Self-report oral health and disease experience among adults in China and NZ

Self-report oral health and disease experience among adults in China and NZ Objectives Differences in oral health perceptions complicate comparisons of self-reported oral health in countries with consid- erably different cultures, traditions, and dental care. We compared it in China and New Zealand (NZ), to determine whether adults in those countries differ in how self-report oral health item responses distinguish those with different clinical oral disease states. Materials and methods Analysis of representative data on dentate 35–44-year-olds and 65–74-year-olds from the 3rd National Oral Health Survey of China in 2005 (for Sichuan province) and the NZ Oral Health Survey in 2009. Self-rated oral health in the Chinese survey was assessed by asking “Overall, how would you rate your oral health?”(responses: “Very poor,”“Poor,”“Fair,” “Good,” and “Very good”).TheNZsurveyasked “How would you describe the health of your teeth or mouth?” (responses: “Excellent,”“Very good,”“Good,”“Fair,” or “Poor”). To enable comparability, these were combined to create a four-category ordinal measure of self-reported oral health. The slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII) determined the extent to which the four-category self-report item distinguished those with better or poorer oral status. Results A higher proportion of Chinese than NZ 35–44-year-olds rated their oral health as poor or fair, and the NZ proportion rating their http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Oral Investigations Springer Journals

Self-report oral health and disease experience among adults in China and NZ

Clinical Oral Investigations, Volume OnlineFirst – Sep 29, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/self-report-oral-health-and-disease-experience-among-adults-in-china-pDP0MhbZD7
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Dentistry; Dentistry
ISSN
1432-6981
eISSN
1436-3771
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00784-018-2652-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Objectives Differences in oral health perceptions complicate comparisons of self-reported oral health in countries with consid- erably different cultures, traditions, and dental care. We compared it in China and New Zealand (NZ), to determine whether adults in those countries differ in how self-report oral health item responses distinguish those with different clinical oral disease states. Materials and methods Analysis of representative data on dentate 35–44-year-olds and 65–74-year-olds from the 3rd National Oral Health Survey of China in 2005 (for Sichuan province) and the NZ Oral Health Survey in 2009. Self-rated oral health in the Chinese survey was assessed by asking “Overall, how would you rate your oral health?”(responses: “Very poor,”“Poor,”“Fair,” “Good,” and “Very good”).TheNZsurveyasked “How would you describe the health of your teeth or mouth?” (responses: “Excellent,”“Very good,”“Good,”“Fair,” or “Poor”). To enable comparability, these were combined to create a four-category ordinal measure of self-reported oral health. The slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII) determined the extent to which the four-category self-report item distinguished those with better or poorer oral status. Results A higher proportion of Chinese than NZ 35–44-year-olds rated their oral health as poor or fair, and the NZ proportion rating their

Journal

Clinical Oral InvestigationsSpringer Journals

Published: Sep 29, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off