Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

ISPs & Rowdy Web Sites Before the Law: Should We Change Today’s Safe Harbour Clauses?

ISPs & Rowdy Web Sites Before the Law: Should We Change Today’s Safe Harbour Clauses? The paper examines today’s debate on the new responsibilities of Internet service providers (ISPs) in connection with legal problems concerning jurisdiction, data processing, people’s privacy and education. The focus is foremost on the default rules and safe harbour clauses for ISPs liability, set up by the US and European legal systems. This framework is deepened in light of the different functions of the services provided on the Internet so as to highlight multiple levels of control over information and, correspondingly, different types of liability. The new responsibilities of ISPs concern the original “end-to-end” architecture of the medium and policies on design rather than responsibility for user content and individual messages. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophy & Technology Springer Journals

ISPs & Rowdy Web Sites Before the Law: Should We Change Today’s Safe Harbour Clauses?

Philosophy & Technology , Volume 24 (4) – May 20, 2011

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/isps-rowdy-web-sites-before-the-law-should-we-change-today-s-safe-AxvVtkAzVR
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Philosophy; Philosophy of Technology
ISSN
2210-5433
eISSN
2210-5441
DOI
10.1007/s13347-011-0031-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The paper examines today’s debate on the new responsibilities of Internet service providers (ISPs) in connection with legal problems concerning jurisdiction, data processing, people’s privacy and education. The focus is foremost on the default rules and safe harbour clauses for ISPs liability, set up by the US and European legal systems. This framework is deepened in light of the different functions of the services provided on the Internet so as to highlight multiple levels of control over information and, correspondingly, different types of liability. The new responsibilities of ISPs concern the original “end-to-end” architecture of the medium and policies on design rather than responsibility for user content and individual messages.

Journal

Philosophy & TechnologySpringer Journals

Published: May 20, 2011

References