Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jacob Cohen, P. Cohen, S. West, L. Aiken (1979)
Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
TJ HASTIE, JH FRIEDMAN, RJ TIBSHIRANI (2009)
Elements of Statistical Learning
(2013)
mda: Mixture and Flexible Discriminant Analysis, R package version 0.4-4,S original by Hastie and Tishirani, original R port by Leisch, Hornik, and Ripley, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mda
(2016)
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
S. Menard (2000)
Coefficients of Determination for Multiple Logistic Regression AnalysisThe American Statistician, 54
J. Quinlan (1992)
C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning
Bradley Boehmke, Brandon Greenwell (2019)
Multivariate Adaptive Regression SplinesHands-On Machine Learning with R
Alexandros Karatzoglou, David Meyer, K. Hornik (2006)
Support Vector Machines in RJournal of Statistical Software, 15
S. Assmann, D. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow, K. Mundt (1996)
Confidence Intervals for Measures of InteractionEpidemiology, 7
T FLEMING, D HARRINGTON (1991)
Counting Processes and Survival Analysis
Hyunjoong Kim, Wei-Yin Loh (2001)
Classification Trees With Unbiased Multiway SplitsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 96
(1990)
Generalized AdditiveModels
(2014)
C50: C5.0 Decision Trees and Rule-Based Models”, R package version 0.1.0-19, (C code for C5.0 by R. Quinlan), http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=C50
(2014)
TH.Data: TH's Data Archive
D. McFadden (1974)
MEASUREMENT OF URBAN TRAVEL DEMANDJournal of Public Economics, 3
JH FRIEDMAN, T HASTIE, R TIBSHIRANI (2000)
Additive Logistic Regression: A Statistical View of BoostingThe Annals of Statistics, 28
(2002)
2002)Modern Applied Statistics with S, New York: Springer
(2010)
mlbench: Machine Learning Benchmark Problems”, R package version 2.1-1, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mlbench
D. Ruppert (2004)
The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and PredictionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 99
M. Wade (1999)
Construction and Assessment of Classification RulesTechnometrics, 41
J. Morgan, J. Sonquist (1963)
Problems in the Analysis of Survey Data, and a ProposalJournal of the American Statistical Association, 58
H. Chipman, E. George, R. McCulloch (2008)
BART: Bayesian Additive Regression TreesThe Annals of Applied Statistics, 4
For a list of recent papers see the backpages of this paper. evtree: Evolutionary Learning of Globally Optimal Classification and Regression Trees in R
A. Zeileis, T. Hothorn, K. Hornik (2008)
Model-Based Recursive PartitioningJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17
A. Kapelner, J. Bleich (2013)
bartMachine: A Powerful Tool for Machine LearningArXiv, abs/1312.2171
Amy Gonz'alez, D. Cox (2007)
Interpretation of interaction: A reviewThe Annals of Applied Statistics, 1
Alexandros Karatzoglou, A. Smola, K. Hornik, A. Zeileis (2004)
kernlab - An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in RJournal of Statistical Software, 11
L. George (2003)
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time DataTechnometrics, 45
(1996)
Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, New York NY
Wei-Yin Loh (2010)
Improving the precision of classification treesarXiv: Applications
Mark Culp, Kjell Johnson, G. Michailides (2006)
ada: An R Package for Stochastic BoostingJournal of Statistical Software, 17
(1991)
Counting Processes and Survival Analysis, Hoboken NJ
A. Asuncion (2007)
UCI Machine Learning Repository, University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences
J. Demšar (2006)
Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data SetsJ. Mach. Learn. Res., 7
L BREIMAN, J FRIEDMAN, R OLSHEN, C STONE (1984)
Classification and Regression Trees
L. Breiman, R. Olshen (2017)
Points of Significance: Classification and regression treesNature Methods, 14
T. Rusch, Ilro Lee, K. Hornik, Wolfgang Jank, A. Zeileis (2012)
Influencing Elections with Statistics: Targeting Voters with Logistic Regression TreesPolitical Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal
T RUSCH, I LEE, K HORNIK, W JANK, A ZEILEIS (2013)
Influencing Elections with Statistics: Targeting Voters with Logistic Regression TreesThe Annals of Applied Statistics, 7
J. Dawson (2014)
Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and HowJournal of Business and Psychology, 29
(2009)
ipred : Improved Predictors
Wei-Yin Loh, Yu-Shan Shih (1997)
SPLIT SELECTION METHODS FOR CLASSIFICATION TREES
H. Balli, Bent Sørensen (2010)
Interaction effects in econometricsEmpirical Economics, 45
อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์ (2014)
Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and TechniquesJournal of management science, 3
P MCCULLAGH, JA NELDER (1989)
Generalized Linear Models
D. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow (1991)
Applied Logistic Regression
L. Breiman (2001)
Random ForestsMachine Learning, 45
Jonathan Nagler (1994)
Scobit: An Alternative Estimator to Logit and ProbitAmerican Journal of Political Science, 38
Jeff Allen, Huy Le (2008)
An Additional Measure of Overall Effect Size for Logistic Regression ModelsJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33
E. Dusseldorp, C. Conversano, Bart Os (2010)
Combining an Additive and Tree-Based Regression Model Simultaneously: STIMAJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 19
L. Breiman (2004)
Bagging predictorsMachine Learning, 24
T. Hothorn, K. Hornik, A. Zeileis (2006)
Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference FrameworkJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15
Niels Landwehr, M. Hall, E. Frank (2003)
Logistic Model TreesMachine Learning, 59
Andy Liaw, M. Wiener (2007)
Classification and Regression by randomForest
J. Friedman (2000)
Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boostingAnnals of Statistics, 28
WN VENABLES, BD RIPLEY (2002)
Modern Applied Statistics with S
We introduce a model dealing with the identification of interaction effects in binary response data, which integrates recursive partitioning and generalized linear models. It derives from an ad-hoc specification and consequent implementation of the Simultaneous Threshold Interaction Modeling Algorithm (STIMA). The model, called Logistic Classification Trunk, allows us to obtain regression parameters by maximum likelihood through the simultaneous estimation of both main effects and threshold interaction effects. The main feature of this model is that it allows the user to evaluate a unique model and simultaneously the importance of both effects obtained by first growing a classification trunk and then by pruning it back to avoid overfitting. We investigate the choice of a suitable pruning parameter through a simulation study and compare the classification accuracy of the Logistic Classification Trunk with that of 13 alternative models/classifiers on 25 binary response datasets.
Journal of Classification – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 6, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.