Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Sex Differences in Semantic Categorization

Sex Differences in Semantic Categorization Sex differences in certain cognitive abilities, including aspects of semantic processing, are well established. However, there have been no reports investigating a sex difference in semantic categorization. A total of 55 men and 58 women each judged 25 exemplars of natural categories (e.g., fruits) and 25 of artifact categories (e.g., tools) as a nonmember, partial member, or full member of the given category. Participants also rated confidence for each judgment. Women provided a greater number of vague (partial member) judgments whereas men provided more inclusive (full member) judgments of artifacts but more exclusive (nonmember) judgments of natural categories. The sex difference in vagueness was observed across domains (Cohen’s d = .56). Confidence predicted categorization among both men and women, such that more confident participants exhibited fewer vague category judgments. However, men and women were equally confident in their category judgments, and confidence failed to explain the sex difference in categorization. Men and women appear to categorize the same common objects in systematically different ways. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Sexual Behavior Springer Journals

Sex Differences in Semantic Categorization

Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/sex-differences-in-semantic-categorization-yL0iniXJNW
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Psychology; Sexual Behavior; Public Health; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0004-0002
eISSN
1573-2800
DOI
10.1007/s10508-011-9764-y
pmid
21516365
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Sex differences in certain cognitive abilities, including aspects of semantic processing, are well established. However, there have been no reports investigating a sex difference in semantic categorization. A total of 55 men and 58 women each judged 25 exemplars of natural categories (e.g., fruits) and 25 of artifact categories (e.g., tools) as a nonmember, partial member, or full member of the given category. Participants also rated confidence for each judgment. Women provided a greater number of vague (partial member) judgments whereas men provided more inclusive (full member) judgments of artifacts but more exclusive (nonmember) judgments of natural categories. The sex difference in vagueness was observed across domains (Cohen’s d = .56). Confidence predicted categorization among both men and women, such that more confident participants exhibited fewer vague category judgments. However, men and women were equally confident in their category judgments, and confidence failed to explain the sex difference in categorization. Men and women appear to categorize the same common objects in systematically different ways.

Journal

Archives of Sexual Behavior – Springer Journals

Published: Apr 23, 2011

References

  • Picture reality decision, semantic categories and gender: A new set of pictures, with norms and an experimental study
    Barbarotto, R; Laiacona, M; Macchi, V; Capitani, E
  • Nature and facts about natural and artifactual categories: Sex differences in the semantic priming paradigm
    Bermeitinger, C; Wentura, D; Frings, C
  • Gender affects word retrieval of certain categories in semantic fluency tasks
    Capitani, E; Laiacona, M; Barbarotto, R
  • Gender, language, and influence
    Carli, L
  • Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
    Cohen, J
  • Domain differences in absolute judgments of category membership: Evidence for an essentialist account of categorization
    Diesendruck, G; Gelman, SA
  • Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories
    Estes, Z
  • Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: Definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural
    Estes, Z
  • The Pre-school Activities Inventory: A standardized assessment of gender role in children
    Golombok, S; Rust, J
  • Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories
    Hampton, JA
  • Typicality, graded membership, and vagueness
    Hampton, JA
  • Feature integration in natural language concepts
    Hampton, JA; Storms, G; Simmons, CL; Heussen, D
  • Hormones, brain and behavior
    Hines, M
  • The gender similarities hypothesis
    Hyde, JS
  • New directions in the study of gender similarities and differences
    Hyde, JS
  • Sex hormones influence human cognitive pattern
    Kimura, D
  • Fundamentals of human neuropsychology
    Kolb, B; Wishaw, IQ
  • Gender affects naming latencies for living and nonliving things: Implications for familiarity
    Laws, KR
  • Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis
    Linn, MC; Petersen, AC
  • Women are sort of more tentative than men, aren’t they? How men and women use tentative language differently, similarly, and counterstereotypically as a function of gender salience
    Palomares, NA
  • Five-year-olds’ beliefs about the discreteness of category boundaries for animals and artifacts
    Rhodes, M; Gelman, SA
  • A compendium of neuropsychological tests
    Spreen, O; Strauss, E
  • Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables
    Voyer, D; Voyer, S; Bryden, MP