Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Cockburn, R. Henderson (2003)
Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug DiscoveryJournal of Industrial Economics, 46
D. Watts, S. Strogatz (1998)
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networksNature, 393
M. Newman (2004)
Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's lawContemporary Physics, 46
A. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg (2002)
Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy
(2002)
The Innovation SuperHighway: Harnessing Intellectual Capital for Collaborative
Rob Cross, Andrew Parker, Lisa Sasson (2003)
Networks in the knowledge economy
A. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg, M. Fogarty (2000)
THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors
Z. Griliches (1990)
Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey
Bronwyn Hall, A. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg (2005)
Market value and patent citationsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 36
(2006)
Scale Free Innovation Networks: Applications to Technology Clusters and Patenting Processes
M. Newman (2004)
1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks
L. Hesselman (2003)
Patents, Citations and Innovations: A window on the knowledge economy, Jaffee, A.B. and Trajtenberg, M.
Holger Ebel, Lutz-Ingo Mielsch, S. Bornholdt (2002)
Scale-free topology of e-mail networks.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 66 3 Pt 2A
Alessandro Vespignani (2004)
Evolution of Networks-From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW S N Dorogovtsev and J F F Mendes
M. Porter (1998)
Clusters and the new economics of competition.Harvard business review, 76 6
Wesley Cohen, S. Merrill (2003)
Patents in the knowledge-based economy
K. Börner, Jeegar Maru, Robert Goldstone (2003)
The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101
(2002)
The Innovation SuperHighway: Harnessing Intellectual Capital for Collaborative Advantage
J. Lanjouw, Mark Schankerman (2004)
Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple IndicatorsIO: Productivity
J. Abello, P. Pardalos, M. Resende (2002)
Handbook of Massive Data Sets
S. Dorogovtsev, J. Mendes (2003)
Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW (Physics)
M. Faloutsos, P. Faloutsos, C. Faloutsos (1999)
On power-law relationships of the Internet topology
D. Skyrme (1999)
Knowledge Networking: Creating the Collaborative Enterprise
R. Albert, Hawoong Jeong, A. Barabási (1999)
Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide WebNature, 401
M. Newman (2003)
The Structure and Function of Complex NetworksSIAM Rev., 45
A. Barabási, Hawoong Jeong, Z. Néda, E. Ravasz, A. Schubert, T. Vicsek (2001)
Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborationsPhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 311
L. Amaral, Antonio Scala, M. Barthelemy, H. Stanley (2000)
Classes of small-world networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97 21
R. Albert, A. Barabási (2001)
Statistical mechanics of complex networksArXiv, cond-mat/0106096
T. Brantle, M. Fallah, W. Howe (2007)
Complex Innovation Networks, Patent Citations and Power LawsPICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology
A. Chandler, A. Saxenian (1994)
Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128The New England Quarterly, 68
B. McInnes, Jannene McBride, N. Evans, David Lambert, A. Andrew (1999)
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
A. Frieze (2006)
Random graphs
W. Aiello, F. Graham, Linyuan Lu (2001)
Random evolution in massive graphsProceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing
[Knowledge and innovation flows as characterized by the network of invention collaboration is studied, its scale free power law properties are examined and its importance to understanding technological advancement. This research while traditionally investigated via statistical analysis may be further examined via complex networks. It is demonstrated that the invention collaboration network’s degree distribution may be characterized by a power law, where the probability that an inventor (collaborator) is highly connected is statistically more likely than would be expected via random connections and associations, with the network’s properties determined by a relatively small number of highly connected inventors (collaborators) known as hubs. Potential areas of application are suggested.]
Published: May 31, 2010
Keywords: Bipartite Graph; Degree Distribution; Patent Citation; Real World Network; Innovation Network
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.