Think tank reveals plan to manage tropical forests

Think tank reveals plan to manage tropical forests A high-profile group of thinkers has come up with a straightforward way to integrate long-term forest management into an international agreement on halting deforestation. It is not clear whether the proposal — released on 18 July by the Terrestrial Carbon Group of international scientists, economists and land-policy experts — has political legs. The idea is to 'lump together' all of the carbon locked up in tropical forests and then allow all countries to cash in on forest protection by trading carbon credits, regardless of whether logging is currently a problem within their borders. The proposal differs from the leading framework under the current United Nations (UN) proposal, which would establish baseline deforestation rates for each country and then allow them to sell carbon credits into an international market if they can reduce the rate of deforestation. Countries that do not currently have problems with deforestation stand to gain nothing under the UN system, which would mainly benefit countries such as Brazil and Indonesia. Many fear that it could leave the rest of the tropics exposed to logging pressure in the future. Dan Nepstad, a deforestation expert who is a member of the Terrestrial Carbon Group, says that the group's proposal emphasizes the need for a comprehensive solution for dealing with all tropical forests. “My hope is that it sends a signal to India, Costa Rica, China and other places that there will ultimately be a more robust mechanism that will bring rewards to them,” says Nepstad, formerly a scientist at the Woods Hole Research Center in Massachusetts who recently joined the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation in San Francisco, California, to head its environmental conservation programmes. He is among more than a dozen scientists and economists, including Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University, New York, who worked on the proposal, which was organized by the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists in Australia. &newsad; The number of credits that can be sold would be limited each year, guaranteeing a stable, long-term market. And it requires countries to maintain protected areas, including those for which carbon credits have been sold. Doug Boucher, a deforestation expert with the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington, calls the approach “novel” but says it introduces a new set of problems, notably that credits could be sold now when the threat of deforestation is decades down the road. He also questions whether negotiators are open to a radical shift in direction at this point. “There's really some strong momentum now,” Boucher says. “That's good, but it does tend to limit the possible options.” http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nature Springer Journals

Think tank reveals plan to manage tropical forests

Nature, Volume 454 (7203) – Jul 23, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/think-tank-reveals-plan-to-manage-tropical-forests-9E4mlpKh0t
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Nature Publishing Group
ISSN
0028-0836
eISSN
1476-4687
D.O.I.
10.1038/454373b
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A high-profile group of thinkers has come up with a straightforward way to integrate long-term forest management into an international agreement on halting deforestation. It is not clear whether the proposal — released on 18 July by the Terrestrial Carbon Group of international scientists, economists and land-policy experts — has political legs. The idea is to 'lump together' all of the carbon locked up in tropical forests and then allow all countries to cash in on forest protection by trading carbon credits, regardless of whether logging is currently a problem within their borders. The proposal differs from the leading framework under the current United Nations (UN) proposal, which would establish baseline deforestation rates for each country and then allow them to sell carbon credits into an international market if they can reduce the rate of deforestation. Countries that do not currently have problems with deforestation stand to gain nothing under the UN system, which would mainly benefit countries such as Brazil and Indonesia. Many fear that it could leave the rest of the tropics exposed to logging pressure in the future. Dan Nepstad, a deforestation expert who is a member of the Terrestrial Carbon Group, says that the group's proposal emphasizes the need for a comprehensive solution for dealing with all tropical forests. “My hope is that it sends a signal to India, Costa Rica, China and other places that there will ultimately be a more robust mechanism that will bring rewards to them,” says Nepstad, formerly a scientist at the Woods Hole Research Center in Massachusetts who recently joined the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation in San Francisco, California, to head its environmental conservation programmes. He is among more than a dozen scientists and economists, including Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University, New York, who worked on the proposal, which was organized by the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists in Australia. &newsad; The number of credits that can be sold would be limited each year, guaranteeing a stable, long-term market. And it requires countries to maintain protected areas, including those for which carbon credits have been sold. Doug Boucher, a deforestation expert with the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington, calls the approach “novel” but says it introduces a new set of problems, notably that credits could be sold now when the threat of deforestation is decades down the road. He also questions whether negotiators are open to a radical shift in direction at this point. “There's really some strong momentum now,” Boucher says. “That's good, but it does tend to limit the possible options.”

Journal

NatureSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 23, 2008

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off