Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Ziebart (2013)
Nicolaus Cusanus on Faith and the Intellect: A Case Study in 15th-Century Fides-Ratio Controversy
A. Long, J. Rist (1977)
Plotinus: The Road to Reality.The Philosophical Quarterly, 19
J. Levine (1992)
Philosophy, science, and religion in England 1640–1700: Latitudinarians, neoplatonists, and the ancient wisdom
Josefa, María, F. EnT.Hessy, Blanchard-Felds, W. Costello, Lesse Greeke (1958)
The Scholastic Curriculum at Early Seventeenth-Century Cambridge
N. Matar (1994)
Peter Sterry: Select Writings
S. Hutton (2001)
Ralph Cudworth, God, Mind and Nature, 180
Lewis Spitz, Barbara Tinsley (1993)
Johann Sturm on Education: The Reformation and Humanist Learning
Robert Greene (1991)
Whichcote, the Candle of the Lord, and SynderesisJournal of the History of Ideas, 52
D. Walker (1958)
Spiritual and Demonic Magic: From Ficino to Campanella
R. Crocker (1990)
Mysticism and Enthusiasm in Henry More
J. Roberts (1968)
From Puritanism to Platonism in Seventeenth Century England
Benjamin Merkle (2016)
Defending the Trinity in the Reformed Palatinate: The Elohistae
C. Burchill (1984)
Girolamo Zanchi: Portrait of a Reformed Theologian and His WorkThe Eighteenth Century, 15
C. Schmitt (1983)
Aristotle and the Renaissance
R. Chlup (2012)
Proclus: An Introduction
[Scholarly treatments of Peter Sterry and the Cambridge Platonists often view their reception of Platonism as radically different from their Puritan or Calvinist contemporaries. This essay focuses on three individuals, John Sherman, Girolamo Zanchi, and Peter Sterry, in order to clarify the variety of opinions regarding the value of Platonism for Christian theology among Protestant theologians in the Early Modern period. An example of this comes from John Sherman’s use of the Reformed scholastic, Girolamo Zanchi in a treatise that he delivered in the Trinity College chapel in 1641. In this treatise entitled A Greek in the Temple, Sherman argues for a pious reception of pagan wisdom based on the concept of perennial philosophy, ideas which led the early twentieth century historian J.B. Mullinger to conclude that Sherman was the original influence behind Cambridge Platonism. Yet, Sherman claims to receive many of these ideas from Zanchi, an Aristotelian who recommends Ficino and Steuco’s works in his writings and refers to Plotinus as “homo Christianus.” Peter Sterry was likely familiar with Zanchi, though Sterry takes greater liberty in the ideas that he borrows from the Platonists and he rejects the Aristotelian method in favor of the method of coincidence similar to that used by Nicholas Cusanus.]
Published: Jan 2, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.