Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Kohli, Ellen Hoadley (1997)
Business process re‐engineering concepts and tools effectiveness: a survey of practitionersKnowledge and Process Management, 4
D. Tsichritzis (1999)
Reengineering the universityCommunications of the ACM, 42
David Stanley, John Meyer, Laryssa Topolnytsky (2005)
Employee Cynicism and Resistance to Organizational ChangeJournal of Business and Psychology, 19
L. Roberts (1994)
Process Reengineering: The Key to Achieving Breakthrough Success
Jaejung Lee (1995)
An exploratory study of organizational/managerial factors influencing business process reengineering implementation: An empirical study of critical success factors and resistance management
P. Drucker (1992)
Managing for the Future
T. Davenport (1992)
Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology
J. Peppard, Danielle Fitzgerald (1997)
The transfer of culturally-grounded management techniques: The case of business reengineering in GermanyEuropean Management Journal, 15
M. Al-Mashari, M. Zairi (2000)
Revisiting BPR: a holistic review of practice and developmentBus. Process. Manag. J., 6
M. Ayanda (2008)
Impact Assessment of Business Process Reengineering on Organisational Performance
Noeleen Doherty, Jim Horsted (1996)
Re-engineering people—The forgotten survivorsBusiness Change and Re-engineering, 3
M. Hammer, J. Champy (1995)
REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION
K. Larsen, K. Krumov, H. Le, Reidar Ommundsen, C. Veer (2009)
Threat Perception and Attitudes Toward Documented and Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: Framing the Debate and Conflict ResolutionEuropean journal of social sciences, 7
A. Braganza, A. Myers (1996)
Issues and Dilemmas Facing Organizations in the Effective Implementation of BPRBusiness Change and Re-engineering, 3
M. Al-Mashari, M. Zairi (1999)
BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factorsBus. Process. Manag. J., 5
R. Andreu, J. Ricart, J. Valor (1997)
Process Innovation: Changing Boxes or Revolutionizing Organizations?Knowledge and Process Management, 4
(1999)
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
Pamela Lewis, S. Goodman, Patricia Fandt (1995)
Management: Challenges in the 21st Century
Barbara Bashein, M. Markus, Patricia Riley (1994)
PRECONDITIONS FOR BPR SUCCESS And How to Prevent FailuresInformation Systems Management, 11
E. Deakins, Hugh Makgill (1996)
What killed BPR?: some evidence from the literatureProceedings of 1996 Information Systems Conference of New Zealand
A. Ascari, M. Rock, S. Dutta (1995)
Reengineering and organizational change: Lessons from a comparative analysis of company experiencesEuropean Management Journal, 13
M. Terziovski, P. Fitzpatrick, P. O'Neill (2003)
Successful predictors of business process reengineering (BPR) in financial servicesInternational Journal of Production Economics, 84
[This research evaluates the factors that influence the implementation and consequences of business process re-engineering (BPR)Business process re-engineering (BPR). The study is based on a case of a university in Ethiopia. Using various individual and organizational change management theories, our study’s findings can have implications for forming policy. The study used primary and secondary data sources, capturing both quantitative information and qualitative information. Our findings suggest that the management systemManagement system at the university was non-participatory and inadequate attention was paid to employees’ concerns in implementing BPR. In addition, lack of transparency in forming BPRBusiness process re-engineering (BPR) teams, a discriminatory organizational cultureOrganizational culture, poor management commitments, centralization of resources, massive expansion, and external pressures overshadowed BPR’s implementation. As a practical implication of our study, we suggest that top managers and BPR team members need to commence their BPRBusiness process re-engineering (BPR) planning process by listening to the voices of the ‘customers’ (students, academics, and administrative staff), celebrating academic freedom and adopting mutual consent on change matters, and creating a conducive environment that nurtures trust, ignites initiation, and contributes to personal development. ]
Published: May 20, 2017
Keywords: BPR; Management system; Resistance; Organizational culture; ICT; Education; Training
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.