SENSING
J. F. Favier, D. W. Ross, R. Tsheko, D. D. Kennedy, A. Y. Muir, J. Fleming (1999)
Proceedings of SPIE 3543—Precision Agriculture and Biological Quality
(1996)
Untersuchungen der Voraussetzungen für den teilflächenspezifischen chemischen Pflanzenschutz
F. Feyaerts, P. Pollet, L. Gool, P. Wambacq (1998)
Sensor for Weed Detection Based on Spectral MeasurementsPrecision Agriculture
Daniel Guyer, G. Miles, M. Schreiber, O. Mitchell, V. Vanderbilt (1986)
MACHINE VISION AND IMAGE PROCESSING FOR PLANT IDENTIFICATION.Transactions of the ASABE, 29
M. S. El-Faki, N. Zhang, D. E. Peterson (2000)
Factors affecting color-based weed detectionTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 43
M. El-Faki, N. Zhang, D. Peterson (2000)
WEED DETECTION USING COLOR MACHINE VISIONTransactions of the ASABE, 43
D. Moshou, Bart Keteiaere, E. Vrindts, P. Kennes, J. Baerdemaeker, H. Ramon (1998)
Local Linear Mapping Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition of PlantsIFAC Proceedings Volumes, 31
H. Gausman, W. Allen, C. Wiegand, D. Escobar, R. Rodríguez, A. Richardson (1978)
The Leaf Mesophylls of Twenty Crops, Their Light Spectra, and Optical and Geometrical Parameters
G. Murray (1977)
A Cautionary Note on Selection of Variables in Discriminant AnalysisJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series C-applied Statistics, 26
(1993)
Weed-crop discrimination by optical reflectance
(1997)
Optical discrimination of crop, weed and soil for on-line weed detection
H. Walters, W. Koch (1980)
Light reflectance characteristics of weed and crop leaves as affected by plant species and herbicides.
(1997)
The importance of patch mapping resolution for sprayer control
N. Chaisattapagon (1995)
Effective criteria for weed identification in wheat fields using machine visionTransactions of the ASABE, 38
J. Favier, David Ross, R. Tsheko, Duncan Kennedy, A. Muir, J. Fleming (1999)
Discrimination of weeds in brassica crops using optical spectral reflectance and leaf texture analysis, 3543
E. Franz, M. Gebhardt, K. Unklesbay (1995)
Algorithms for Extracting Leaf Boundary Information from Digital Images of Plant FoliageTransactions of the ASABE, 38
(1989)
SAS/Stat* User’s Guide, Version 6, Fourth edition, vol
T. Burks, S. Shearer, R. Gates, K. Donohue (2000)
BACKPROPAGATION NEURAL NETWORK DESIGN AND EVALUATION FOR CLASSIFYING WEED SPECIES USING COLOR IMAGE TEXTURETransactions of the ASABE, 43
M. J. Kropff (1988)
Modelling the effects of weeds on crop productionWeed Research, 28
T. F. Burks, S. A. Shearer, F. A. Payne (2000)
Classification of weed species using color texture features and discriminant analysisTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 43
R. Cousens, P. Brain, J. O’Donovan, P. O'sullivan (1987)
The use of Biologically Realistic Equations to Describe the Effects of Weed Density and Relative Time of Emergence on Crop YieldWeed Science, 35
T. F. Burks, S. A. Shearer, R. S. Gates, K. D. Donohue (2000)
Backpropagation neural network design and evaluation for classifying weed species using color image textureTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 43
P. Pollet, F. Feyaerts, P. Wambacq, L. Gool (1998)
Weed detection based on structural information using an imaging spectrograph
W. Donald (1994)
Geostatistics for Mapping Weeds, with a Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Patch as a Case StudyWeed Science, 42
L. Tian, D. Slaughter, R. Norris (1997)
MACHINE VISION IDENTIFICATION OF TOMATO SEEDLINGS FOR AUTOMATED WEED CONTROL
M. Kropff (1988)
Modelling the effects of weeds on crop productionNetherlands Journal of Agricultural Science
D. E. Guyer, G. E. Miles, M. M. Schreiber, O. R. Mitchell, V. C. Vanderbilt (1986)
Machine vision and image processing for plant identificationTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 29
H. Gausman (1985)
Plant Leaf Optical Properties in Visible and Near-Infrared Light
D. Woebbecke, G. Meyer, K. Bargen, D. Mortensen (1994)
Shape features for identifying young weeds using image analysisTransactions of the ASABE, 38
(1998)
Classifying daylight conditions from colour histogram assessment
For site-specific application of herbicides, automatic detection and evaluation of weeds is desirable. Since reflectance of crop, weeds and soil differs in the visual and near infrared wavelengths, there is potential for using reflection measurements at different wavelengths to distinguish between them. Reflectance spectra of crop and weed canopies were used to evaluate the possibilities of weed detection with reflection measurements in laboratory circumstances. Sugarbeet and maize and 7 weed species were included in the measurements. Classification into crop and weeds was possible in laboratory tests, using a limited number of wavelength band ratios. Crop and weed spectra could be separated with more than 97% correct classification. Field measurements of crop and weed reflection were conducted for testing spectral weed detection. Canopy reflection was measured with a line spectrograph in the wavelength range from 480 to 820 nm (visual to near infrared) with ambient light. The discriminant model uses a limited number of narrow wavelength bands. Over 90% of crop and weed spectra can be identified correctly, when the discriminant model is specific to the prevailing light conditions.
Precision Agriculture – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 8, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.