Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

How to Live a Life of One’s Own: Heidegger, Marcuse and Jonas on Technology and Alienation

How to Live a Life of One’s Own: Heidegger, Marcuse and Jonas on Technology and Alienation In this paper, I explore Martin Heidegger’s and Herbert Marcuse’s critiques of technology, and their suggestions on how to neutralise the negative effects of technology, in order to articulate a potential path to an authentic, unalienated life. Martin Heidegger’s view of technology and its negative effects are first explored before presenting Marcuse’s critique of Heidegger. The dissimilarities between Heidegger’s ‘Gestell’ and Marcuse’s ‘Technological Rationality’ are then explored, before then examining the differences between Heidegger’s and Marcuse’s ideas of how one may overcome the alienating impact of technology. Favouring Marcuse’s suggestions, Hans Jonas’ work on technological ethics is then posited as a necessary guide for Marcuse’s vision of a post-alienated existence. I conclude that the continued appropriation and integration of Heideggerian thought into critiques of technology could be valuable for the field, especially when answering questions concerning individual authenticity in the context of rapid technological progress and ecological decline. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophy & Technology Springer Journals

How to Live a Life of One’s Own: Heidegger, Marcuse and Jonas on Technology and Alienation

Philosophy & Technology , Volume 34 (3) – Sep 1, 2021

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/how-to-live-a-life-of-one-s-own-heidegger-marcuse-and-jonas-on-91oPrG45gV
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © Springer Nature B.V. 2020
ISSN
2210-5433
eISSN
2210-5441
DOI
10.1007/s13347-020-00417-4
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this paper, I explore Martin Heidegger’s and Herbert Marcuse’s critiques of technology, and their suggestions on how to neutralise the negative effects of technology, in order to articulate a potential path to an authentic, unalienated life. Martin Heidegger’s view of technology and its negative effects are first explored before presenting Marcuse’s critique of Heidegger. The dissimilarities between Heidegger’s ‘Gestell’ and Marcuse’s ‘Technological Rationality’ are then explored, before then examining the differences between Heidegger’s and Marcuse’s ideas of how one may overcome the alienating impact of technology. Favouring Marcuse’s suggestions, Hans Jonas’ work on technological ethics is then posited as a necessary guide for Marcuse’s vision of a post-alienated existence. I conclude that the continued appropriation and integration of Heideggerian thought into critiques of technology could be valuable for the field, especially when answering questions concerning individual authenticity in the context of rapid technological progress and ecological decline.

Journal

Philosophy & TechnologySpringer Journals

Published: Sep 1, 2021

Keywords: Martin Heidegger; Herbert Marcuse; Hans Jonas; Politics of technology; Authenticity; Alienation

References