Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The Authors report their experience on the use of bone substitutes in association with the use of PRP in the treatment of aseptic nonunion. It should be emphasized, for the purposes of healing, the crucial role of primary stabilization of the outbreak and the major inductive stimulus provided by the additional biologic support in the biologically inactive atrophic forms. They reiterate the importance, in order to choose the most suitable treatment, of a correct classification of the patient and pseudoarthrosis. Three significant cases of nonunion are described, extrapolated among those treated from 2010 to 2013 at the P.O. Piedimonte Matese.
Archivio di Ortopedia e Reumatologia – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 10, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.