Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Social isolation and gender

Social isolation and gender This study investigated the relationship between gender and social support. It was found that men were more isolated than women although there were no gender differences in perceived adequacy (i.e., satisfaction with one's social support network) or network size. Given that both the adequacy and network size variables were associated with socially desirable responding but the isolation variable was not, the results suggest that the behaviorally oriented indicator of isolation was a better measure of the degree of social isolation than traditional subjective scales currently used by many researchers. This suggests that traditional measures of social support that incorporate the dimensions of network size and perceived adequacy of one's social support system need to control for socially desirable responding and that measures can and need to be developed that are not significantly influenced by this response set bias. Hence, the assessment of social support may need to be more multifaceted than is currently undertaken in many studies. Our finding that men reported being more isolated than women may be a function, in part, of the fact that the majority of the sample (76.7%) was single/did not live with a partner. Previous research has found that men generally get their emotional needs met by their spouses/partners while women often get their emotional needs met by their female friends. Consistent with the literature, and given that most of our respondents were single, this study supports the contention that men are generally more socially isolated than women because they do not create adequate emotional intimacy when they are not in partnership with a significant other. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Current Psychology Springer Journals

Social isolation and gender

Vandervoort, Debra
Current Psychology , Volume 19 (3) – Jul 30, 2000
Download PDF
8 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/social-isolation-and-gender-uP07x7O0Vg
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Springer
Subject
Psychology; Psychology, general; Social Sciences, general; Interdisciplinary Studies
ISSN
1046-1310
eISSN
1936-4733
DOI
10.1007/s12144-000-1017-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between gender and social support. It was found that men were more isolated than women although there were no gender differences in perceived adequacy (i.e., satisfaction with one's social support network) or network size. Given that both the adequacy and network size variables were associated with socially desirable responding but the isolation variable was not, the results suggest that the behaviorally oriented indicator of isolation was a better measure of the degree of social isolation than traditional subjective scales currently used by many researchers. This suggests that traditional measures of social support that incorporate the dimensions of network size and perceived adequacy of one's social support system need to control for socially desirable responding and that measures can and need to be developed that are not significantly influenced by this response set bias. Hence, the assessment of social support may need to be more multifaceted than is currently undertaken in many studies. Our finding that men reported being more isolated than women may be a function, in part, of the fact that the majority of the sample (76.7%) was single/did not live with a partner. Previous research has found that men generally get their emotional needs met by their spouses/partners while women often get their emotional needs met by their female friends. Consistent with the literature, and given that most of our respondents were single, this study supports the contention that men are generally more socially isolated than women because they do not create adequate emotional intimacy when they are not in partnership with a significant other.

Journal

Current Psychology – Springer Journals

Published: Jul 30, 2000

References

  • Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness
    Anderson, S. M.; Bern, S. L.
  • An examination of sex differences in social support in mid and late life
    Antonucci, T. C. }; Akiyama, H.
  • Support seeking in personal relationships. Special Issue: Predicting, activating and facilitating social support
    Barbee, A. P.; Gulley, M. R. }; Cunningham, M. R.
  • Gender and stress
    Belle, D.
  • Social support and health.
    Berkman, L. F.
  • Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine year followup study of the Alameda County residents
    Berkman, L. F.; Syme, S. L.
  • Gender differences in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: The contributions of social networks and support
    Berkman, L. F.; Vaccarino, V.; Seeman, T.
  • Social support and mortality in an elderly community population
    Blazer, D.
  • Sex differences in sameand cross-sex supportive relationships
    Buhrke, R. A.; Fuqua, D. R.
  • The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence.
    Crowne, D. P.; Marlowe, D.
  • The behavior of women and men.
    Deaux, K.
  • Gender differences in the perception and utilization of social support: Theoretical perspectives and an empirical test
    Flaherty, J.; Richman, J.
  • The contribution of marriage to the psychological well-being of males and females
    Glenn, N.
  • Mortality after bereavement
    Helsing, K. J.; Szklo, M.
  • The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: Prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study
    House, J. S.; Robbins, C.; Metzner, H. L.
  • Social support: Theory, research and applications
    Kessler, R. C; McLeod, J. D.; Wethington, E.
  • Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable
    Lowenthal, M. F.; Haven, C.
  • The psychology of sex differences
    Maccoby, E. E.; Jacklin, C. N.
  • Motivation and personality
    Maslow, A.
  • Gender, life strain, and depression
    Newman, J. P.
  • Social network interaction and mortality: A six year followup study of a random sample of the Swedish population
    Orth-Gomer, K.; Johnson, J. V.
  • Marital status, life strains, and depression
    Pearlin, L. I.; Johnson, J. S.
  • Sex differences in intimate friendships in old age
    Powers, E.; Bultena, G.
  • The significance of best-friend relationships in adolescence
    Richey, M. H.; Richey, H. W.
  • A way of being.
    Rogers, C. R.
  • On becoming a person.
    Rogers, C. R.
  • Concomitants of social support: Social skills, physical attractiveness, and gender
    Sarason, B. R.; Sarason, I. G.; Hacker, T. A.; Basham, R. B.
  • Social ties and mortality in Evans County, Georgia
    Schoenbach, V.; Kaplan, B.H.; Fredman, L.; Kleinbaum, D.
  • Gender differences in social support and physical health
    Shumaker, S. A.; Hill, D. R.
  • Stress, coping, and social support in women
    Solomon, L. J.; Rothblum, E. D.
  • Single life: Unmarried adults in social contexts.
    Somers, A. R.
  • Gender differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics
    Stokes, J.; Levin, I.
  • Health psychology.
    Taylor, S. E.
  • Gender and social support: Taking the bad with the good?
    Turner, H. A.
  • Social support: Theory, research, and intervention.
    Vaux, A.
  • Variations in social support associated with gender, ethnicity, & age
    Vaux, A.
  • Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles
    Wheeler, L.; Reis, H.; Nzlek, J.
  • The sex differential in morality from all causes and ischemie heart disease
    Wingard, D. L.; Suarez, L.; Barrett-Conner, E.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial