Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Sarbjeet, T. Datta (1998)
Open-Closed Loop Linear Control of Building Frames under Seismic ExcitationJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 124
C. Yang, H. Saunders (1986)
Random vibration of structures
M. Singh, E. Matheu, L. Suárez (1997)
ACTIVE AND SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL OF STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC EXCITATIONEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 26
B. Sp, S. Nag (2003)
State of the Art of Structural Control
Chunxiang Li, Yanxia Liu (2002)
Active multiple tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground accelerationEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31
Chunwei Zhang, J. Ou (2008)
Control Structure Interaction of Electromagnetic Mass Damper System for Structural Vibration ControlJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 134
You‐lin Xu (2002)
Recent developments in structural controlEngineering Structures, 24
(1994)
Sliding mode control for structures subjected to seismic loading
G. Song, Jiahao Lin, F. Williams, Zhigang Wu (2006)
Precise integration strategy for aseismic LQG control of structuresInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 68
Ebrahim Nazarimofrad, S. Zahrai (2016)
Seismic control of irregular multistory buildings using active tendons considering soil–structure interaction effectSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 89
Chunxiang Li, Yanxia Liu, Z. Wang (2003)
Active Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers: A New Control StrategyJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 129
Z. Ying, Y. Ni, J. Ko (2003)
Stochastic optimal coupling-control of adjacent building structuresComputers & Structures, 81
J. Chase, Scott Breneman, H. Smith (1999)
Robust H∞ Static Output Feedback Control with Actuator SaturationJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 125
L. Hanagan, E. Kulasekere, K. Walgama, K. Premaratne (2000)
Optimal Placement of Actuators and Sensors for Floor Vibration ControlJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 126
(1993)
Dynamics of structures (2nd ed.). Singapore: McGrow
J. Chang, T. Soong (1980)
STRUCTURAL CONTROL USING ACTIVE TUNED MASS DAMPERSJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 106
Chien‐Liang Lee, Yen-Po Wang (2004)
Seismic structural control using an electric servomotor active mass driver systemEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33
Y. Ikeda, Katsuyasu Sasaki, M. Sakamoto, T. Kobori (2001)
Active mass driver system as the first application of active structural controlEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30
G. Housner, L. Bergman, T. Caughey, A. Chassiakos, R. Claus, S. Masri, R. Skelton, T. Soong, B. Spencer, J. Yao (1997)
STRUCTURAL CONTROL: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTUREJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 123
R. Fox, C. Mote (1971)
Optimization methods for engineering design
R. Guclu, Hakan Yazici (2008)
Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllersJournal of Sound and Vibration, 318
B. Spencer, Satish Nagarajaiah (2003)
STATE OF THE ART OF STRUCTURAL CONTROLJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 129
Masashi Yamamoto, S. Aizawa, M. Higashino, Kotaro Toyama (2001)
Practical applications of active mass dampers with hydraulic actuatorEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30
L. Meirovitch (1990)
Dynamics And Control Of Structures
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
T. Soong (1988)
State-of-the-art review. Active structural control in civil engineeringScopus
Active control schemes are quite promising because of their capability of achieving high level of control of structural response under seismic excitations. Level of control is a function of many parameters associated with structure, excitation and the scheme of control considered. Optimal level of control may be achieved by optimization of control parameters. Basically, elements of weighing matrix primarily govern the relationship of control force and the level of response reduction. But which parameters are predominant in governing this relationship is the matter of investigation. Weighing element associated with velocity of actuated tuned mass damper has been chosen by some researchers as an important parameter in case where force actuation was done through an active mass driver system. But other elements of weighing matrix need to be investigated with a possibility of being predominant in controlling the response. An extensive parametric study is needed to arrive at the best combination of parameters that may lead to the optimal structural control. Keeping in view the same, an effort is made here by trying various combinations of the different elements corresponding to displacement and velocity terms of the state vector to obtain the optimum level of control of structural response with a least possible level of control force.
"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering" – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 1, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.