Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Is there only CO2 insufflation pressure impact on surgical field visualization during robotic surgery?

Is there only CO2 insufflation pressure impact on surgical field visualization during robotic... Arch Gynecol Obstet (2015) 292:1177–1178 DOI 10.1007/s00404-015-3876-x LETTER TO THE EDITOR Is there only CO insufflation pressure impact on surgical field visualization during robotic surgery? 1,2 3 4 5 • • • • Ospan A. Mynbaev Andrea Tinelli Antonio Malvasi Oktay Kadayifci 6 7 Tahar Benhidjeb Michael Stark Received: 23 March 2015 / Accepted: 26 August 2015 / Published online: 3 September 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Dear Editor, was able to evaluate optimally the area considered, whereas 0 means no visualization. The novel European telesurgical system with force feed- The findings of this study are logical, it means that in back is a project supported by the New European Surgical conventional laparoscopy the surgical field visualization Academy (NESA). Therefore, we the members of the was dependent linear on the insufflation pressure rate: the academy have read with great interest the article by best vision was registered at 15 mmHg in comparison with Angioli et al. [1], recently published in your journal. The lower degrees of pressure (10 and 5 mmHg), subsequently authors have evaluated surgical field modifications related better vision was achieved at 10 mmHg in comparison with to CO pressure, during laparoscopic and robotic surgery the lowest http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Springer Journals

Is there only CO2 insufflation pressure impact on surgical field visualization during robotic surgery?

Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/is-there-only-co-2-insufflation-pressure-impact-on-surgical-field-cOf4CwvZSM

References (14)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Gynecology; Obstetrics/Perinatology; Endocrinology; Human Genetics
ISSN
0932-0067
eISSN
1432-0711
DOI
10.1007/s00404-015-3876-x
pmid
26335187
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Arch Gynecol Obstet (2015) 292:1177–1178 DOI 10.1007/s00404-015-3876-x LETTER TO THE EDITOR Is there only CO insufflation pressure impact on surgical field visualization during robotic surgery? 1,2 3 4 5 • • • • Ospan A. Mynbaev Andrea Tinelli Antonio Malvasi Oktay Kadayifci 6 7 Tahar Benhidjeb Michael Stark Received: 23 March 2015 / Accepted: 26 August 2015 / Published online: 3 September 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Dear Editor, was able to evaluate optimally the area considered, whereas 0 means no visualization. The novel European telesurgical system with force feed- The findings of this study are logical, it means that in back is a project supported by the New European Surgical conventional laparoscopy the surgical field visualization Academy (NESA). Therefore, we the members of the was dependent linear on the insufflation pressure rate: the academy have read with great interest the article by best vision was registered at 15 mmHg in comparison with Angioli et al. [1], recently published in your journal. The lower degrees of pressure (10 and 5 mmHg), subsequently authors have evaluated surgical field modifications related better vision was achieved at 10 mmHg in comparison with to CO pressure, during laparoscopic and robotic surgery the lowest

Journal

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics – Springer Journals

Published: Sep 3, 2015

There are no references for this article.