Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Tan, D. Willoughby (1993)
Critical Mud Weight and Risk Contour Plots for Designing Inclined WellsSoftware - Practice and Experience
Hao Fang, Li Sitian, Gong Zai-sheng, Yang Jiaming (2002)
Mechanism of diapirism and episodic fluid injections in the Yinggehai BasinScience China-earth Sciences, 45
B. Eaton (1976)
Graphical method predicts geopressures worldwide
R. Hillis (2000)
Pore Pressure/Stress Coupling and its Implications for SeismicityExploration Geophysics, 31
G. Bowers (2002)
Detecting high overpressureGeophysics, 21
Wanzhong Shi, Yuhong Xie, Zhenfeng Wang, Xusheng Li, Chuanxin Tong (2013)
Characteristics of overpressure distribution and its implication for hydrocarbon exploration in the Qiongdongnan BasinJournal of Asian Earth Sciences, 66
P. Schultheiss, M. Holland, G. Humphrey (2009)
Wireline Coring and Analysis under Pressure: Recent Use and Future Developments of the HYACINTH SystemScientific Drilling, 7
P. Ruth, R. Hillis, R. Swarbrick (2002)
DETECTING OVERPRESSURE USING POROSITY-BASED TECHNIQUES IN THE CARNARVON BASIN, AUSTRALIAThe APPEA Journal, 42
R. Bastia, M. Radhakrishna, T. Srinivas, S. Nayak, D. Nathaniel, T. Biswal (2010)
Structural and tectonic interpretation of geophysical data along the Eastern Continental Margin of India with special reference to the deep water petroliferous basinsJournal of Asian Earth Sciences, 39
R. Swarbrick (2001)
Challenges of Porosity Based Pore Pressure Prediction
T. Engelder, M. Fischer (1994)
Influence of poroelastic behavior on the magnitude of minimum horizontal stress, Sh in overpressured parts of sedimentary basinsGeology, 22
S. Gupta (2006)
Basin architecture and petroleum system of Krishna Godavari Basin, east coast of IndiaGeophysics, 25
K. Rao, P. Subraelu, K. Nagakumar, G. Demudu, B. Malini, A. Rajawat, Ajai (2013)
Geomorphological implications of the basement structure in the Krishna-Godavari deltas, IndiaZeitschrift Fur Geomorphologie, 57
R Bastia (2006)
619J Geol Soc India, 67
C. Sayers, G. Johnson, G. Denyer (2001)
Predrill pore-pressure prediction using seismic dataGeophysics, 67
GL Bowers (2002)
174Lead Edge, 21
R Chatterjee (2002)
26Petrophysics, 43
R. Sarker, M. Batzle (2008)
Effective stress coefficient in shales and its applicability to Eaton's equationGeophysics, 27
D. Singha, R. Chatterjee (2014)
Detection of overpressure zones and a statistical model for pore pressure estimation from well logs in the Krishna‐Godavari Basin, IndiaGeochemistry, 15
G. Shanmugam, S. Shrivastava, B. Das (2009)
Sandy Debrites and Tidalites of Pliocene Reservoir Sands in Upper-Slope Canyon Environments, Offshore Krishna–Godavari Basin (India): ImplicationsJournal of Sedimentary Research, 79
Wei Li, Jun Xie, Xiao-hui Gao, Long-hai Zhang, Fangmiao Yu (2008)
Characteristics of Jurassic mudstone overpressure and its control on oil and gas accumulation in Turpan DepressionPetroleum Exploration and Development, 35
Joel Alnes, R. Lilburn, M. Osborne, R. Swarbrick (1998)
Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins; a reevaluation; discussion and replyAAPG Bulletin, 82
Jie Tang, I. Lerche (1993)
Geopressure evolution, hydrocarbon generation and migration in the Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin, Canada: results from two-dimensional quantitative modellingMarine and Petroleum Geology, 10
G. Anitha, M. Ramana, T. Ramprasad, P. Dewangan, M. Anuradha (2014)
Shallow geological environment of Krishna–Godavari offshore, eastern continental margin of India as inferred from the interpretation of high resolution sparker dataJournal of Earth System Science, 123
R. Bastia, Pankaj Singh, P. Nayak (2006)
Linking Shelf Delta to Deep Water; Krishna-Godavari BasinJournal of The Geological Society of India, 67
R. Chatterjee, M. Mukhopadhyay, S. Paul (2011)
Overpressure zone under the Krishna–Godavari offshore basin: geophysical implications for natural hazard in deeper-water drillingNatural Hazards, 57
S. Chopra, A. Huffman (2006)
Velocity determination for pore-pressure predictionGeophysics, 25
M. Fleming, R. Flin, K. Mearns, Rachael Gordon (1998)
Risk Perceptions of Offshore Workers on UK Oil and Gas PlatformsRisk Analysis, 18
R. Plumb, K. Evans, T. Engelder (1991)
Geophysical log responses and their correlation with bed‐to‐bed stress contrasts in Paleozoic rocks, Appalachian Plateau, New YorkJournal of Geophysical Research, 96
A. Hurst, A. Scott, M. Vigorito (2011)
Physical characteristics of sand injectitesEarth-Science Reviews, 106
R. Chatterjee (2008)
Effect of normal faulting on in-situ stress: A case study from Mandapeta Field, Krishna-Godavari basin, IndiaEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 269
R Bastia (2010)
608J Asian Earth Sci, 39
M. Radhakrishna, D. Twinkle, S. Nayak, R. Bastia, G. Rao (2012)
Crustal structure and rift architecture across the Krishna–Godavari basin in the central Eastern Continental Margin of India based on analysis of gravity and seismic dataMarine and Petroleum Geology, 37
N. Dutta (2002)
Geopressure prediction using seismic data: Current status and the road aheadGeophysics, 67
R. Chatterjee, M. Mukhopadhyay (2002)
In Situ Stress Determination Using Well Log Data For The Oil Fields Of The Krishna-godavari Basin, IndiaPetrophysics, 43
R Chatterjee (2008)
457Earth Planet Sci Lett, 269
R Chatterjee (2011)
121Nat Hazards, 57
T. Miller (1995)
New Insights on Natural Hydraulic Fractures Induced by Abnormally High Pore PressuresAAPG Bulletin, 79
M. Tingay, R. Hillis, R. Swarbrick, C. Morley, A. Damit (2009)
Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, BruneiAAPG Bulletin, 93
Jincai Zhang (2011)
Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modifications, and new approachesEarth-Science Reviews, 108
B. Sinha, T. Bratton, Jesse Cryer, Steve Nieting, G. Ugueto, A. Bakulin, M. Hauser (2008)
Estimation of Near-Wellbore Alteration and Formation Stress Parameters From Borehole Sonic DataSpe Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 11
S Chopra (2006)
1502Lead Edge, 25
R. Gholami, A. Moradzadeh, V. Rasouli, J. Hanachi (2014)
Practical application of failure criteria in determining safe mud weight windows in drilling operationsJournal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering, 6
M. Zoback, C. Barton, M. Brudy, D. Castillo, T. Finkbeiner, B. Grollimund, D. Moos, P. Peška, C. Ward, David Wiprut (2003)
Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wellsInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40
G Anitha (2014)
329J. Earth Syst Sci, 123
[An analysis for over pressure zone (OPZ) prevailing in parts of the Krishna-Godavari Basin (KG-B) at the Eastern Continental Margin of India (ECMI) is found promising from the viewpoint of its hydrocarbon potentials. Pressure coefficients estimated from pore pressure studies reveal that there is a rather extensive (lateral) OPZ in the study area than hitherto expected with maximum pressure coefficient of 1.31 or more. The stress magnitudes like vertical stress (Sv), minimum horizontal stress (Sh) and pore pressure gradient (PPG) and fracture pressure gradient (FPG) are predicted from well log data for 15 available wells distributed over an area of 6022 km2 in KG-B. The wells are drilled to depths of 3660 m on-land (#Wells 1–9) and up to 4000 m in offshore (#Wells 10–15). The PPG ranges from 11.85 to 13.10 MPa/km, whereas, the FPG varies from 17.40 to 19.78 MPa/km in sediments penetrated by the wells displaying normal pressured sediment to a significantly higher value of 19.78 MPa/km for the over-pressured sediments. The values of vertical stress gradient (VSG) varies from 14.67 to 23.10 MPa/km, whereas, the values of Sh magnitude varies from 64 to 77 % of the Sv in normally-pressured to over-pressured sediments. VSG, PPG and FPG tend to decrease with corresponding increase in water column for the studied offshore wells. These results are utilized for constructing contour maps for observing the variations in the VSG and in the OPZ-top, also for constructing PPG contour map in 3D along the vertical section connecting all 15 wells extending from onshore to offshore regions. Any significant increase in pore pressure means the decrease of effective horizontal stress in respect of depth. As a result, the safety windows or safe mud-weight windows (the difference between PPG and FPG corresponding to particular depth interval in a well) will also decrease with the increase of PPG and FPG. Analytical approach adopted above is then critically examined to recommend how a priori steps based on petrophysical characters of a formation are closely monitored in time and optimum mud weight maintained during drilling.]
Published: May 20, 2015
Keywords: Pore Pressure; Minimum Horizontal Stress; Pore Pressure Gradient; Repeat Formation Tester; Vertical Stress Gradient
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.