Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1985)
Effectiveness of self-help smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women in public health maternity clinics: A randomized trial
(1979)
Pregnancy and infant health
R. Windsor, C. Orleans (1986)
Guidelines and Methodological Standards for Smoking Cessation Intervention Research among Pregnant Women: Improving the Science and ArtHealth Education & Behavior, 13
P. Lee (1987)
Lung cancer and passive smoking: Association an artefact due to misclassification of smoking habits?☆Toxicology Letters, 35
(1984)
Review of techniques for measurement of smoking
W. Simpson (1957)
A preliminary report on cigarette smoking and the incidence of prematurity.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 73 4
C. Metz (1978)
Basic principles of ROC analysis.Seminars in nuclear medicine, 8 4
EG Hasselmayer, MB Meyer, C Catz, LD Longo (1979)
Smoking and Health, A Report of the Surgeon General
G. Swan, K. Habina, B. Means, J. Jobe, J. Esposito (1993)
Saliva cotinine and recent smoking--evidence for a nonlinear relationship.Public health reports, 108 6
J. Langone, H. Gjika, H. Vunakis (1973)
Nicotine and its metabolites. Radioimmunoassays for nicotine and cotinine.Biochemistry, 12 24
RA Windsor, CT Orleans (1986)
Guidelines and methodological standards for smoking cessation intervention research among pregnant women: Improving the science and artHealth Educ Q, 13
J. Kendrick, S. Zahniser, N. Miller, N. Salas, J. Stine, P. Gargiullo, R. Floyd, F. Spierto, M. Sexton, R. Metzger (1995)
Integrating smoking cessation into routine public prenatal care: the Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy project.American journal of public health, 85 2
Helen Vunakis, D. Tashkin, Basil Rigas, Michael Simmons, H. Gjika, Virginia Clark (1989)
Relative sensitivity and specificity of salivary and serum cotinine in identifying tobacco-smoking status of self-reported nonsmokers and smokers of tobacco and/or marijuana.Archives of environmental health, 44 1
R. Windsor, N. Boyd, C. Orleans (1998)
A meta-evaluation of smoking cessation intervention research among pregnant women: improving the science and art.Health education research, 13 3
J. Pierce, T. Dwyer, E. Digiusto, T. Carpenter, C. Hannam, A. Amin, C. Yong, G. Sarfaty, J. Shaw, N. Burke (1987)
Cotinine validation of self-reported smoking in commercially run community surveys.Journal of chronic diseases, 40 7
A. Hjalmarson, L. Hahn, B. Svanberg (1991)
Stopping smoking in pregnancy: effect of a self‐help manual in controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 98
T Pechacek, B Fox, D Murray, R Luepker (1984)
Behavioral health: A handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention
D. Ershoff, P. Mullen, V. Quinn (1989)
A randomized trial of a serialized self-help smoking cessation program for pregnant women in an HMO.American journal of public health, 79 2
N. Butler, H. Goldstein, E. Ross (1972)
Cigarette Smoking in Pregnancy: Its Influence on Birth Weight and Perinatal MortalityBritish Medical Journal, 2
R. Etzel (1990)
A review of the use of saliva cotinine as a marker of tobacco smoke exposure.Preventive medicine, 19 2
David Abrams, M. Follick, L. Biener, Kate Carey, J. Hitti (1987)
Saliva cotinine as a measure of smoking status in field settings.American journal of public health, 77 7
(1993)
Behavioral impact and cost benefit of health education methods for pregnant smokers in public health maternity clinics: The Birmingham Trail II
N. Haley, C. Axelrad, K. Tilton (1983)
Validation of self-reported smoking behavior: biochemical analyses of cotinine and thiocyanate.American journal of public health, 73 10
C. Li, R. Windsor, L. Perkins, Robert Goldenberg, J. Lowe (1993)
The impact on infant birth weight and gestational age of cotinine-validated smoking reduction during pregnancy.JAMA, 269 12
L. Wagenknecht, G. Burke, L. Perkins, N. Haley, G. Friedman (1992)
Misclassification of smoking status in the CARDIA study: a comparison of self-report with serum cotinine levels.American journal of public health, 82 1
E. Pérez-Stable, Brenda Herrera, P. Jacob, N. Benowitz (1998)
Nicotine metabolism and intake in black and white smokers.JAMA, 280 2
J. Haddow, G. Knight, E. Kloza, G. Palomaki, N. Wald (1991)
Cotinine‐assisted intervention in pregnancy to reduce smoking and low birthweight deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 98
P English, B. Eskenazi, R Christianson (1994)
Black-white differences in serum cotinine levels among pregnant women and subsequent effects on infant birthweight.American journal of public health, 84 9
M. Jarvis, H. Tunstall-Pedoe, C. Feyerabend, C. Vesey, Y. Saloojee (1987)
Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers.American journal of public health, 77 11
B. Macmahon, M. Alpert, E. Salber (1965)
Infant weight and parental smoking habits.American journal of epidemiology, 82 3
Objective. The objectives of this paper were to determine the rate of misclassification of smoking and nonsmoking status by self-reports and saliva cotinine of pregnant women participating in a smoking cessation trial, determine the relationship of the number of cigarettes smoked per day and saliva cotinine, and examine whether misclassification was due to an inappropriate saliva cotinine cutoff point. Methods. End of pregnancy self-reports of smoking status and saliva cotinine were used to calculate misclassification rates. Results. The findings revealed that 61 of 441 self-reported smokers had biochemical values inconsistent with smoking status for a smoking misclassification rate of 13.8%. The results also revealed that 28 of 107 self-reported quitters had cotinine values consistent with smoking status for a nonsmoking misclassification rate of 26.2%. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were then plotted to determine whether misclassification resulted from an inappropriate cutoff point. The cotinine cutoff point that maximized sensitivity and specificity for all women was 24 ng/ml. Racial ROC comparisons indicated a higher cutoff point for blacks than whites. Use of any of the ROC indicated cutoff points would not change the misclassification rates. Conclusions. These findings suggest that underreporting of smoking status during pregnancy is high and that social desirability of nonsmoking status may have contributed to the lack of precision in saliva cotinine to distinguish smoking status in this study.
Maternal and Child Health Journal – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 30, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.