Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2016)
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council. Second report on relocation and resettlement, COM(2016) 222 final
(2016)
Klage, eingereicht am 3. Dezember 2015 – Ungarn/Rat der Europäischen Union
S Anagnost (2000)
Challenges facing asylum system policy development in Europe: preliminary lessons learned from the central European and the baltic states (CEBS)International Journal of Refugee Law, 12
J Segeš-Frelak (2015)
Refugees in Poland: the sound of silence
C Taylor (1993)
Bourdieu: critical perspectives
Z Hesová (2016)
Tschechien: „Kein Land für Migranten“Welttrends, 117
(2002)
Regular report on Poland’s progress towards accession
A Mehler (2016)
Handbuch Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
(2003)
Comprehensive monitoring report on Poland’s preparations for membership
(2017)
Czechia
A Kicinger, A Weinar, A Górny (2007)
The Europeanization of national policies and politics of immigration. Between autonomy and the European Union
A Malangone (2015)
Slovak migration policy poisoned by hypocrisy
A Wiener (2014)
A theory of contestation
CEE Identity (2013)
Polish People’s Party (Polske Stronnictwo Ludowe, PSL)
B Loges (2013)
Schutz als neue Norm in den internationalen Beziehungen
V Fajth (2015)
One step forward, two steps back: asylum issues in Hungary
(2015)
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A European agenda on migration, COM(2015) 240 final
(2013)
Christian and Democratic Union – Czechoslovak People’s Party (Křesťanská a demokratická unie – Československá strana lidová, KDU-ČSL)
(2015)
Western Balkans Quarterly. Quarter 2
(2016)
Czech minister: our migration policy is now mainstream
(2002)
Regular report on Hungary’s progress towards accession
(2015)
EU forces through refugee deal
(2002)
Regular report on Slovakia’s progress towards accession
(2015)
Joint statement of the heads of government of the Visegrad group countries
(1998)
Regular report from the commission on Poland’s progress towards accession
A Körösényi, GG Fodor (2004)
Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas
(2015)
Remarks by President Donald Tusk after the European Council meeting of 15 October 2015
M Finnemore, K Sikkink (1998)
International norm dynamics and political changeInternational Organization, 52
G Brunner (1999)
Das Recht der nationalen Minderheiten in Osteuropa
CEE Identity (2013)
Civic Platform (Platforma Obywatelska, PO)
CEE Identity (2013)
Česká strana sociálně demokratická, ČSSD
H Wiarda (2005)
Comparative politics. Critical concepts in political science
D Jahn (2013)
Einführung in die vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
H Grabbe (2003)
The politics of Europeanization
R Axelrod (1986)
An evolutionary approach to normsAmerican Political Science Review, 80
(2015)
Poland won’t relocate migrants after Paris attacks
(2015)
Parlemeter 2015 – Part I.The main challenges for the EU, migration, and the economic and social situation
(2007)
A stronger Hungary. The manifesto of Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Union
(2015)
Attitudes to refuges in Visegrad Group countries
I Gödri, B Soltész, B Bodacz-Nagy (2014)
Immigration or emigration country? Migration trends and their socio-economic background in Hungary: a longer-term historical perspective
(2017)
First instance decisions by outcome and recognition rates, 1st quarter 2017
L Szőke (1992)
Hungarian perspectives on emigration and immigration in the new European architectureInternational Migration Review, 26
Z Pavelková (2015)
Quarrelling over 15 Syrian children: how security definitively replaced rights in the Czech debate on asylum
F Schimmelfennig, G Schwellnus (2011)
Regierungssysteme in Mittel- und Osteuropas. Die neuen EU-Staaten im Vergleich
G Falkner, M Hartlapp, S Leiber, O Treib (2004)
Non-compliance with EU directives in the member states: opposition through the backdoor?West European Politics, 27
B Soltész, Á Erőss, D Karácsonyi, Á Kincses (2014)
Discovering migration between Visegrad countries and eastern partners. Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Belarus, Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova on the eastern edges of the Schengen area
S Lavenex (2001)
The Europeanization of refugee policies: normative challenges and institutional legaciesJournal of Common Market Studies, 39
(2015)
Klage, eingereicht am 2. Dezember 2015 – Slowakische Republik/Rat der Europäischen Union
(2013)
Direction – Social Democracy (Smer – Sociálna demokracia, Smer – SD)
(2011)
Wybory 2011 do Sejmu i Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
K Miciukiewicz (2011)
(Post)transformational migration. Inequalities, welfare state and horizontal mobility
L Najšlová, A Balcer, R Murray, Z Végh (2016)
Should we upgrade the V4-Turkey dialogue?
Á Erőss (2014)
Introduction
U Korkut (2014)
The migration myth in the absence of immigrants: how does the conservative right in Hungary and Turkey grapple with immigration?Comparative European Politics, 12
A Wiener, G Schwellnus (2004)
Contested norms in the process of EU enlargement: non-discrimination and minority rightsConstitutionalism Web-Papers, 2
(2002)
Regular report on the Czech Republic’s progress towards accession
(2017)
Relocation and resettlement
M Przybylska (2016)
Situation in Poland
S Riishøj (2010)
The civic platform in Poland – the first decade 2001–2011
A Björkdahl (2002)
Norms in international relations, some conceptual and methodological reflectionsCambridge Review of International Affairs, 15
(2013)
Action of Dissatisfied Citizens, 2011 (Akce nespokojených občanů, ANO)
(2017)
EU’s Tusk „threatened Poland“ over refugees: gov’t spokesman
K Blusz, P Zerka, P Demeš, M Vít (2016)
Germany and the V4 moving further apart?
Als im September 2015 der europäische Verteilungsmechanismus für Flüchtlinge (EVM) verabschiedet wurde, opponierte die regionale Ländergruppe der Visegrád-Staaten (V4) gegen den Ratsbeschluss und verweigerte dessen Implementation. In einer intraregionalen Vergleichsstudie wird deshalb der Frage nachgegangen, ob die Visegrád-Gruppe gemeinsam gegen den EVM kontestiert und welche Ursachen für die Kontestation in den jeweiligen Regierungskonstellationen und der Bevölkerungsmeinung identifiziert werden können. Insbesondere die Fortschrittsberichte der Kommission zum EVM stellen dafür eine wichtige Datengrundlage dar.Eine gemeinsame Kontestation kann schlussendlich nicht bestätigt werden und auch die Regierungskonstellationen und Bevölkerungsmeinungen variieren in den V4.
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 15, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.