Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Modeling the dynamics of the retentivity process of journals among the most authoritative scientific serials

Modeling the dynamics of the retentivity process of journals among the most authoritative... The article examines the process of journal retention over time as the most authoritative sources of scientific papers. Formal concepts of retentivity are introduced, retentivity orders and retentivity directions. The postulates, which are formulated in the article, link the probability of retention to the time interval between the two compared journal lists, to the ratio of the sizes of these lists, as well as to some qualitative characteristics of the journals. A mathematical model of the retentivity process is built on the basis of these postulates. The model is compared with data from the Journal Citation Reports—Science Edition for a 16-year period. The results of this comparison show a high degree of conformity of the model to the real process of retentivity, and reveal important features of this process. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics Springer Journals

Modeling the dynamics of the retentivity process of journals among the most authoritative scientific serials

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/modeling-the-dynamics-of-the-retentivity-process-of-journals-among-the-bU6srlXWul

References (10)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Allerton Press, Inc.
Subject
Computer Science; Information Storage and Retrieval
ISSN
0005-1055
eISSN
1934-8371
DOI
10.3103/S0005105513030011
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The article examines the process of journal retention over time as the most authoritative sources of scientific papers. Formal concepts of retentivity are introduced, retentivity orders and retentivity directions. The postulates, which are formulated in the article, link the probability of retention to the time interval between the two compared journal lists, to the ratio of the sizes of these lists, as well as to some qualitative characteristics of the journals. A mathematical model of the retentivity process is built on the basis of these postulates. The model is compared with data from the Journal Citation Reports—Science Edition for a 16-year period. The results of this comparison show a high degree of conformity of the model to the real process of retentivity, and reveal important features of this process.

Journal

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical LinguisticsSpringer Journals

Published: Aug 6, 2013

There are no references for this article.