Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Hutton (2004)
Anne Conway: Anne Finch, Viscountess Conway
Dmitri Levitin (2015)
Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700
R. Crocker (2003)
Henry More, 1614-1687
Michael Gill (2006)
The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics: SHAFTESBURY
J. Reid (2012)
The Metaphysics of Henry More
D. Hedley (2000)
Coleridge, Philosophy and Religion: Acknowledgements
L. Bergemann (2012)
Ralph Cudworth - System aus Transformation: Zur Naturphilosophie der Cambridge Platonists und ihrer Methode
C. Taliaferro (2005)
Evidence and faith
S. Hutton, R. Crocker (1989)
Henry More (1614-1687) tercentenary studies
D. Fouke (1997)
The Enthusiastical Concerns of Dr. Henry More: Religious Meaning and the Psychology of Delusion
Stephen Darwall (1995)
The British Moralists and the Internal 'Ought': 1640-1740
R. Pasnau (2011)
Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671
Frederick Beiser (1996)
The sovereignty of reason
[The Cambridge Platonists mark an important juncture in Western intellectual history. Benjamin Whichcote (1609–1683), Ralph Cudworth (1617–1688), Henry More (1614––1687) and John Smith (1618–1652) helped shape the modern idea of selfhood and the contemporary culture of autonomy, toleration, and rights. Not only do they represent one of the great phases of the Platonic tradition, but also this group of Cambridge thinkers arguably represent a ‘Copernican revolution’ in Western moral philosophy. Attention has also been drawn to their impact on women thinkers such as Anne Conway, Damaris Masham, Catharine Macaulay, and Mary Wollstonecraft. The key aesthetic notion of ‘disinterested pleasure’ can be traced back to Cambridge Platonist influence on Shaftesbury, and their concept of Plastic Nature shaped the modern concepts of artistic creativity and genius. There is, however, a striking neglect of Cambridge Platonism in contemporary research, and there is also disagreement about the application and even the legitimacy of the category ‘Cambridge Platonism’ itself. We maintain however that ‘Cambridge Platonism’ is nevertheless a helpful category for exploring the intellectual milieu or constellation of these thinkers. This is not to say that all of the figures included in this volume belong to a tightly defined group of ‘Platonists’, but a distinctive early modern transformation of Platonism is at work among these writers, and a better understanding of the networks, intellectual and personal, of these figures is the aim of the volume.]
Published: Jan 2, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.