Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[The current so-called global financial crisis has introduced new sociopolitical and socio-economic conditions due to its unprecedented intensity, depth, and duration. Since its genesis, various studies have attempted to determine the nature of the economic crisis as a phenomenon, especially its causes and its consequences. A significant number of analyses suggest that the outbreak and escalation of the crisis are the result of financial mismanagement by various economic actors both at international and regional levels (IMF, 2009a, b, c; Ivashina and Scharfstein, 2009; Pauly, 2005, pp. 181–85, 196–98; Popov and Ongena, 2011, p. 13). Others have argued that the crisis is artificial (e.g. Norberg, 2009; Roberts, 2011; Schranz and Eisenegger, 2011; Sinn, 2010) that is, a construction mainly created by non-state actors, such as rating agencies, in order to strike a balance in the global capital antagonisms.]
Published: Dec 3, 2015
Keywords: European Union; International Monetary Fund; Public Debt; Global Context; Private Ownership
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.