Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sidney Ingerman, M. Piore, C. Sabel (1984)
The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for ProsperityLabour/Le Travail, 20
J. Schumpeter (1943)
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
N. Ireland, M. Aoki (1984)
The co-operative game theory of the firm
A. Karnani (1984)
Generic Competitive Strategies – An Analytical ApproachStrategic Management Journal, 5
(1994)
‘Estimación de un modelo de ecuaciones simult·neas con VDL: Una aplicación con datos de la Industria Española’
R. Levin, Wesley Cohen, D. Mowery (1985)
R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian HypothesesThe American Economic Review, 75
A. Kleinknecht (1989)
Firm size and innovationSmall Business Economics, 1
W. Scheirer (1991)
Firm size and innovation: A commentSmall Business Economics, 3
T. Greenfield, S. Anderson, A. Auquier, W. Hauck, D. Oakes, W. Vandaele, H. Weisberg (1980)
Statistical Methods for Comparative StudiesThe Statistician, 30
B. Wernerfelt (1984)
A Resource-Based View of the FirmSouthern Medical Journal, 5
S. G. Winter (1986)
The Dynamics of Market Economies
W. Abernathy, K. Clark (1993)
Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆Research Policy, 22
Aneel Karnani (1983)
Minimum Market ShareMarketing Science, 2
M. Casson (1995)
The organization of international business
Z. Acs, D. Audretsch (1988)
Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical AnalysisThe American Economic Review, 78
Aneel Karnani (1984)
Generic competitive strategies—An analytical approachSouthern Medical Journal, 5
B. Johns, W. Hogan (1961)
A THEORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE FIRMEconomic Record, 37
M. Arellano, O. Bover (1995)
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components modelsJournal of Econometrics, 68
S. Nickell, S. Wadhwani (1990)
Insider Forces And Wage DeterminationThe Economic Journal, 100
W. Diebold, M. Piore, C. Sabel (1985)
The Second Industrial DivideForeign Affairs, 63
A. Kleinknecht (1989)
Firm Size and Innovation – Observation in Dutch Manufacturing IndustriesSmall Business Economics, 1
R. Cyert, Praveen Kumar (1996)
Economizing by firms through learning and adaptationJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 29
Marcel Lever, Jolanda Werkhooven (1996)
Insider power, market power, firm size and wages: Evidence from Dutch manufacturing industriesLabour Economics, 3
B. Holmlund, Johnny Zetterberg (1991)
Insider effects in wage determination: Evidence from five countriesEuropean Economic Review, 35
Peter Doeringer, M. Piore (2020)
Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis
D. Teece (1993)
Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policyResearch Policy, 15
J. Barney (1991)
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive AdvantageJournal of Management, 17
B. Wernerfelt (1984)
A Resource-Based View of the FirmStrategic Management Journal, 5
S. Nickell, J. Vainiomäki, S. Wadhwani (1994)
Wages and Product Market PowerEconomica, 61
Ingemar Dierickx, Karel Cool (1989)
Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantageManagement Science, 35
S. Winter (1983)
Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological RegimesJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5
R. Blundell, Stephen Bond (1998)
Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models
(1995)
On the Use of Initial Conditions in Dynamic Panel Data Models’, mimeograph
R. Henderson, W. Mitchell (1997)
The Interactions of Organizational and Competitive Influences on Strategy and PerformanceStrategic Management Journal, 18
R. M. Cyert, P. Kumar (1996)
Strategies for Technological Innovation with Learning and Adaptation CostsJournal of Economics & Managerial Strategy, 5
Our aim was to analyze the effects of firms' innovative behavior on their employees' salaries in the Spanish manufacturing industry. We found a premium in the wage paid by innovative firms, regardless of size. However, when taking company size into account, we found that the effect of innovations was greater in small-medium enterprises (SME), contrary to what was expected. The inferences of the models estimated suggest that the higher the market concentration the weaker the appropriability regime, especially for SMEs. However, at the same time, a firm's innovations reduce the impact of market concentration on wages, making innovating firms more autonomous than non-innovating ones. Even more, to be able to innovate, firms have to isolate their employees' salaries from the product market. These results hold regardless of firm's size, but have a greater impact on the small-medium group of firms. Finally, our analysis backs the assumption that salaries in both large and small-medium firms are generated by two distinct economic regimes, supporting the proposition that an SME is not simply a scaled-down large firm.
Small Business Economics – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 30, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.