Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/mathematical-progress-in-expressive-image-synthesis-iii-revisiting-0pVcDN0Zag
References (6)
-
(2013)
Real-time vorticity-based fire and smoke simulation using marching tetrahedra -
J. Christiansen (1997)
Numerical Simulation of Hydrodynamics by the Method of Point VorticesJournal of Computational Physics, 135
-
L. Yaeger, C. Upson, R. Myers (1986)
Combining physical and visual simulation—creation of the planet Jupiter for the film “2010”Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
-
Xinxin Zhang, R. Bridson (2014)
A PPPM fast summation method for fluids and beyondACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 33
-
Tyson Brochu, T. Keeler, R. Bridson (2012)
Linear-time smoke animation with vortex sheet meshes -
Xinxin Zhang, R. Bridson, C. Greif (2015)
Restoring the missing vorticity in advection-projection fluid solversACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 34
- Publisher
- Springer Singapore
- Copyright
- © Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016
- ISBN
- 978-981-10-1075-0
- Pages
- 41 –44
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-981-10-1076-7_5
- Publisher site
- See Chapter on Publisher Site
Abstract
[Although some of the earliest work in fluid simulationFluid simulation for computer graphics exploited vorticity (e.g. Yaeger et al.’s work on Jupiter for the film 2010 [4]), by and large practical work over the last decade or two has focused on velocity-pressure formulations. This talk looks at why vortex methods are worth coming back to, the troubles that have steered practitioners away from them, and how we might overcome them.]
Published: May 22, 2016
Keywords: Fluid simulation; Physics-based animation; Vortex methods