Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
NA Palomares (2009)
Women are sort of more tentative than men, aren?t they? How men and women use tentative language differently, similarly, and counterstereotypically as a function of gender salienceCommunication Research, 36
J. Hyde, Sara Lind-Berg, Shelly Grabe, Jenni Petersen, Shibley Hyde (2005)
The Gender Similarities Hypothesis the Role of Meta-analysis in Assessing Psychological Gender Differences
(1991)
The Adult Spine
J. Hampton, G. Storms, Claire Simmons, Daniel Heussen (2009)
Feature integration in natural language conceptsMemory & Cognition, 37
Linda Carli, Chael Carmen, Jane Kravitz, J. Levy, M. Mackesy
Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Gender, Language, and Influence
O Spreen, E Strauss (1991)
A compendium of neuropsychological tests
K. Laws (1999)
Gender Affects Naming Latencies for Living and Nonliving Things: Implications for FamiliarityCortex, 35
D. Voyer, Susan Voyer, M. Bryden (1995)
Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.Psychological bulletin, 117 2
JS Hyde (2005)
The gender similarities hypothesisAmerican Psychologist, 60
M. Rhodes, S. Gelman (2009)
Five-year-olds’ beliefs about the discreteness of category boundaries for animals and artifactsPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16
M. Hines (2013)
Sex and Sex Differences
C. Bermeitinger, D. Wentura, C. Frings (2008)
Nature and facts about natural and artifactual categories: Sex differences in the semantic priming paradigmBrain and Language, 106
S. Golombok, J. Rust (1993)
The Pre-School Activities Inventory: A standardized assessment of gender role in children.Psychological Assessment, 5
D. Kimura (2002)
Sex hormones influence human cognitive pattern.Neuro endocrinology letters, 23 Suppl 4
G. Diesendruck, S. Gelman (1999)
Domain differences in absolute judgments of category membership: Evidence for an essentialist account of categorizationPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6
M. Hines (2009)
Gonadal Hormones and Sexual Differentiation of Human Brain and BehaviorHormones, brain and behavior, 5
D. Pfaff, A. Arnold, A. Etgen, S. Fahrbach, T. Robert (2009)
Hormones, brain, and behavior
Nicholas Palomares (2009)
Women Are Sort of More Tentative Than Men, Aren't They?Communication Research, 36
Zachary Estes (2003)
Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categoriesMemory & Cognition, 31
R. Barbarotto, M. Laiacona, Valeria Macchi, E. Capitani (2002)
Picture reality decision, semantic categories and gender A new set of pictures, with norms and an experimental studyNeuropsychologia, 40
M. Linn, A. Petersen (1985)
Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis.Child development, 56 6
B. Kolb, I. Whishaw (1995)
Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology
(2009)
Feature integration
J. Hampton (2007)
Typicality, Graded Membership, and VaguenessCognitive science, 31 3
J. Hampton (1998)
Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categoriesCognition, 65
Richard Brown (1986)
Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology (2nd Ed)Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 49
Jacob Cohen (1969)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral SciencesThe SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design
J. Hyde (2007)
New Directions in the Study of Gender Similarities and DifferencesCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 16
P. Lachenbruch (1989)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84
E. Strauss, O. Spreen (2009)
Comprar A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests - Administration, Norms, and Commentary | Esther Strauss | 9780195159578 | Oxford University Press
E. Capitani, M. Laiacona, R. Barbarotto (1999)
Gender Affects Word Retrieval of Certain Categories in Semantic Fluency TasksCortex, 35
B. Kolb, I. Whishaw (1990)
Fundamentals of human neuropsychology, 3rd ed.
Zachary Estes (2004)
Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: Definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely naturalPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11
L Carli (1990)
Gender, language, and influenceJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59
Sex differences in certain cognitive abilities, including aspects of semantic processing, are well established. However, there have been no reports investigating a sex difference in semantic categorization. A total of 55 men and 58 women each judged 25 exemplars of natural categories (e.g., fruits) and 25 of artifact categories (e.g., tools) as a nonmember, partial member, or full member of the given category. Participants also rated confidence for each judgment. Women provided a greater number of vague (partial member) judgments whereas men provided more inclusive (full member) judgments of artifacts but more exclusive (nonmember) judgments of natural categories. The sex difference in vagueness was observed across domains (Cohen’s d = .56). Confidence predicted categorization among both men and women, such that more confident participants exhibited fewer vague category judgments. However, men and women were equally confident in their category judgments, and confidence failed to explain the sex difference in categorization. Men and women appear to categorize the same common objects in systematically different ways.
Archives of Sexual Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 23, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.