Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Naccache, S. Dehaene (2001)
Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuliCognition, 80
S. Monsell, J. Driver (2000)
Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII
G. Dreisbach, H. Haider (2008)
That’s what task sets are for: shielding against irrelevant informationPsychological Research, 72
A. Kiesel, Mike Wendt, A. Peters (2007)
Task switching: on the origin of response congruency effectsPsychological Research, 71
B. Hommel (1998)
Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response EpisodesVisual Cognition, 5
C. Frings, Birte Moeller, K. Rothermund (2013)
Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediatedAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75
G. Dreisbach, H. Haider (2009)
How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 35 2
Yoav Kessler, N. Meiran (2010)
The reaction-time task-rule congruency effect is not affected by working memory load: further support for the activated long-term memory hypothesisPsychological Research PRPF, 74
G. Dreisbach, D. Wenke (2011)
The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 37 6
R. Remington, C. Folk, John Mclean (2001)
Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?Perception & Psychophysics, 63
E. Bussche, Karolien Notebaert, B. Reynvoet (2009)
Masked primes can be genuinely semantically processed: a picture prime study.Experimental psychology, 56 5
B. Reynvoet, W. Gevers, Bernie Caessens (2005)
Unconscious primes activate motor codes through semantics.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 31 5
K. Klauer, Andreas Eder, A. Greenwald, Richard Abrams (2007)
Priming of semantic classifications by novel subliminal prime wordsConsciousness and Cognition, 16
W. Glaser, M. Glaser (1989)
Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 118 1
I Jentzsch, C Dudschig (2009)
Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of posterror slowingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62
Oshrit Cohen-Kdoshay, N. Meiran (2006)
The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigmQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60
G. Logan (1988)
Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review, 95
J. Pratt, J. Mcauliffe (2002)
Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusivePerception & Psychophysics, 64
I. Jentzsch, Carolin Dudschig (2009)
Short Article: Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of posterror slowingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62
Mike Wendt, A. Kiesel (2008)
The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasksPsychological Research, 72
Wilfried Kunde, A. Kiesel, J. Hoffmann (2003)
Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognitionCognition, 88
P. Sudevan, D. Taylor (1987)
The cuing and priming of cognitive operations.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 13 1
F. Opstal, F. Lange, S. Dehaene (2011)
Rapid parallel semantic processing of numbers without awarenessCognition, 120
B. Hommel (2000)
The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation
Oshrit Cohen-Kdoshay, N. Meiran (2009)
The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions.Experimental psychology, 56 2
F. Opstal, W. Gevers, M. Osman, T. Verguts (2010)
Unconscious task applicationConsciousness and Cognition, 19
W. Tryon (2001)
Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.Psychological methods, 6 4
M. Smith, L. Magee (1980)
Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 109 4
T. Egner, J. Hirsch (2005)
Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant informationNature Neuroscience, 8
D. Wenke, R. Gaschler, D. Nattkemper (2007)
Instruction-induced feature bindingPsychological Research, 71
RS Woodworth (1938)
Experimental psychology
J. Snodgrass, M. Vanderwart (1980)
A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory, 6 2
N. Meiran, Yoav Kessler, Esther Adi-Japha (2008)
Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switchingPsychological Research, 72
Einat Yehene, N. Meiran, N. Soroker (2005)
Task alternation cost without task alternation: Measuring intentionalityNeuropsychologia, 43
N. Meiran, Yoav Kessler (2008)
The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 34 1
W. Notebaert, Femke Houtman, F. Opstal, W. Gevers, W. Fias, T. Verguts (2009)
Post-error slowing: An orienting accountCognition, 111
The goal of the study was to investigate whether task rules are automatically applied to irrelevant distracters. In three experiments, subjects categorized target words which were superimposed on distracter pictures. The categorization rule was arbitrary and the distracters were not relevant at any point during the experiment. We found congruency effects for distracters that belonged to the task-relevant categories, but were never presented as target words. Responses were faster when target and distracter belonged to the same category, i.e., were mapped to the same response, than when they were mapped to different responses. Since the distracters were never responded to in the course of the experiment, interference caused by retrieval of S-R episodes cannot explain the results. Instead, we propose that even arbitrary categorization rules are applied to all suitable stimuli, including distracters. Results are taken as evidence that a currently relevant task rule enhances processing of target-related information thereby increasing interference by task related, but currently irrelevant information.
Psychological Research – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 18, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.