Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Dewey (1899)
Democracy and Education
S. Shoemaker, S. Blackburn (1987)
Spreading the Word.Noûs, 21
(1991)
On Truth
J. Dewey (1943)
Twentieth Century Philosophy
E. Mach, T. Mccormack
Popular scientific lectures
P. Teller (2001)
Whither Constructive Empiricism?Philosophical Studies, 106
M. Morgan, Margaret Morrison (1999)
Models as Mediators
P. Teller, B. Fraassen (1991)
Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View
J. Dewey (1899)
Reconstruction in Philosophy
P. Horwich (1991)
The Nature and Norms of Theoretical CommitmentPhilosophy of Science, 58
M. Marion (1998)
Wittgenstein, finitism, and the foundations of mathematics
William Demopoulos, B. Fraassen (1980)
The Scientific Image
W. James (1975)
Pragmatism
K. Popper (1972)
Conjectures and Refutations
A. Fine (1986)
Unnatural Attitudes: Realist and Instrumentalist Attachments to ScienceMind
P. Horwich (1991)
On the Nature and Norms of Theoretical CommitmentPhilosophy of Science, 58
N. Cartwright (1999)
The dappled world : a study of the boundaries of science
B. Fraassen (1991)
Quantum mechanics
N.R. Campbell (1920)
Physics; the Elements
ARTHUR FINE What we represent to ourselves behind the appear- ances exists only in our understanding ... [having] only the value of memoria technica or formula whose form, because it is arbitrary and irrelevant, varies ... with the standpoint of our culture. I. INTRODUCTION The Scientific Image arrived in 1980 like a breath of fresh air. Although in the introduction van Fraassen counts me among the realist foot soldiers, at just that time Micky Forbes and I were engaged in rethinking the whole realism/antirealism issue. The result was NOA. Van Fraassen’s powerful and enlightening mono- graph encouraged us in that project. If Mickey and I are parents of NOA, then Bas is perhaps a godfather. Paul Teller too, since he was among the people then who helped us refine our ideas as they developed. So, today’s symposium feels rather like a family reunion. Of course, notoriously, such family events can be quarrelsome. But, despite some criticism to come, I do not expect today’s event to have that character. Anyway, there is already plenty of criticism of constructive empiricism, much of it directed at certain features that are high- lighted in The Scientific Image. I have in mind, in particular,
Philosophical Studies – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 4, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.