Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. L. Day, P. L. Richards, R. P. Brooks (1997)
Chesapeake riparian forest buffer inventory
P. Angermeier, J. Karr (1994)
Biological Integrity versus Biological Diversity as Policy DirectivesProtecting biotic resourcesBioScience, 44
T. O’Connell, L. Jackson, R. Brooks (1998)
A Bird Community Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic HighlandsEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51
(1992)
Atlas of breeding birds in Pennsylvania
R. Noss (1990)
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical ApproachConservation Biology, 4
J. J. Messer (1992)
Ecological indicators, Proc. Int. Symp. Ecological Indicators, 16–19 October 1990, Fort Lauderdale, FL
R. Smith, A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, M. Brinson (1995)
An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices; [computer file] /; by R. Daniel Smith ... [et al.] ; prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Mary Croonquist, R. Brooks (1993)
Effects of habitat disturbance on bird communities in riparian corridorsJournal of Soil and Water Conservation, 48
M. M. Brinson (1993)
Changes in the functioning of wetland along environmental gradientsWetlands, 13
W. Lewis (1995)
Wetlands : Characteristics and Boundaries
Mary Croonquist, R. Brooks (1991)
Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areasEnvironmental Management, 15
P. R. Adamus, K. Brandt (1990)
Impacts on quality of inland wetlands of the United States: A survey of indicators, techniques, and application of community-level biomonitoring data
D. Wardrop, R. Brooks (1998)
The Occurrence and Impact of Sedimentation in Central Pennsylvania WetlandsEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51
B. Sweeney (1992)
Streamside Forests and the Physical, Chemical, and Trophic Characteristics of Piedmont Streams in Eastern North AmericaWater Science and Technology, 26
R. P. Brooks, M. J. Croonquist (1990)
Wetland, habitat, and trophic response guilds for wildlife species in PennsylvaniaJ. PA Acad. Sci., 64
H. Salwasser (1991)
Challenges in the Conservation of Biological Resources: A Practioner's Guide
J. L. Plafkin, M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross, R. M. Hughes (1989)
Rapid bioassessmet protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish
W. Mitsch (1994)
Global wetlands: old world and new
C. Robbins, D. Dawson, B. Dowell (1989)
Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle Atlantic states, 103
R. P. Brooks, M. J. Croonquist, E. T. D'Silva, J. E. Gallagher, D. E. Arnold (1991)
Biological Criteria: Research and Regulation
J. N. Miller, R. P. Brooks, M. J. Croonquist (1997)
Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communitiesLandsc. Ecol., 12
R. Magnien, D. Boward, S. Bieber (1995)
The state of the Chesapeake Bay 1995
Luna Leopold (1968)
Water; a primer
J. Messer (1992)
Indicators in Regional Ecological Monitoring and Risk Assessment
Mary Kentula (1992)
An Approach to Improving Decision-Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation
P. L. Angermeier, J. R. Karr (1994)
Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directivesBioscience, 44
R. Hughes, D. Larsen, J. Omernik (1986)
Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentialsEnvironmental Management, 10
Our premise is that measures of ecological indicators and habitat conditions will vary between reference standard sites and reference sites that are impacted, and that these measures can be applied consistently across a regional gradient in the form of a Regional Index of Biological Integrity (RIBI). Six principles are proposed to guide development of any RIBI: 1) biological communities with high integrity are the desired endpoints; 2) indicators can have a biological, physical, or chemical basis; 3) indicators should be tied to specific stressors that can be realistically managed; 4) linkages across geographic scales and ecosystems should be provided; 5) reference standards should be used to define target conditions; and 6) assessment protocols should be efficiently and rapidly applied. To illustrate how a RIBI might be developed, we show how four integrative bioindicators can be combined to develop a RIBI for forest riparian ecosystems in the Mid-Atlantic states: 1) macroinvertebrate communities, 2) amphibian communities, 3) avian communities, and 4) avain productivity, primarily for the Louisiana waterthrush (Seirius motacilla). By providing a reliable expression of environmental stress or change, a RIBI can help managers reach scientifically defensible decisions.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 15, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.