Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Lenton, N. Vaughan (2009)
The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering optionsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9
J. Gregory, J. Mitchell (1997)
The climate response to CO2 of the Hadley Centre coupled AOGCM with and without flux adjustmentGeophysical Research Letters, 24
B. Henley, A. King (2017)
Trajectories toward the 1.5°C Paris target: Modulation by the Interdecadal Pacific OscillationGeophysical Research Letters, 44
P. Rasch, S. Tilmes, R. Turco, A. Robock, L. Oman, Chih‐Chieh Chen, G. Stenchikov, R. Garcia (2008)
An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosolsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366
Isaac Held, Michael Winton, Ken Takahashi, T. Delworth, F. Zeng, G. Vallis (2010)
Probing the Fast and Slow Components of Global Warming by Returning Abruptly to Preindustrial ForcingJournal of Climate, 23
E. Jansen, J. Overpeck, K. Briffa, J. Duplessy, F. Joos, Masson-Delmotte, D. Olago, B. Otto‐Bliesner, W. Peltier, S. Rahmstorf, R. Ramesh, D. Raynud, D. Rind, O. Solomina, R. Villalba, De‐ming Zhang (2007)
The Physical Science Basis
P. Irvine, B. Kravitz, M. Lawrence, H. Muri (2016)
An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineeringWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7
D. MacMartin, B. Kravitz, David Keith, A. Jarvis (2014)
Dynamics of the coupled human–climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineeringClimate Dynamics, 43
S. Schiavon, R. Zecchin (2007)
Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(2009)
Global warming mitigation by means of controlled aerosol emissions into stratosphere: Global and regional of temperature response as estimated in IAP RAS CM simulations
B. Kravitz, D. MacMartin, D. Leedal, P. Rasch, Andrew Jarvis (2014)
Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineeringEnvironmental Research Letters, 9
B. Kravitz, K. Caldeira, O. Boucher, A. Robock, P. Rasch, K. Alterskjær, D. Karam, J. Cole, C. Curry, J. Haywood, P. Irvine, D. Ji, A. Jones, J. Kristjánsson, D. Lunt, J. Moore, U. Niemeier, H. Schmidt, M. Schulz, Balwinder Singh, S. Tilmes, S. Watanabe, Shuting Yang, Jinho Yoon (2013)
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118
P. Crutzen (2006)
Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?Climatic Change, 77
(2011)
the feasibility of implementation,” Problemy Ekol
(2017)
Sensitivity of zero-dimension climate model and its feedback in the context of the problem of the weather and climate control,
(2009)
An overview and update,” Phil
J. Hansen, A. Lacis, R. Ruedy, Makiko Sato (1992)
Potential climate impact of Mount Pinatubo eruptionGeophysical Research Letters, 19
O. Geoffroy, D. Saint‐Martin, D. Oliviè, A. Voldoire, G. Bellon, S. Tyteca (2013)
Transient Climate Response in a Two-Layer Energy-Balance Model. Part I: Analytical Solution and Parameter Calibration Using CMIP5 AOGCM ExperimentsJournal of Climate, 26
A. Chernokul’skii, A. Eliseev, I. Mokhov (2010)
Analytical estimations of the efficiency of climate warming prevention by controlled aerosol emissions into the stratosphereRussian Meteorology and Hydrology, 35
M. Meinshausen, S. Smith, K. Calvin, J. Daniel, M. Kainuma, J. Lamarque, Kinzo Matsumoto, S. Montzka, S. Raper, K. Riahi, A. Thomson, G. Velders, D. Vuuren (2011)
The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300Climatic Change, 109
B. Kravitz, A. Robock, S. Tilmes, O. Boucher, J. English, P. Irvine, A. Jones, M. Lawrence, M. Maccracken, H. Muri, J. Moore, U. Niemeier, S. Phipps, J. Sillmann, T. Storelvmo, Hailong Wang, S. Watanabe (2015)
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary resultsGeoscientific Model Development, 8
(2014)
Simulation of stabilization of the global climate via controllable emissions of stratospheric aserosols,
Y. Izráel', A. Ryaboshapko, N. Petrov (2009)
Comparative analysis of geo-engineering approaches to climate stabilizationRussian Meteorology and Hydrology, 34
A. Jarvis, D. Leedal, James Taylor, P. Young (2009)
Stabilizing global mean surface temperature: A feedback control perspectiveEnviron. Model. Softw., 24
Katsumasa Tanaka, B. O’Neill (2018)
The Paris Agreement zero-emissions goal is not always consistent with the 1.5 °C and 2 °C temperature targetsNature Climate Change, 8
P. J. Irvine, B. Kravitz, M. G. Lawrence, H. Muri (2016)
An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineeringWIREs Clim. Change, 7
R. Bellamy, J. Chilvers, N. E. Vaughan, T. M. Lenton (2012)
A review of climate geoengineering appraisalsWIREs Clim. Change, 3
(2015)
Simulation design and preliminary results,” Geosci
(2009)
Global and RIC AND OCEANIC OPTICS Vol
A. Jarvis, P. Young, D. Leedal, A. Chotai (2005)
A robust sequential CO 2 emissions strategy based on optimal control of atmospheric CO 2 concentrations
K. Taylor, R. Stouffer, G. Meehl (2012)
An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment designBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93
(1974)
Technique for climate impact
(2005)
Efficacy of climate forcing,
(2018)
Climate Intervention Requires Enhanced Research, Consideration of Societal and Environmental Impacts, and Policy Development
(2005)
An efficient way to regulate the global climate is the main objective of the solution of the climate problem
L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelidze, E. F. Mishchenko (1969)
Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes
D. Jacob, L. Kotova, C. Teichmann, S. Sobolowski, R. Vautard, C. Donnelly, A. Koutroulis, M. Grillakis, I. Tsanis, Andrea Damm, A. Sakalli, M. Vliet (2018)
Climate Impacts in Europe Under +1.5°C Global WarmingEarth's Future, 6
(2008)
Impact of natural and anthropogenic aerosols on the global and regional climates
(2006)
A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma?,” Clim
(2011)
Climate geoengineering: the feasibility of implementation
A. Robock, A. Marquardt, B. Kravitz, G. Stenchikov (2009)
Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineeringGeophysical Research Letters, 36
G. Ban-Weiss, K. Caldeira (2010)
Geoengineering as an optimization problemEnvironmental Research Letters, 5
David Keith (2000)
Geoengineering the Climate: History and Prospect 1The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy
K. Caldeira, G. Bala (2017)
Reflecting on 50 years of geoengineering researchEarth's Future, 5
J. Rogelj, M. Elzen, N. Höhne, T. Fransen, Hanna Fekete, H. Winkler, R. Schaeffer, Fu Sha, K. Riahi, M. Meinshausen (2016)
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °CNature, 534
(2012)
Climate responses simulated by four earth system models,” Earth Syst
D. MacMartin, K. Ricke, David Keith (2017)
Solar Geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5C Paris target, 2017
D. MacMartin, David Keith, B. Kravitz, K. Caldeira (2013)
Management of trade-offs in geoengineering through optimal choice of non-uniform radiative forcingNature Climate Change, 3
P. Brown, K. Caldeira (2017)
Greater future global warming inferred from Earth’s recent energy budgetNature, 552
(2017)
Modulation by the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation,” Geophys
A. Raftery, Alec Zimmer, D. Frierson, R. Startz, Peiran Liu (2017)
Less Than 2 °C Warming by 2100 UnlikelyNature climate change, 7
D. W. Keith (2000)
Geoengineering the climate: History and prospectAnnu. Rev. Energy Environ., 25
S. Soldatenko (2017)
Weather and Climate Manipulation as an Optimal Control for Adaptive Dynamical SystemsComplex., 2017
Y. Izráel', E. Volodin, S. Kostrykin, A. Revokatova, A. Ryaboshapko (2014)
The ability of stratospheric climate engineering in stabilizing global mean temperatures and an assessment of possible side effectsAtmospheric Science Letters, 15
J. Shepherd (2012)
Geoengineering the climate: an overview and updatePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370
(2009)
A feedback control perspective,” Environ
H. Schmidt, K. Alterskjær, D. Karam, O. Boucher, A. Jones, J. Kristjánsson, U. Niemeier, M. Schulz, A. Aaheim, F. Benduhn, M. Lawrence, C. Timmreck (2012)
Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO2: climate responses simulated by four earth system modelsEarth System Dynamics Discussions, 3
G. Siouris (1979)
Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and ControlIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9
R. Bellamy, J. Chilvers, N. Vaughan, T. Lenton (2012)
A review of climate geoengineering appraisalsWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3
B. Kravitz, A. Robock, O. Boucher, H. Schmidt, K. Taylor, G. Stenchikov, M. Schulz (2011)
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)Atmospheric Science Letters, 12
J. Gregory (2000)
Vertical heat transports in the ocean and their effect on time-dependent climate changeClimate Dynamics, 16
ISSN 1024-8560, Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, 2019, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 55–63. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2019. Russian Text © S.A. Soldatenko, R.M. Yusupov, 2018, published in Optika Atmosfery i Okeana. ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION, OPTICAL WEATHER, AND CLIMATE Optimal Control for the Process of Using Artif icial Sulfate Aerosols for Mitigating Global Warming a, a, S. A. Soldatenko * and R. M. Yusupov ** St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 199178 Russia *e-mail: prof.soldatenko@yandex.ru **e-mail: yusupov@iias.spb.su Received July 23, 2018; revised July 23, 2018; accepted August 20, 2018 Abstract—The optimal control problem for deliberate intervention in the Earth’s climate system with the aim of stabilizing the global surface temperature is considered. The deliberate action on the climate system is implemented via the controlled radiative disturbance created by artificial aerosols injected into the strato- sphere. The controlled object is described by a two-component energy-balance model subject to radiative action caused by an increase in the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The human impact on the climate system is specified in accordance with Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenar- ios, as well as with the scenario corresponding to a 1% increase in atmospheric
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics – Springer Journals
Published: May 15, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.