Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Jarschel, Simon Oechsner, D. Schlosser, R. Pries, Sebastian Goll, P. Tran-Gia (2011)
Modeling and performance evaluation of an OpenFlow architecture2011 23rd International Teletraffic Congress (ITC)
Y. Ganjali, Amin Tootoonchian (2010)
HyperFlow: A Distributed Control Plane for OpenFlow
Long Yao, P. Hong, Wei Zhou (2014)
Evaluating the controller capacity in software defined networking2014 23rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)
S. Yeganeh, Y. Ganjali (2012)
Kandoo: a framework for efficient and scalable offloading of control applications
N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, J. Turner (2008)
OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networksComput. Commun. Rev., 38
Amin Tootoonchian, S. Gorbunov, Y. Ganjali, M. Casado, Rob Sherwood (2012)
On Controller Performance in Software-Defined Networks
K. Nguyen, Q. Minh, S. Yamada (2013)
A Software-Defined Networking Approach for Disaster-Resilient WANs2013 22nd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)
Brent Stephens, A. Cox, Wes Felter, C. Dixon, J. Carter (2012)
PAST: scalable ethernet for data centers
G. Como, K. Savla, Daron Acemoglu, M. Dahleh, Emilio Frazzoli (2011)
Robust distributed routing in dynamical flow networksIEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference
F. Giroire, J. Moulierac, T. Phan (2014)
Optimizing rule placement in software-defined networks for energy-aware routing2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference
S. Schmid, J. Suomela (2013)
Exploiting locality in distributed SDN control
F. Németh, Balázs Sonkoly, Levente Csikor, A. Gulyás (2013)
A large-scale multipath playground for experimenters and early adoptersProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM
A. Ford, C. Raiciu, M. Handley, S. Barré, J. Iyengar (2011)
Architectural Guidelines for Multipath TCP DevelopmentRFC, 6182
Yury Jimenez, C. Cervelló-Pastor, Aurelio Garcia (2014)
On the controller placement for designing a distributed SDN control layer2014 IFIP Networking Conference
Yannan Hu, Wendong Wang, Xiangyang Gong, Xirong Que, Shiduan Cheng (2013)
Reliability-aware controller placement for Software-Defined Networks2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2013)
Brandon Heller, Rob Sherwood, N. McKeown (2012)
The controller placement problem, 42
[Software defined network (SDN) is a newly emerging network architecture with the core concept of separating the control plane and data plane. Centralized controller is introduced to manage and configure network equipments to realize flexible control of network traffic and provide a good platform for application-oriented network innovation. It thus be able to improve network resource utilization, simplify network management, reduce operating cost, and promote innovation and evolution. Routing is always a major concern in network management. When SDN devices (e.g., OpenFlow switches) are introduced, routing becomes different. The flow table is usually implemented in expensive and power-hungry Ternary Content Addressable Memory (TCAM), which is thus capacity-limited. How to optimize the network performance in the consideration of limited TCAM capacity is therefore significant. For example, multi-path routing (MPR) has been widely regarded as a promising method to promote the network performance. But MPR is at the expense of additional forwarding rule, imposing burden on the limited flow table. On the other hand, a logical centralized programmable controller manages the whole SDN by installing rules onto switches. It is widely regarded that one controller is restricted on both performance and scalability. To address these limitations, pioneering researchers advocate deploying multiple controllers in SDNs where each controller is in charge of a set of switches. This raises the switch-controller association problem on a switch shall be managed by which controller. In this chapter, we first investigate how to schedule MPR with joint consideration of forwarding rule placement. Then, we study a minimum cost switch-controller association (MC-SCA) problem on how to minimize the number of controllers needed in an SDN while guaranteeing the flow setup time.]
Published: Nov 26, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.