Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2008)
The sage handbook of personality theory and assessment: personality measurement and testing
D. Organ, K. Ryan (1995)
A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF ATTITUDINAL AND DISPOSITIONAL PREDICTORS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORPersonnel Psychology, 48
J. Bachman, P. O'Malley (1984)
Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response StylesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 48
I graduated high school at age eight
D. Berry, M. Wetter, R. Baer, Lene Larsen, C. Clark, K. Monroe (1992)
MMPI-2 Random Responding Indices: Validation Using a Self-Report Methodology.Psychological Assessment, 4
Jason Huang, P. Curran, Jessica Keeney, Elizabeth Poposki, R. DeShon (2012)
Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to SurveysJournal of Business and Psychology, 27
Amanda Baraldi, Craig Enders (2010)
An introduction to modern missing data analyses.Journal of school psychology, 48 1
(2006)
Oversurveying: Causes, consequences, and cures. Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, methods, and applications
Michael Maniaci, Ronald Rogge (2014)
Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research.Journal of Research in Personality, 48
F. Anseel, F. Lievens, Eveline Schollaert, B. Chorągwicka (2010)
Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995–2008: A Meta-analytic Review and Guidelines for Survey ResearchersJournal of Business and Psychology, 25
MR Barrick, TR Mitchell, GL Stewart (2003)
Personality and work: reconsidering the role of personality in organizations
Mark Skowronski (2012)
When the bored behave badly (or exceptionally)Personnel Review, 41
LR Goldberg (1999)
Personality psychology in Europe
N. Bowling, Jason Huang, Caleb Bragg, Steven Khazon, Mengqiao Liu, Caitlin Blackmore (2016)
Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality.Journal of personality and social psychology, 111 2
R. Farmer, N. Sundberg (1986)
Boredom proneness--the development and correlates of a new scale.Journal of personality assessment, 50 1
S. Rogelberg, J. Stanton (2007)
Introduction Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey NonresponseOrganizational Research Methods, 10
John Johnson (2005)
Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories.Journal of Research in Personality, 39
R. Little, Linda Yau (1998)
Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Data from Prevention Trials: Treatment of No-Shows Using Rubin's Causal ModelPsychological Methods, 3
Murray Barrick, M. Mount (1991)
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 44
P. Costa, R. McCrae (2008)
The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R)
A. Meade, S. Craig (2012)
Identifying careless responses in survey data.Psychological methods, 17 3
L. Goldberg (1999)
A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models, 7
J. Bardo, S. Yeager, M. Klingsporn (1982)
Preliminary Assessment of Format-Specific Central Tendency and Leniency Error in Summated Rating ScalesPerceptual and Motor Skills, 54
J. DeSimone, P. Harms, Alice DeSimone (2015)
Best practice recommendations for data screeningJournal of Organizational Behavior, 36
J. Krosnick (1991)
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveysApplied Cognitive Psychology, 5
S. Eberhart (2016)
Applied Missing Data Analysis
L. Christian, D. Dillman, Jolene Smyth (2007)
The Effects of Mode and Format on Answers to Scalar Questions in Telephone and Web Surveys
Natalie Allen, John Meyer (1990)
The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organizationJournal of occupational psychology, 63
I am ninety-nine years old
Stephanie Merritt (2012)
The Two-Factor Solution to Allen and Meyer’s (1990) Affective Commitment Scale: Effects of Negatively Worded ItemsJournal of Business and Psychology, 27
J. Watt, M. Hargis (2010)
Boredom Proneness: Its Relationship with Subjective Underemployment, Perceived Organizational Support, and Job PerformanceJournal of Business and Psychology, 25
Russell Guay, In-Sue Oh, Daejeong Choi, Marie Mitchell, M. Mount, Kanghyun Shin (2013)
The Interactive Effect of Conscientiousness and Agreeableness on Job Performance Dimensions in South KoreaO&M: Decision-Making in Organizations eJournal
Murray Barrick, T. Mitchell, G. Stewart (2016)
CHAPTER 3 Situational and Motivational Influences on Trait-Behavior Relationships
RP Guay, IS Oh, D Choi, MS Mitchell, MK Mount, K Shin (2013)
The interactive effect of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance dimensions in South KoreaInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21
Carol Woods (2006)
Careless Responding to Reverse-Worded Items: Implications for Confirmatory Factor AnalysisJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28
David Nichols, Roger Greene, Peter Schmolck (1989)
Criteria for assessing inconsistent patterns of item endorsement on the MMPI: rationale, development, and empirical trials.Journal of clinical psychology, 45 2
R. Greene (1978)
An empirically derived MMPI Carelessness Scale.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34
Alyssa McGonagle, Jason Huang, Benjamin Walsh (2016)
Insufficient Effort Survey Responding: An Under‐Appreciated Problem in Work and Organisational Health Psychology ResearchApplied Psychology, 65
Surveys are one of the most popular ways to collect employee information. Because of their widespread use, data quality is an increasingly important concern. The purpose of this paper is to (1) introduce the intra-individual response variability (IRV) index as an easily calculated and flexible way to detect insufficient effort responding (IER); (2) examine the extent to which various IER indices detect the same or different respondents engaging in IER behavior; and (3) investigate relationships between individual differences and commonly used IER indices to better understand systematic and theoretically relevant IER behavior. In a two-part study, 199 undergraduates responded to questionnaires online, and various IER indices were calculated. The IRV index identifies different respondents than other IER indices. Values on the IRV index (as well as other IER indices) are related to scores on theoretically meaningful individual differences in conscientiousness, agreeableness, and boredom proneness. This study provides researchers with a robust, easily calculated, and flexible means for screening questionnaire data for IER behavior. Practical recommendations for finding and making decisions about IER behavior patterns are provided. This study introduces the IRV index, an extension of the long string, used to identify survey research participants who likely engaged in one type of IER behavior. It is also one of the first studies to evaluate the extent to which IER indices identify different respondents as having engaged in IER and provides additional evidence that values on these indices are related to individual differences.
Journal of Business and Psychology – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 22, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.