Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[In the conclusion, the authors argue that public participation should not be seen as a “one fits all” solution to a “crisis of trust” in emerging biotechnologies, but rather as a tool to work on collective visions for the future. To promote a productive approach in designing participatory strategies and formats, we need to consider the structural prerequisites, the value systems, and the communicative channels that enable participation in synthetic biology. The authors offer ten recommendations to foster a dialogue on how participation as an effective tool of governance can be pursued.]
Published: Mar 16, 2023
Keywords: Recommendations Governance Synthetic Biology; Participation; Responsibility; Trust; Institutional Arrangements
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.