Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
CB Cazden, SW Beck (2003)
Handbook of discourse processes
E Baldinger, N Louie (2016)
TRU mathematics conversation guide: A tool for teacher learning and growth (mathematics version)
(1986)
Handbook of research on teaching
(2008)
Handbook of international research in mathematics education
(2018)
On target
AH Schoenfeld, RE Floden, F El Chidiac, D Gillingham, H Fink, S Hu, A Sayavedra, A Weltman, A Zarkh (2018)
On classroom observations
AH Schoenfeld (2014)
What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them?Educational Researcher, 43
(2007)
Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning
(2009)
The Moore method: A pathway to learner-centered instruction
T Beeby, H Burkhardt, R Caddy (1980)
SCAN: Systematic classroom analysis notation for mathematics lessons
AH Schoenfeld (2016)
The teaching for robust understanding (TRU) observation guide for mathematics: A tool for teachers, coaches, administrators, and professional learning communities
H Mehan (1985)
Handbook of discourse analysis, volume 3: Discourse and dialogue
RA Engle (2011)
Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning
MS Gresalfi, P Cobb (2006)
Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equityPedagogies: An International Journal, 1
AH Schoenfeld (2016)
On target: A TRU guide
(1991)
Toward a general theory of expertise
(1996)
Handbook of research on teacher education
(2011)
PLATO (protocol for language arts teaching observations)
R Pianta, K Paro, BK Hamre (2008)
Classroom assessment scoring system
EG Cohen (1994)
Designing groupwork: Strategies for heterogeneous classrooms (revised edition)
AH Schoenfeld (2010)
How we think
AH Schoenfeld, RE Floden (2015)
TRU mathematics scoring guide version alpha
(1997)
Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice
AH Schoenfeld (2013)
Classroom observations in theory and practiceZDM-The International Journal Of Mathematics Education, 45
This paper provides an overview of the teaching for robust understanding (TRU) Framework, its origins, and its evolving use. The core assertion underlying the TRU Framework is that there are five dimensions of activities along which a classroom must do well, if students are to emerge from that classroom being knowledgeable and resourceful disciplinary thinkers and problem solvers. The main focus of TRU is not on what the teacher does, but on the opportunities the environment affords students for deep engagement with mathematical content. This paper’s use of the TRU framework to highlight salient aspects of three classroom videos affords a compare-and-contrast with other analytic frameworks, highlighting the importance of both the focus on student experience and the mathematics-specific character of the analysis. This is also the first paper on the framework that introduces a family of TRU-related tools for purposes of professional development.
ZDM – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 4, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.