Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K Kullmann (2012)
Zu schön, um wahr zu sein (To good to be true)Der Spiegel, 35
D. Fanelli (2010)
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the SciencesPLoS ONE, 5
P. Armitage, C. Mcpherson, B. Rowe (1969)
Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating Data, 132
R. Shavelson, Lisa Towne (2002)
Scientific Research in Education
D Kahneman (2011)
Thinking, fast and slow
Brian Nosek, Yoav Bar-Anan (2012)
Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific CommunicationPsychological Inquiry, 23
(2012)
Scientific Utopia or scientific dystopia? Psychological Inquiry
J. Asendorpf, M. Conner, F. Fruyt, J. Houwer, Jaap Denissen, K. Fiedler, S. Fiedler, D. Funder, R. Kliegl, Brian Nosek, M. Perugini, B. Roberts, Manfred Schmitt, M. Aken, H. Weber, J. Wicherts (2013)
Replication is more than hitting the lottery twiceEuropean Journal of Personality, 27
JB Kadane, MJ Schervish, T Seidenfeld (1996)
Reasoning to a foregone conclusionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 91
D. Borsboom (2006)
The attack of the psychometriciansPsychometrika, 71
J. Kadane, M. Schervish, Teddy Seidenfeld (1996)
When Several Bayesians Agree That There Will Be No Reasoning to a Foregone ConclusionPhilosophy of Science, 63
(1974)
Heuristics and Biases
R Abma (2013)
Het jaar van Levelt? (The year of Levelt?)De Psycholoog, 48
W. Piegorsch (1990)
Fisher's contributions to genetics and heredity, with special emphasis on the Gregor Mendel controversy.Biometrics, 46 4
CJ Ferguson, M Heene (2012)
A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’s aversion to the nullPerspectives on Psychological Science, 7
(2012)
Psychology’s bold initiative
H. Robbins (1952)
Some aspects of the sequential design of experimentsBulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 58
(2013)
Calls for replicability must go beyond motherhood and apple pie
E. Wagenmakers (2007)
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp valuesPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14
Max Rüeger, Peter Hürzeler (1975)
Zu schön, um wahr zu sein
C. Ferguson, M. Heene (2012)
A Vast Graveyard of Undead TheoriesPerspectives on Psychological Science, 7
K. Sijtsma (2012)
Future of Psychometrics: Ask What Psychometrics Can Do for PsychologyPsychometrika, 77
The mind of a con man. The New York Times
E. Wagenmakers, Ruud Wetzels, D. Borsboom, H.L.J. Maas, R. Kievit (2012)
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory ResearchPerspectives on Psychological Science, 7
(2012)
Editors ’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science : A crisis of confidence ?
U. Simonsohn, Leif Nelson, J. Simmons (2013)
P-Curve: A Key to the File DrawerCognitive Linguistics: Cognition
(2011)
Interim report regarding the breach of scientific integrity committed by Prof
U. Simonsohn (2013)
Just Post It: The Lesson from Two Cases of Fabricated Data Detected by Statistics AloneEmerging Research within Organizational Behavior eJournal
E. Masicampo, Daniel Lalande (2012)
A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65
U Simonsohn (2013)
Just post it: The lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statistics alonePsychological Science, 24
Melissa Anderson (2014)
Global Research Integrity in Relation to the United States' Research-Integrity InfrastructureAccountability in Research, 21
L. John, G. Loewenstein, D. Prelec (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth TellingPsychological Science, 23
M. Shermer (2010)
On Fact and Fraud: Cautionary Tales from the Front Lines of ScienceAmerican Journal of Physics, 78
Het moet ergens in die doos zitten (It has to be somewhere in that box). Nieuwe Rotterdamse Courant NRC, NRC Weekend
M. Wilson (2013)
Seeking a Balance Between the Statistical and Scientific Elements in PsychometricsPsychometrika, 78
R. Maccallum, M. Roznowski, Lawrence Necowitz (1992)
Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance.Psychological bulletin, 111 3
M. Mahoney (1977)
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review systemCognitive Therapy and Research, 1
J. Asendorpf, M. Conner, F. Fruyt, J. Houwer, Jaap Denissen, K. Fiedler, S. Fiedler, D. Funder, R. Kliegl, Brian Nosek, M. Perugini, B. Roberts, Manfred Schmitt, M. Aken, H. Weber, J. Wicherts (2013)
Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology †European Journal of Personality, 27
J. Ioannidis, T. Trikalinos (2007)
An exploratory test for an excess of significant findingsClinical Trials, 4
L. Poll-Franse, N. Horevoorts, M. Eenbergen, J. Denollet, J. Roukema, N. Aaronson, A. Vingerhoets, J. Coebergh, J. Vries, M. Essink‐bot, F. Mols (2011)
The Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship registry: scope, rationale and design of an infrastructure for the study of physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivorship cohorts.European journal of cancer, 47 14
W. Tucker (1997)
Re-reconsidering Burt: beyond a reasonable doubt.Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences, 33 2
W. Buckland (1979)
Outliers in Statistical DataJournal of the Operational Research Society, 30
(2011)
Fraud case seen as a red flag for psychology research
R. Nisbett, Joshua Aronson, C. Blair, W. Dickens, J. Flynn, D. Halpern (2014)
Public Skepticism of Psychology Why Many People Perceive the Study of Human Behavior as Unscientific
(2012)
Elkaar constructief de maat nemen ( Providing constructive criticism )
U Simonsohn, LD Nelson, J Simmons (2014)
P-Curve: A key to the file-drawerJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143
C. Schuyt, K. Algra, Roeland Nolte, F. Rosendaal (2012)
Zorgvuldig en integer omgaan met wetenschappelijke onderzoeksgegevens
J. Wicherts, D. Borsboom, J. Kats, D. Molenaar (2006)
The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis.The American psychologist, 61 7
John Ioannidis (2005)
Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2
L. Hubert, H. Wainer (2012)
A Statistical Guide for the Ethically Perplexed
(2013)
Het jaar van Stapel ( The year of Stapel )
J. Wicherts, Marjan Bakker, D. Molenaar (2011)
Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical ResultsPLoS ONE, 6
R. Fisher (1936)
Has Mendel's work been rediscovered?Annals of Science, 1
Wg.Cdr. Congpuong (2013)
How to lie With StatisticsJournal of Vector Borne Diseases, 8
W. Levelt, P. Drenth, E. Noort (2012)
Flawed science: The fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel
Heather Fuchs, M. Jenny, S. Fiedler (2012)
Psychologists Are Open to Change, yet Wary of RulesPerspectives on Psychological Science, 7
S. Lock (1999)
The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and CharacterBMJ, 319
(1974)
Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests (Introduction to the theory of psychological tests)
A. Bayer (2016)
A First Course In Probability
D. Fanelli (2013)
Redefine misconduct as distorted reportingNature, 494
Friday Schedule, Saturday Schedule, Sunday Schedule, T. Book, Signings Blog, App Twitter, Jonah Lehrer (2017)
The Truth Wears Off Is there something wrong with the scientific method ?
L. Cronbach (1954)
Report on a psychometric mission to cliniciaPsychometrika, 19
Rhodri Saunders, Julian Savulescu (2008)
Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?Journal of Medical Ethics, 34
Liv Langfeldt (2011)
How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic JudgmentInternational Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25
SO Lilienfeld (2012)
Scientific Utopia or scientific dystopia?Psychological Inquiry, 23
B. Nosek, Jeffrey Spies, Matt Motyl (2012)
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishabilityarXiv: Physics and Society
(2012)
2011).Handbook of ethics in quantitative methodology
H. Beek (2012)
F1000Prime recommendation of False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.
Marjan Bakker, A. Dijk, J. Wicherts (2012)
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological SciencePerspectives on Psychological Science, 7
D. Fanelli (2009)
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey DataPLoS ONE, 4
E. Wagenmakers, Ruud Wetzels, D. Borsboom, H.L.J. Maas (2011)
Why Psychologists Must Change the Way They Analyze Their Data: the Case of Psi: Comment on Bem (2011)
JP Simmons, LD Nelson, U Simonsohn (2011)
False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significantPsychological Science, 22
(2013)
Over de betekenis van de affaire-Stapel (The publication factory
(1995)
Bayesian model selection in social research (with Discussion)
JB Asendorpf (2013)
Authors’ response: Replication is more than hitting the lottery twiceEuropean Journal of Personality, 27
N. Steneck (2006)
Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directionsScience and Engineering Ethics, 12
Joshua Hartshorne, Adena Schachner (2011)
Tracking Replicability as a Method of Post-Publication Open EvaluationFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6
(2013)
Psychologie als wedstrijd . Integer wetenschappelijk onderzoek ( Psychology as competition . Honest scientific research )
L. (2002)
HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
Gautam Goel, Niangjun Chen, A. Wierman (2017)
Thinking fast and slow: Optimization decomposition across timescales2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
Jasiek Krzysztofiak (2012)
IN THE WAKE OF HIGH-PROFILE CONTROVERSIES, PSYCHOLOGISTS ARE FACING UP TO PROBLEMS WITH REPLICATION.
M. Kalichman (2005)
The Great Betrayal: Fraud in ScienceJAMA
Recent fraud cases in psychological and medical research have emphasized the need to pay attention to Questionable Research Practices (QRPs). Deliberate or not, QRPs usually have a deteriorating effect on the quality and the credibility of research results. QRPs must be revealed but prevention of QRPs is more important than detection. I suggest two policy measures that I expect to be effective in improving the quality of psychological research. First, the research data and the research materials should be made publicly available so as to allow verification. Second, researchers should more readily consider consulting a methodologist or a statistician. These two measures are simple but run against common practice to keep data to oneself and overestimate one’s methodological and statistical skills, thus allowing secrecy and errors to enter research practice.
Psychometrika – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 28, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.