PPP Versus Mer: Searching for Answers in a Multi-Dimensional Debate

PPP Versus Mer: Searching for Answers in a Multi-Dimensional Debate PPP VERSUS MER: SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS IN A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL DEBATE 1 2 DETLEF P. VAN VUUREN and KNUT H. ALFSEN Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency, MNP E-mail: Detlef.van.Vuuren@mnp.nl Research Department, Statistics Norway E-mail: knut.alfsen@ssb.no 1. Introduction In 2000, Nakicenovic et al. published a set of new baseline scenarios (Special Re- port on Emission Scenarios, SRES) in response to a request from IPCC to develop reference scenarios (without explicit climate policies) (Nakicenovic, 2000). These scenarios aimed to cover a significant portion of the possible trajectories of future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their driving forces on the basis of the scenar- ios in the literature. The scenarios were developed using six of different integrated assessment models, most of them with a more-or-less physical-orientation towards the description of the drivers of future GHG emissions (energy system models; physically oriented integrated assessment models). Consistent with most of the existing literature, the economic growth in most of the SRES scenarios and their regions were reported in US dollars based on conversions using market-exchange rates (MER). In 2003, however, the use of MER-based economic projections in SRES were subject to criticism, primarily from Castles and Henderson (see, for example, (Castles and Henderson, 2003b; Castles and http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Climatic Change Springer Journals

PPP Versus Mer: Searching for Answers in a Multi-Dimensional Debate

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/ppp-versus-mer-searching-for-answers-in-a-multi-dimensional-debate-SHet19aKYQ
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Subject
Earth Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
ISSN
0165-0009
eISSN
1573-1480
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10584-005-9045-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PPP VERSUS MER: SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS IN A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL DEBATE 1 2 DETLEF P. VAN VUUREN and KNUT H. ALFSEN Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency, MNP E-mail: Detlef.van.Vuuren@mnp.nl Research Department, Statistics Norway E-mail: knut.alfsen@ssb.no 1. Introduction In 2000, Nakicenovic et al. published a set of new baseline scenarios (Special Re- port on Emission Scenarios, SRES) in response to a request from IPCC to develop reference scenarios (without explicit climate policies) (Nakicenovic, 2000). These scenarios aimed to cover a significant portion of the possible trajectories of future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their driving forces on the basis of the scenar- ios in the literature. The scenarios were developed using six of different integrated assessment models, most of them with a more-or-less physical-orientation towards the description of the drivers of future GHG emissions (energy system models; physically oriented integrated assessment models). Consistent with most of the existing literature, the economic growth in most of the SRES scenarios and their regions were reported in US dollars based on conversions using market-exchange rates (MER). In 2003, however, the use of MER-based economic projections in SRES were subject to criticism, primarily from Castles and Henderson (see, for example, (Castles and Henderson, 2003b; Castles and

Journal

Climatic ChangeSpringer Journals

Published: May 4, 2006

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off