Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2008)
Where is January? The month
Mark Price, R. Mentzoni (2008)
Where is January? The month-SNARC effect in sequence-form synaesthetesCortex, 44
J. Cantlon, M. Platt, E. Brannon (2009)
Beyond the number domainTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 13
W. Gevers, B. Reynvoet, W. Fias (2004)
The Mental Representation of Ordinal Sequences is Spatially Organised: Evidence from Days of the WeekCortex, 40
D. Bächtold, Martin Baumüller, P. Brugger (1998)
Stimulus-response compatibility in representational spaceNeuropsychologia, 36
(2008)
Where is January? The month652
R. Kadosh, J. Lammertyn, Véronique Izard (2008)
Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representationProgress in Neurobiology, 84
S. Shaki, W. Petrusic (2005)
On the mental representation of negative numbers: Context-dependent SNARC effects with comparative judgmentsPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12
M. Nicholls, A. Loftus, W. Gevers (2008)
Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attentionPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15
M. Fischer (2001)
Number processing induces spatial performance biasesNeurology, 57
B. Hommel, J. Pratt, L. Colzato, R. Godijn (2001)
Symbolic Control of Visual AttentionPsychological Science, 12
A. Loftus, M. Nicholls, J. Mattingley, Heidi Chapman, J. Bradshaw (2009)
Pseudoneglect for the Bisection of Mental Number LinesQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62
(2001)
Number processing induces spatial perfor
(2004)
The mental represen624
(1993)
The mental represen - 593 tation of parity and number magnitude
(2008)
Attentional SNARC: There’s something
Michael Dodd, Daryl Wilson (2009)
Training attention: Interactions between central cues and reflexive attentionVisual Cognition, 17
Michael Dodd, S. Stigchel, M. Leghari, Gery Fung, A. Kingstone (2008)
Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways)Cognition, 108
(2004)
Notational 643 modulation of the SNARC and the MARC ( linguistic marked - 644 ness of response codes ) effect
W. Fias (1996)
The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC EffectMathematical Cognition, 2
J. Tipples (2002)
Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrowsPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9
(2005)
On the mental representation of 661 negative numbers : Context - dependent SNARC effects with 662 comparative judgments
M. Eimer (1997)
Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidenceBiological Psychology, 46
(2005)
Do negative numbers
(2008)
Look , no 639 hands : A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces 640 shifts of attention
(2003)
The mental represen621
C. Snider (2004)
Room for a view: The eyesCanadian Medical Association Journal, 171
B. Gibson, A. Kingstone (2006)
Visual Attention and the Semantics of SpacePsychological Science, 17
(2005)
Do negative numbers have a 615
H. Nuerk, Wiebke Iversen, K. Willmes (2004)
Notational Modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (Linguistic Markedness of Response Codes) EffectQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57
S. Dehaene, Serge Bossini, P. Giraux (1993)
The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122
J. Ristic, Alissa Wright, A. Kingstone (2006)
The number line effect reflects top-down controlPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13
W. Gevers, B. Reynvoet, W. Fias (2003)
The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organizedCognition, 87
A. Tuckett (2010)
It Depends on How You Look at It.Adults Learning, 21
(2006)
Visual attention and the 627 semantics of space : Beyond central and peripheral cues
(2001)
Number processing induces spatial perfor - 610 mance biases
A. Idrissi, Jean-François Prunet (2008)
On the Mental Representation of
M. Casarotti, Marika Michielin, M. Zorzi, C. Umilta (2007)
Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attentionCognition, 102
E. Hubbard, M. Piazza, P. Pinel, S. Dehaene (2005)
Interactions between number and space in parietal cortexNature Reviews Neuroscience, 6
J. Pratt, B. Hommel (2003)
Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 29 5
M. Zorzi, K. Priftis, F. Meneghello, Roberto Marenzi, C. Umilta (2006)
The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglectNeuropsychologia, 44
(2006)
The number line effect
(2001)
Symbolic 630 control of visual attention
G. Galfano, E. Rusconi, C. Umilta (2006)
Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s willPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13
M. Fischer, Julia Roitmann (2005)
Do Negative Numbers Have a Place on the Mental Number LinePsychology Science, 47
M. Fischer, A. Castel, Michael Dodd, J. Pratt (2003)
Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attentionNature Neuroscience, 6
(2004)
The mental represen - 624 tation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized . Evidence from 625 days of the week
Vincent Walsh (2003)
A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantityTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 7
(2009)
Training attention: Interactions
J. Ristic, C. Friesen, A. Kingstone (2002)
Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at itPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9
(2009)
Beyond the 587 number domain
Three experiments are reported examining whether the presentation of irrelevant negative numbers at central fixation interacts with attentional orienting beyond fixation. It has been previously shown that number perception influences spatial attention, with the presentation of spatially nonpredictive numbers resulting in the allocation of attention to the left when the number is low (e.g., 1 or 2) and to the right when the number is high (e.g., 8 or 9). In the present experiment, it is examined whether this attentional spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect is influenced by the presentation of negative numbers, which should have spatial properties that are in direct opposition to their positive counterparts (e.g., −1 or −2 would be considered high numbers relative to −8 or −9, which would be considered low numbers). Though the presentation of negative numbers does not lead to a reversal of the attentional SNARC effect, it does lead to an elimination of the effect, providing insight into how the attentional SNARC effect develops.
Psychological Research – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 10, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.