Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Hot stuff—can’t get enough

Hot stuff—can’t get enough Osteoporos Int (2006) 17: 791–794 DOI 10.1007/s00198-006-0153-7 HOT STUFF E. Seeman Published online: 5 May 2006 # International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006 From a shadow to its structure No studies have determined whether these sex differ- ences in bone structure actually explain sex differences in The sun projects only Earth’s shadow onto the moon and fracture rates. However, in another paper, Riggs et al. [3] this shadow reveals nothing of Earth’s mountain ranges and explore the sex-specific structural changes in an attempt to rift valleys. In the same way, the projected areal bone define the morphological basis of sex differences in mineral density (aBMD) from the attenuated photons of the fracture rates. The investigators assessed volumetric bone densitometer reveals little of the three-dimensional archi- mineral density (vBMD), cross-sectional geometry, and tecture of bone that is so vital to its strength [1]. axial and flexural rigidities at the ultradistal radius and It is thus a pleasure to see that we are finally moving femoral neck. There is a great deal to learn from this paper away from the ambiguous phenotype of aBMD with the aid and more than I can cover here. vBMD in young adults was http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Osteoporosis International Springer Journals

Hot stuff—can’t get enough

Osteoporosis International , Volume 17 (6) – May 5, 2006

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/hot-stuff-can-t-get-enough-UjjbzWOerg

References (28)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Rheumatology ; Endocrinology ; Gynecology ; Orthopedics
ISSN
0937-941X
eISSN
1433-2965
DOI
10.1007/s00198-006-0153-7
pmid
16715453
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Osteoporos Int (2006) 17: 791–794 DOI 10.1007/s00198-006-0153-7 HOT STUFF E. Seeman Published online: 5 May 2006 # International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006 From a shadow to its structure No studies have determined whether these sex differ- ences in bone structure actually explain sex differences in The sun projects only Earth’s shadow onto the moon and fracture rates. However, in another paper, Riggs et al. [3] this shadow reveals nothing of Earth’s mountain ranges and explore the sex-specific structural changes in an attempt to rift valleys. In the same way, the projected areal bone define the morphological basis of sex differences in mineral density (aBMD) from the attenuated photons of the fracture rates. The investigators assessed volumetric bone densitometer reveals little of the three-dimensional archi- mineral density (vBMD), cross-sectional geometry, and tecture of bone that is so vital to its strength [1]. axial and flexural rigidities at the ultradistal radius and It is thus a pleasure to see that we are finally moving femoral neck. There is a great deal to learn from this paper away from the ambiguous phenotype of aBMD with the aid and more than I can cover here. vBMD in young adults was

Journal

Osteoporosis InternationalSpringer Journals

Published: May 5, 2006

There are no references for this article.