Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Tx Station (2001)
Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.
D. Kilpatrick, H. Resnick, M. Milanak, Mark Miller, K. Keyes, M. Friedman (2013)
National estimates of exposure to traumatic events and PTSD prevalence using DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria.Journal of traumatic stress, 26 5
Karen Roberts, T. Hart, J. Eastwood (2010)
Attentional Biases to Social and Health Threat Words in Individuals With and Without High Social Anxiety or DepressionCognitive Therapy and Research, 34
J. Beck, J. Freeman, J. Shipherd, J. Hamblen, J. Lackner (2001)
Specificity of Stroop interference in patients with pain and PTSD.Journal of abnormal psychology, 110 4
P. Seemann (2014)
Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems
James Carroll, Michelle Yik, J. Russell, L. Barrett (1999)
On the Psychometric Principles of AffectReview of General Psychology, 3
R. Hazen, M. Vasey, N. Schmidt (2009)
Attentional retraining: a randomized clinical trial for pathological worry.Journal of psychiatric research, 43 6
Maartje Schoorl, P. Putman, T. Mooren, S. Werff, W. Does (2014)
Attentional bias modification in Dutch veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder--a case series with a personalized treatment version.Journal of traumatic stress, 27 2
G. Siegle, S. Steinhauer, M. Thase, V. Stenger, C. Carter (2002)
Can’t shake that feeling: event-related fMRI assessment of sustained amygdala activity in response to emotional information in depressed individualsBiological Psychiatry, 51
A. Rashid, I. Albert, D. Cosley, S. Lam, S. McNee, J. Konstan, J. Riedl (2002)
Getting to know you: learning new user preferences in recommender systems
(2002)
Selective attention and emotional vulnerability
Avi Fleischer, A. Mead, Jialin Huang (2015)
Inattentive Responding in MTurk and Other Online SamplesIndustrial and Organizational Psychology, 8
P. Lang (1995)
International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings
Richard Chambers, B. Lo, N. Allen (2008)
The Impact of Intensive Mindfulness Training on Attentional Control, Cognitive Style, and AffectCognitive Therapy and Research, 32
Michael Buhrmester, T. Kwang, S. Gosling (2011)
Amazon's Mechanical TurkPerspectives on Psychological Science, 6
C. Aggarwal (2016)
Recommender Systems
C. MacLeod, E. Rutherford, Lynlee Campbell, Greg Ebsworthy, Lin Holker (2002)
Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias.Journal of abnormal psychology, 111 1
Z. Shao, E. Janse, K. Visser, A. Meyer (2014)
What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adultsFrontiers in Psychology, 5
M. Bradley, P. Lang (1994)
Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25 1
T. Ehring, A. Ehlers (2010)
Enhanced Priming for Trauma-Related Words Predicts Posttraumatic Stress DisorderJournal of Abnormal Psychology, 120
M. Bradley, P. Lang (1999)
Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings
E. Kensinger, S. Corkin (2003)
Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words?Memory & Cognition, 31
N. Amir, Jennie Kuckertz, Marlene Strege (2016)
A Pilot Study of an Adaptive, Idiographic, and Multi-Component Attention Bias Modification Program for Social Anxiety DisorderCognitive Therapy and Research, 40
J. McGeary, Sydney Meadows, N. Amir, B. Gibb (2014)
Computer-delivered, home-based, attentional retraining reduces drinking behavior in heavy drinkers.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 28 2
Christina Fridrici, Carmen Leichsenring-Driessen, M. Driessen, K. Wingenfeld, Georg Kremer, T. Beblo (2013)
The individualized alcohol Stroop task: no attentional bias toward personalized stimuli in alcohol-dependents.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 27 1
D. Swick (2012)
The Separate and Cumulative Effects of TBI and PTSD on Cognitive Function and Emotional Control
E. Carlson, S. Smith, P. Palmieri, C. Dalenberg, J. Ruzek, R. Kimerling, T. Burling, D. Spain (2011)
Development and validation of a brief self-report measure of trauma exposure: the Trauma History Screen.Psychological assessment, 23 2
N. Amir, C. Beard, M. Burns, J. Bomyea (2009)
Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder.Journal of abnormal psychology, 118 1
S. Bunnell (2007)
The Impact of Abuse Exposure on Memory Processes and Attentional Biases in a College-Aged Sample
C. MacLeod, Lih Soong, E. Rutherford, Lynlee Campbell (2007)
Internet-delivered assessment and manipulation of anxiety-linked attentional bias: validation of a free-access attentional probe software package.Behavior research methods, 39 3
R. Team (2014)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.MSOR connections, 1
M. Nadimi-Shahraki, Mozhde Bahadorpour (2014)
Cold-start Problem in Collaborative Recommender Systems: Efficient Methods Based on Ask-to-rate TechniqueJ. Comput. Inf. Technol., 22
N. Amir, Charles Taylor (2012)
Combining computerized home-based treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: an attention modification program and cognitive behavioral therapy.Behavior therapy, 43 3
C Aggarwal (2016)
Recommender systems: The textbook
S. Kousta, D. Vinson, G. Vigliocco (2009)
Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral wordsCognition, 112
I. Blix, T. Brennen (2011)
Intentional Forgetting of Emotional Words after Trauma: A Study with Victims of Sexual AssaultFrontiers in Psychology, 2
Experimental paradigms used in affective and clinical science often use stimuli such as images, scenarios, videos, or words to elicit emotional responses in study participants. Choosing appropriate stimuli that are highly evocative is essential to the study of emotional processes in both healthy and clinical populations. Selecting one set of stimuli that will be relevant for all subjects can be challenging because not every person responds the same way to a given stimulus. Machine learning can facilitate the personalization of such stimuli. The current study applied a novel statistical approach called a recommender algorithm to the selection of highly threatening words for a trauma-exposed population (N = 837). Participants rated 513 threatening words, and we trained a user–user collaborative filtering recommender algorithm. The algorithm uses similarities between individuals to predict ratings for unrated words. We compared threat ratings for algorithm-based word selection to a random word set, a word set previously used in research, and trauma-specific word sets. Algorithm-selected personalized words were more threatening compared to non-personalized words with large effects (ds = 2.10–2.92). Recommender algorithms can automate the personalization of stimuli from a large pool of possible stimuli to maximize emotional reactivity in research paradigms. These methods also hold potential for the personalization of behavioral treatments administered remotely where a provider is not available to tailor an intervention to the individual. The word personalization algorithm is available for use online ( https://threat-word-predictor.herokuapp.com/ ).
Cognitive Therapy and Research – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 2, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.