Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Frank Steinicke (2016)
Being Really Virtual
D. Gentner, J. Nielsen (1996)
The Anti-Mac interfaceCommun. ACM, 39
J. Nielsen (1993)
Noncommand user interfacesCommun. ACM, 36
P. Denning, T. Lewis (2016)
Exponential laws of computing growthCommunications of the ACM, 60
G. Moore (1998)
Cramming More Components Onto Integrated CircuitsProceedings of the IEEE, 86
M. Schnabel (2004)
Architectural design in virtual environments: exploring cognition and communication in immersive virtualenvironments
J. Parsons, Y. Wand (1997)
Choosing classes in conceptual modelingCommun. ACM, 40
Frank Steinicke (2016)
Being Really Virtual: Immersive Natives and the Future of Virtual Reality
A. Dam (1997)
Post-WIMP user interfacesCommun. ACM, 40
I. Sutherland (1968)
A head-mounted three dimensional displayProceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I
[Advances in technology have brought faster processors, more memory, and faster communications. These have enabled users to operate with larger and more complex data sets such as those corresponding to Big Data. This has placed greater pressure on the traditional methods by which the user interacts with both 2D and 3D environments in the computer. In addition, increased power and functionality along with the reduction in physical size of many electronic components has increased the trend toward mobile working. This could involve “hot-desking” with a laptop, or using a fully mobile, handheld device such as a tablet or mobile phone. This again increases the importance of a good visual interface to the user as it has to cater for user interaction requests in a relatively small screen space on a small device compared to more traditional ways of working (e.g., using a PC or workstation with a large screen). These latter configurations are more appropriate for CAD where users need to see large amounts of detail at any one time such as that corresponding to the architectural plans for a building. Using virtual reality technology (e.g., a CAVE system) it is now possible to also offer the user a walk-in environment where they are able to see this kind of detail in a simulated 3D environment and do a walk-through to see how the designed environment actually appears to the designer when it is being used. This helps to identify areas which need to be changed because they are not having the effect in real world that the user intended in the initial design. This is a means of avoiding expensive mistakes in the design and planning of major 3D buildings and other similar environments, and ensuring that they are able to optimally fulfill their original purpose.]
Published: Jan 31, 2018
Keywords: Digital technologies; Moore’s law; Post-silicon technologies; Post-wimp interfaces; Virtual reality; Augmented reality; 2D and 3D environments; Simulated walk-throughs; Mobile interfaces; Big data
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.