Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Henderson, A. Hollingworth (1999)
High-level scene perception.Annual review of psychology, 50
(1996)
Differences in the coding of spatial relations in faces and objects
Margot Taylor, R. Itier, Truett Allison, G. Edmonds (2001)
Direction of gaze effects on early face processing: eyes-only versus full faces.Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 10 3
J. Searcy, J. Bartlett (1996)
Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 22 4
Van Hooff (1967)
The Facial Displays of the Catarrhine Monkeys and Apes.
Malcolm Brown, Z. Bashir (2002)
Evidence concerning how neurons of the perirhinal cortex may effect familiarity discrimination.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 357 1424
N. Emery (2000)
The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gazeNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24
Steven Rosenfeld, G. Hoesen (1979)
Face recognition in the rhesus monkeyNeuropsychologia, 17
F. Nahm, Amelie Perret, D. Amaral, T. Albright (1997)
How Do Monkeys Look at Faces?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9
H. Leder, V. Bruce (1998)
Local and Relational Aspects of Face DistinctivenessQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51
R. Kyes, D. Candland (1987)
Baboon (Papio hamadryas) visual preferences for regions of the face.Journal of comparative psychology, 101 4
W. Redican (1975)
Facial Expressions in Nonhuman Primates
Gerhard Krieger, Ingo Rentschler, Gert Hauske, Kerstin Schill, C. Zetzsche (2000)
Object and scene analysis by saccadic eye-movements: an investigation with higher-order statistics.Spatial vision, 13 2-3
R. Carpenter, M. Williams (1995)
Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movementsNature, 377
M. Young, S. Yamane (1992)
Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex.Science, 256 5061
R. Andrew (1963)
EVOLUTION OF FACIAL EXPRESSION.Science, 142 3595
K. Guo, P. Benson (1998)
Involuntary eye movements in response to first‐ and second‐order motionNeuroReport, 9
A. I︠A︡rbus (1967)
Eye Movements and Vision
B. Zuber, Lawrence Stark, G. Cook (1965)
Microsaccades and the Velocity-Amplitude Relationship for Saccadic Eye MovementsScience, 150
V. Bruce, A. Young (1986)
Understanding face recognition.British journal of psychology, 77 ( Pt 3)
M. Mendelson, M. Haith, P. Goldman-Rakic (1982)
Face scanning and responsiveness to social cues in infant rhesus monkeys.Developmental Psychology, 18
(1975)
Facial expression in nonhuman primates. In: Rosenblum LA (ed) Primate behaviour: developments in field and laboratory research
Y. Sugase, S. Yamane, S. Ueno, K. Kawano (1999)
Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortexNature, 400
James Anderson (1998)
Social stimuli and social rewards in primate learning and cognitionBehavioural Processes, 42
D. Kahan (2000)
In the eye of the beholderNature, 406
K. Swartz (1983)
Species discrimination in infant pigtail macaques with pictorial stimuli.Developmental psychobiology, 16 3
D. Carmel, S. Bentin (2002)
Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of facesCognition, 83
L. Parr, J. Winslow, W. Hopkins (1999)
Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys face-specific?Animal Cognition, 2
(1985)
Infant ’ s perception of facedness
E. Rolls (2000)
Functions of the Primate Temporal Lobe Cortical Visual Areas in Invariant Visual Object and Face RecognitionNeuron, 27
J. Pineda, G. Sebestyen, C. Nava (1994)
Face recognition as a function of social attention in non-human primates: an ERP study.Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 2 1
C. Kleinke (1986)
Gaze and eye contact: a research review.Psychological bulletin, 100 1
D. Noton, L. Stark (1971)
Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns.Vision research, 11 9
T. Valentine (1988)
Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.British journal of psychology, 79 ( Pt 4)
I. Biederman (1987)
Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.Psychological review, 94 2
S. McKelvie (1976)
The Role of Eyes and Mouth in the Memory of a Face.American Journal of Psychology, 89
M. Platt, P. Glimcher (1999)
Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortexNature, 400
I. Biederman, R. Mezzanotte, J. Rabinowitz (1982)
Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violationsCognitive Psychology, 14
B. Rossion, I. Gauthier (2002)
How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews, 1 1
C. Keating, Gregory Keating (1982)
Visual Scan Patterns of Rhesus Monkeys Viewing FacesPerception, 11
P. Marler (1965)
Communication in Monkeys and Apes
A. Jolly (1972)
The Evolution of Primate BehaviorAmerican Scientist
S. Bentin, N. Sagiv, A. Mecklinger, A. Friederici, Yves Cramon (2002)
Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological EvidencePsychological Science, 13
T. Andrews, D. Coppola (1999)
Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environmentsVision Research, 39
F. Attneave (1954)
Some informational aspects of visual perception.Psychological review, 61 3
S. Bentin, L. Deouell (2000)
STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMSCognitive Neuropsychology, 17
M. Eimer (2000)
Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognitionClinical Neurophysiology, 111
L. Parr, J. Winslow, Will Hopkins, F. Waal (2000)
Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Journal of comparative psychology, 114 1
D. Perrett, M. Oram, E. Ashbridge (1998)
Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformationsCognition, 67
S. Bentin, T. Allison, A. Puce, Erik Perez, G. McCarthy (1996)
Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in HumansJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8
C. Bruce (1982)
Face recognition by monkeys: Absence of an inversion effectNeuropsychologia, 20
J. Antes (1974)
The time course of picture viewing.Journal of experimental psychology, 103 1
J. Pineda, C. Nava (1993)
Event-related potentials in macaque monkey during passive and attentional processing of faces in a priming paradigmBehavioural Brain Research, 53
B. Rossion, I. Gauthier, M. Tarr, P. Despland, R. Bruyer, S. Linotte, M. Crommelinck (2000)
The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brainNeuroReport, 11
N. Mackworth, A. Morandi (1967)
The gaze selects informative details within picturesPerception & Psychophysics, 2
Kun Guo Robert G. Robertson +44-191-2228642 +44-191-2225622 r.g.robertson@ncl.ac.uk Sasan Mahmoodi Yoav Tadmor Malcolm P. Young Department of Psychology, School of Biology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Department of Psychology, School of Biology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Face perception plays a crucial role in primate social communication. We have investigated the pattern of eye movements produced by rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta ) as they viewed images of faces. Eye positions were recorded accurately using implanted eye coils, while neutral upright, inverted and scrambled images of monkey and human faces were presented on a computer screen. The monkeys exhibited a similar eye scan pattern while viewing familiar and unfamiliar monkey face images, or while viewing monkey and human face images. No differences were observed in the distribution of viewing times, number of fixations, time into the trial of first saccade to local facial features, and the temporal and spatial characteristics of viewing patterns across the facial images. However, there was a greater probability of re-fixation of the eye region of unfamiliar faces during the first few seconds of the trial suggesting that the eyes are important for the initial encoding of identity. Indeed, the highest fixation density was found in the eye region of all the face images. The viewing duration and the number of fixations per image decreased when inverted or scrambled faces were presented. The eye region in these modified images remained the primary area of fixation. However, the number of fixations directed to the eyes decreased monotonically from the upright images through the inverted versions to the scrambled face images. Nonetheless, the eyes remain the most salient facial substructure regardless of the arrangement of other features, although the extent of salience which they attain may depend both on the low level properties of the eyes and on the global arrangement of facial features.
Experimental Brain Research – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.