Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Workman, J. Niswander (1970)
Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago.American journal of human genetics, 22 1
S. Wright (1943)
Isolation by Distance.Genetics, 28 2
Roger Dennis, Chris Thomas (2000)
Bias in Butterfly Distribution Maps: The Influence of Hot Spots and Recorder's Home RangeJournal of Insect Conservation, 4
H. Levene (1949)
On a matching problem in geneticsAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 20
(1995)
1468 an example from the Pieris napi group ( Lepidoptera : Pieridae ) in Europe
L.E. Gilbert (1984)
The Biology of Butterflies
(1998)
Landranger 139: Birmingham and Wolverhampton
E. Figurny-Puchalska, Rebekka Gadeberg, J. Boomsma (2000)
Comparison of genetic population structure of the large blue butterflies Maculinea nausithous and M. teleiusBiodiversity & Conservation, 9
A. Erhardt, J. Thomas (1991)
9 – Lepidoptera as Indicators of Change in the Semi-natural Grasslands of Lowland and Upland Europe
I. Hanski, C. Thomas (1994)
Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterfliesBiological Conservation, 68
H. Levene (1949)
On a Matching Problem Arising in GeneticsAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 20
中村 康弘 (2001)
The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland, Asher, J., Warren, M., Fox, R., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G. and Jeffcoate, S., 26×21cm, 433頁(原色図版多数), 発行:Oxford University Press, UK., 発行日:2001年3月, 定価:$50(£30)
F.J. Rohlf (1997)
Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System
I. Hanski, M. Gilpin (1991)
Metapopulation dynamics: a brief his-tory and conceptual domain
B. Wood, M. Gillman (1998)
The effects of disturbance on forest butterflies using two methods of sampling in TrinidadBiodiversity & Conservation, 7
R. Greenberg (1969)
BiometryThe Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 42
R. Dennis, H. Eales (1997)
Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolationJournal of Insect Conservation, 1
J. Bossart, J. Scriber (1995)
MAINTENANCE OF ECOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT GENETIC VARIATION IN THE TIGER SWALLOWTAIL BUTTERFLY THROUGH DIFFERENTIAL SELECTION AND GENE FLOWEvolution, 49
A. Erhardt, J.A. Thomas (1991)
The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats
R. Dennis, T. Shreeve (1997)
Diversity of butterflies on British islands: ecological influences underlying the roles of area, isolation and the size of the faunal sourceBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 60
柴谷 篤弘 (1995)
Jeremy Thomas, Richard Lewington The Butterflies of Britain & Ireland. The National Trust/Dorling Kindersley, London (1991)
D. Goulson (1993)
Allozyme variation in the butterfly, Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) (L.): evidence for selectionHeredity, 71
C. Thomas, T. Jones (1993)
Partial recovery of a skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) from population refuges : lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscapeJournal of Animal Ecology, 62
J. Johannesen, M. Veith, A. Seitz (1996)
Population genetic structure of the butterfly Melitaea didyma (Nymphalidae) along a northern distribution range borderMolecular Ecology, 5
S. Wright (1950)
Genetical structure of populations.Nature, 166 4215
E. Meglécz, K. Pecsenye, L. Peregovits, Z. Varga (1997)
Allozyme variation in Parnassius mnemosyne (L.) (Lepidoptera) populations in North-East Hungary: variation within a subspecies groupGenetica, 101
I. Hanski (1994)
Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes.Trends in ecology & evolution, 9 4
(1997)
NTSYS-pc V
(1984)
The structure and dynamics of butterfly populations
M. Napolitano, H. Descimon (1994)
Genetic structure of French populations of the mountain butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)Biological Journal of The Linnean Society, 53
M. Raymond, F. Rousset (1995)
AN EXACT TEST FOR POPULATION DIFFERENTIATIONEvolution, 49
B. Richardson, P. Baverstock, M. Adams, M. King (1988)
Allozyme Electrophoresis: A Handbook for Animal Systematics and Population Studies
(1993)
PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) V
J.A. Thomas, R. Lewington (1991)
The Butterflies of Britain and Ireland
(1984)
The biology of butterfly communities
D. Debinski (1994)
Genetic diversity assessment in a metapopulation of the butterfly Euphydryas gillettiiBiological Conservation, 70
Chris Thomas (1991)
Spatial and temporal variability in a butterfly populationOecologia, 87
(1993)
anthropologie.unigie.ch /LGB/software /win /min-span-net
(2000)
Biodiversity Action Plan for Birmingham and the Black Country
(1997)
A Nature Conservation Strategy for Birmingham
K. Brown (1991)
14 – Conservation of Neotropical Environments: Insects as Indicators
(2001)
Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland
(1998)
Landranger
A. Porter, H. Geiger (1995)
Limitations to the inference of gene flow at regional geographic scales—an example from the Pieris napi group (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in EuropeBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 54
Some species cope with, and survive in, urban areas better than others.From a conservation viewpoint it is important to understand why some species arerare or are excluded in the urban landscape, in order that we might take actionto conserve and restore species. Two ecological factors that might explain thedistribution and abundance of butterfly species in the urban landscape aredispersal ability and the availability of suitable habitat. The influence ofthese factors was assessed by examining the distribution and genetic structureof four grassland butterfly species in the West Midlands conurbation, UK. Thefour species differ in their distribution and abundance, mobility and habitatspecificity. No significant fit to the isolation-by-distance model was found forany of the study species at this spatial scale. MeanF ST values revealed a non-significant level ofpopulation structuring for two species, Pieris napi (L.)and Maniola jurtina (L.), but moderate and significantpopulation differentiation for Pyronia tithonus (L.) andCoenonympha pamphilus (L.). Results suggest that thesespecies are limited more by the availability of suitable habitat than by theirability to move among habitat patches. Conservation strategies for thesegrassland species should initially focus on the creation and appropriatemanagement of suitable habitat. More sedentary species that have already beenexcluded from the conurbation may require a more complex strategy for theirsuccessful restoration.
Biodiversity and Conservation – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 12, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.