Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Heather Buttle, J. Raymond (2003)
High familiarity enhances visual change detection for face stimuliPerception & Psychophysics, 65
Matthew Finkbeiner, Romina Palermo (2009)
The Role of Spatial Attention in Nonconscious ProcessingPsychological Science, 20
Margaret Jackson, J. Raymond (2006)
The role of attention and familiarity in face identificationPerception & Psychophysics, 68
N. Cowan (2001)
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacityBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 24
Tiffany Ito, Erin Thompson, J. Cacioppo (2004)
Tracking the Timecourse of Social Perception: The Effects of Racial Cues on Event-Related Brain PotentialsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30
S. Dakin, I. Mareschal, P. Bex (2004)
Equivalent noise analysis of motion integrationJournal of Vision, 4
Romina Palermo, G. Rhodes (2007)
Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interactNeuropsychologia, 45
Chunhong He, Antao Chen (2010)
Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual loadPsychological Research PRPF, 74
Tiffany Ito, Geoffrey Urland (2005)
The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perceptionCognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5
Muriele Brand-D’abrescia, N. Lavie (2007)
Distractor effects during processing of words under loadPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14
Markus Neumann, S. Schweinberger (2008)
N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual loadBrain Research, 1239
J. Theeuwes, A. Kramer, A. Belopolsky (2004)
Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual searchPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11
F. Tong, Ken Nakayama (1999)
Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 25 4
Jillian Fecteau, A. Bell, D. Munoz (2004)
Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention.Journal of neurophysiology, 92 3
Adam Biggs, B. Gibson (2010)
Competition between color salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down setAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72
Jeff Miller (1987)
Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed lettersPerception & Psychophysics, 41
N. Lavie, T. Ro, C. Russell (2003)
The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor FacesPsychological Science, 14
P. Vuilleumier (2000)
Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinctionNeuropsychologia, 38
R. Jenkins, A. Burton, A. Ellis (2002)
Long-term effects of covert face recognitionCognition, 86
W Schneider, A Eschman, A Zuccolotto (2002)
E-Prime user’s guide
Christel Devue, C. Laloyaux, D. Feyers, J. Theeuwes, S. Brédart (2009)
Do Pictures of Faces, and Which Ones, Capture Attention in the Inattentional-Blindness Paradigm?Perception, 38
M. Bindemann, A. Burton, R. Jenkins (2005)
Capacity limits for face processingCognition, 98
Tiffany Ito, Geoffrey Urland (2003)
Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals.Journal of personality and social psychology, 85 4
R. Caldara, B. Rossion, P. Bovet, C. Hauert (2004)
Event-related potentials and time course of the ‘other-race’ face classification advantageNeuroReport, 15
T. Ro, Ashley Friggel, N. Lavie (2007)
Attentional biases for faces and body partsVisual Cognition, 15
L. Reddy, P. Wilken, C. Koch (2004)
Face-gender discrimination is possible in the near-absence of attention.Journal of vision, 4 2
N. Lavie (1995)
Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 21 3
Past research indicates that faces can be more difficult to ignore than other types of stimuli. Given the important social and biological relevance of race and gender, the present study examined whether the processing of these facial characteristics is mandatory. Both unfamiliar and famous faces were assessed. Participants made speeded judgments about either the race (Experiment 1) or gender (Experiments 2–4) of a target name under varying levels of perceptual load, while ignoring a flanking distractor face that was either congruent or incongruent with the race/gender of the target name. In general, distractor–target congruency effects emerged when the perceptual load of the relevant task was low but not when the load was high, regardless of whether the distractor face was unfamiliar or famous. These findings suggest that face processing is not necessarily mandatory, and some aspects of faces can be ignored.
Psychological Research – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 15, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.