Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
U. Wolfensteller, Hannes Ruge (2011)
On the timescale of stimulus-based action–effect learningQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64
R. Pfister, A. Kiesel, J. Hoffmann (2011)
Learning at any rate: action–effect learning for stimulus-based actionsPsychological Research, 75
P. Fitts, Charles Seeger (1953)
S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.Journal of experimental psychology, 46 3
S. Blakemore, D. Wolpert, C. Frith (1998)
Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensationNature Neuroscience, 1
W. Prinz (1997)
Perception and Action PlanningEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9
Arvid Herwig, W. Prinz, Florian Waszak (2007)
Two Modes of Sensorimotor Integration in Intention-Based and Stimulus-Based ActionsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60
D. Pelli (1997)
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.Spatial vision, 10 4
F. Restle (1970)
Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83
B. Hommel, R. Proctor, K. Vu (2004)
A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon taskPsychological Research, 68
R. Jong, Chia-Chin Liang, E. Lauber (1994)
Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 20 4
SC Goodhew, J Pratt, PE Dux, S Ferber (2013)
Substituting objects from consciousness: a review of object substitution maskingPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20
R. Proctor, James Miles, Giulia Baroni (2011)
Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effectsPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18
Pedro Cardoso-Leite, P. Mamassian, S. Schütz-Bosbach, Florian Waszak (2010)
A New Look at Sensory Attenuation: Action-Effect Anticipation Affects Sensitivity, Not Response Bias
(2013)
SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial-numerical associations.
Stephanie Goodhew, J. Pratt, P. Dux, S. Ferber (2013)
Substituting objects from consciousness: A review of object substitution maskingPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20
Guilherme Wood, K. Willmes, H. Nuerk, M. Fischer (2008)
On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC EffectPsychology Science, 50
V. Lollo, J. Enns, Ronald Rensink (2000)
Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 129 4
W. Gevers, T. Verguts, B. Reynvoet, Bernie Caessens, W. Fias (2006)
Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 32 1
W. Schwarz, I. Keus (2004)
Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responsesPerception & Psychophysics, 66
J. Müsseler, B. Hommel (1997)
Blindness to response-compatible stimuli.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 23 3
B. Stürmer, H. Leuthold, E. Soetens, Hannes Schröter, W. Sommer (2002)
Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 28 6
W. Gevers, Elie Ratinckx, Wouter Baene, W. Fias (2006)
Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.Experimental psychology, 53 1
B. Hommel (1998)
Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response EpisodesVisual Cognition, 5
B. Elsner, B. Hommel (2001)
Effect anticipation and action control.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 27 1
Peter Wühr (2005)
Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task.Psychonomic bulletin & review, 12 2
B. Elsner, B. Hommel (2004)
Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learningPsychological Research, 68
G. Moretto, G. Pellegrino (2008)
Grasping numbersExperimental Brain Research, 188
S. Dehaene, Serge Bossini, P. Giraux (1993)
The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122
J. Dijck, W. Fias (2011)
A working memory account for spatial–numerical associationsCognition, 119
D. Gozli, Stephanie Goodhew, J. Moskowitz, J. Pratt (2013)
Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueingPsychological Research, 77
J. Simon, Richard Simon (1969)
Reactions toward the source of stimulation.Journal of experimental psychology, 81 1
Cédric Roussel, Gethin Hughes, Florian Waszak (2014)
Action prediction modulates both neurophysiological and psychophysical indices of sensory attenuationFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8
W. Gevers, Bernie Caessens, W. Fias (2005)
Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effectsEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17
V Lollo, JT Enns, RA Rensink (2000)
Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processesJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129
W. Notebaert, W. Gevers, T. Verguts, W. Fias (2006)
Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: the reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 32 5
Gi-Yeul Bae, J. Choi, Yang Cho, R. Proctor (2009)
Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 35 6
S. Shaki, M. Fischer, W. Petrusic (2009)
Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effectPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16
Wilfried Kunde (2004)
Response priming by supraliminal and subliminal action effectsPsychological Research, 68
Arvid Herwig, Florian Waszak (2012)
Action-Effect Bindings and Ideomotor Learning in Intention- and Stimulus-Based ActionsFrontiers in Psychology, 3
Peter Wühr, Jochen Müsseler (2001)
Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 27 5
Marwan Daar, J. Pratt (2008)
Digits affect actions: The SNARC effect and response selectionCortex, 44
J. Enns, V. Lollo (1997)
Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual LocationsPsychological Science, 8
S. Shaki, M. Fischer (2013)
Random walks on the mental number lineExperimental Brain Research, 232
A. Treisman, G. Gelade (1980)
A feature-integration theory of attentionCognitive Psychology, 12
D. Brainard (1997)
The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial vision, 10 4
B. Hommel, J. Müsseler, G. Aschersleben, W. Prinz (2001)
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.The Behavioral and brain sciences, 24 5
(1998)
Semantic priming
M. Fischer, A. Castel, Michael Dodd, J. Pratt (2003)
Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attentionNature Neuroscience, 6
S. Shaki, M. Fischer (2008)
Reading space into numbers – a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effectCognition, 108
R. Proctor, Yang Cho (2006)
Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks.Psychological bulletin, 132 3
If given a relatively small number and asked to make a speeded parity judgment using the left and right responses, people typically respond faster with their left response. Conversely, if given a relatively large number, people usually respond faster with their right response. This finding, however, has primarily been shown using speeded tasks with response time as the primary measure. Here, we report an experiment testing if this remains to be the case in a non-speeded target identification. Using an object-substitution masking paradigm with no emphasis on response speed, number magnitude compatibility with the response hand influenced the accuracy of parity judgments. Given the non-speeded nature of the task, accuracy changes indicate that compatibility affects perception, rather than just response selection. This is explained using a common coding, feature integration approach in which stimuli and responses are represented in a common code and bidirectionally influence each other.
Psychological Research – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 12, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.