Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M., Alex, Meredith, Barry, E., Stein (1986)
Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration.Journal of neurophysiology, 56 3
K. Vu, R. Proctor (2006)
Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application
F. Colavita (1974)
Human sensory dominancePerception & Psychophysics, 16
R Nicoletti, C Umiltà, EP Tressoldi, CA Marzi (1988)
Why are right–left spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?Perception and Psychophysics, 43
F. Lee, A. Chan (2007)
Attending visual and auditory signals : Ergonomics recommendations with consideration of signal modality and spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibilityInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37
Ken Chan, A. Chan (2005)
Spatial S-R compatibility of visual and auditory signals: implications for human-machine interface designDisplays, 26
Kim-Phuong Vu, Robert Proctor (2001)
Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 27 4
G. Heister, W. Ehrenstein, P. Schroeder-Heister (1986)
Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positionsPerception & Psychophysics, 40
B. Hommel (1996)
No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codesPerception & Psychophysics, 58
B Scharf (1998)
Attention
Akio Nishimura, K. Yokosawa (2009)
Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: The Simon effect and the SMARC effectPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16
K-PL Vu, RW Proctor, DF Pick (2000)
Horizontal versus vertical compatibility: right–left prevalence with bimanual responsesPsychological Research, 64
E. Rusconi, Bonnie Kwan, Bruno Giordano, C. Umilta, B. Butterworth (2006)
Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effectCognition, 99
Pascale Lidji, Régine Kolinsky, Aliette Lochy, J. Morais (2007)
Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head?Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 33 5
(2006)
An introduction to auditory warnings and alarms
D. Perrott, K. Saberi (1990)
Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87 4
S. Sinnett, C. Spence, S. Soto-Faraco (2007)
Visual dominance and attention: The Colavita effect revisitedPerception & Psychophysics, 69
R. Nicoletti, C. Umilta, Emanuele Tressoldi, C. Marzi (1988)
Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?Perception & Psychophysics, 43
R. Welch, D. Warren (1980)
Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy.Psychological bulletin, 88 3
R. Nicoletti, C. Umilta (1984)
Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibilityPerception & Psychophysics, 35
R. Nicoletti, C. Umilta (1985)
Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still presentPerception & Psychophysics, 38
Martin Eimer, Erich Schröger (1998)
ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention.Psychophysiology, 35 3
Valerio Santangelo, Cristy Ho, C. Spence (2008)
Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cuesPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15
K. Vu, R. Proctor (2002)
The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensionsPerception & Psychophysics, 64
B. Scharf (1998)
Auditory attention: the psychoacoustical approach
M. Wogalter (2006)
Handbook of Warnings
K. Vu, R. Proctor, David Pick (2000)
Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: Right-left prevalence with bimanual responsesPsychological Research, 64
P. Keller, I. Koch (2006)
Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuliAdvances in Cognitive Psychology, 2
S. Rubichi, K. Vu, R. Nicoletti, R. Proctor (2006)
Spatial coding in two dimensionsPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13
M. Ngo, S. Sinnett, S. Soto-Faraco, C. Spence (2010)
Repetition blindness and the Colavita effectNeuroscience Letters, 480
When auditory stimuli are used in two-dimensional spatial compatibility tasks, where the stimulus and response configurations vary along the horizontal and vertical dimensions simultaneously, a right–left prevalence effect occurs in which horizontal compatibility dominates over vertical compatibility. The right–left prevalence effects obtained with auditory stimuli are typically larger than that obtained with visual stimuli even though less attention should be demanded from the horizontal dimension in auditory processing. In the present study, we examined whether auditory or visual dominance occurs when the two-dimensional stimuli are audiovisual, as well as whether there will be cross-modal facilitation of response selection for the horizontal and vertical dimensions. We also examined whether there is an additional benefit of adding a pitch dimension to the auditory stimulus to facilitate vertical coding through use of the spatial-musical association of response codes (SMARC) effect, where pitch is coded in terms of height in space. In Experiment 1, we found a larger right–left prevalence effect for unimodal auditory than visual stimuli. Neutral, non-pitch coded, audiovisual stimuli did not result in cross-modal facilitation, but did show evidence of visual dominance. The right–left prevalence effect was eliminated in the presence of SMARC audiovisual stimuli, but the effect influenced horizontal rather than vertical coding. Experiment 2 showed that the influence of the pitch dimension was not in terms of influencing response selection on a trial-to-trial basis, but in terms of altering the salience of the task environment. Taken together, these findings indicate that in the absence of salient vertical cues, auditory and audiovisual stimuli tend to be coded along the horizontal dimension and vision tends to dominate audition in this two-dimensional spatial stimulus–response task.
Psychological Research – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 6, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.