Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1992)
Sensitivity of tiltrotor high speed performance to wing structural parameters
E. Albano, W. Rodden (1969)
A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows.AIAA Journal, 7
Nanhao Zhu, I. O’Connor (2013)
iMASKO: A Genetic Algorithm Based Optimization Framework for Wireless Sensor NetworksJ. Sens. Actuator Networks, 2
K. Deb (2001)
Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms
(2013)
AIAA education series. American Institute of Aeronautics
Jae-Ik Lim, Taeseong Kim, Sang-Joon Shin (2011)
Structural Integrity Design of a Composite Wing in a Tiltrotor Aircraft
E. Bruhn (1973)
Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures
Jae-Sang Park, S. Jung, Myeong-Kyu Lee, Jaimoo Kim (2010)
Design optimization framework for tiltrotor composite wings considering whirl flutter stabilityComposites Part B-engineering, 41
W. Johnson (1974)
Dynamics of tilting proprotor aircraft in cruise flight
(2021)
American Helicopter Society vertical lift aircraft design conference, San Francisco, CA
M. Nixon (1993)
Parametric Studies for Tiltrotor Aeroelastic Stability in Highspeed FlightJournal of The American Helicopter Society, 38
J. Cecrdle (2015)
Whirl fluttler of turboprop aircraft structures
K. Nasu (1986)
Tilt-rotor flutter control in cruise flight
(2018)
CLEAN SKY 2 joint undertaking third amended bi-annual work plan and budget 2018-2019, annex to decision CS-GB-2019-04-09 decision third amended and
R. Harder, R. Desmarais (1972)
Interpolation using surface splines.Journal of Aircraft, 9
M. Nixon (2006)
Book Review: Rotary Wing Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity, 2nd Edition by Richard L. BielawaJournal of The American Helicopter Society, 51
J. Paik, F. Gandhi (2010)
Design Optimization for Improved Soft In-Plane Tiltrotor Aeroelastic in Airplane ModeJournal of Aircraft, 47
T. Dracopoulos, H. Öz (1988)
Integrated Aeroelastic Control Optimization
R. Bielawa (1992)
Rotary wing structural dynamics and aeroelasticity
(2000)
Calculation of tilt rotor aeroacoustic model, performance, airloads, and structural loads
J. Cecrdle (2015)
Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and whirl flutter
C. Acree, W. Johnson (2006)
Performance, Loads and Stability of Heavy Lift Tiltrotors
R. Bielawa (2006)
Rotary Wing Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity, Second Edition
T. Dracopoulos (1988)
Aeroelastic control of composite lifting surfaces : integrated aeroelastic control optimization /
Taeseong Kim, Jae-Ik Lim, Sang-Joon Shin, Do-Hyung Kim (2013)
Structural design optimization of a tiltrotor aircraft composite wing to enhance whirl flutter stabilityComposite Structures, 95
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
K. Deb, S. Agrawal, Amrit Pratap, T. Meyarivan (2002)
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-IIIEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6
The T-WING project is a Clean Sky 2 research project aimed at designing, manufacturing, qualifying and flight-testing the new wing of the Next-Generation Civil Tiltrotor Technology Demonstrator (NGCTR-TD), as part of the Fast Rotorcraft Innovative Aircraft Demonstrator Platforms (FRC IADP) activities. Requirements, design strategy, methodology and main steps followed to achieve the composite wing preliminary design are presented. The main driving requirements have been expressed in terms of dynamic requirements (e.g., limitations on natural frequencies), aeroelastic requirements, i.e., compliance with European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) CS-25 and CS-29 Airworthiness Requirements), structural requirements (e.g., target wing structural mass), functional requirements (e.g., fuel tanks, accessibility, assembly and integration, etc.) and wing preliminary loads. Based on the above-mentioned requirements, the first design loop is performed by targeting an optimal wing structure able to withstand preliminary design loads, and simultaneously with stiffness and inertia distributions leading to a configuration free from flutter within the flight envelope. The outcome from the first design loop is then used to refine the model and compute more reliable flight loads and repeat aeroelastic analysis, returning further requirements to be fulfilled in terms of wing stiffness and inertia distributions. The process is iterated till the fulfillment of all the project requirements.
International Journal of Aeronautical & Space Sciences – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 12, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.