Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Inspired by Foucault’s remark that he “would like [his] books to be a kind of tool-box which others can dig in to find a tool with which they can make good use, in whatever manner they wish, in their own area,” the chapter proceeds to focus on how Foucault himself has applied his method, with special emphasis on his histories of the present, constructed to make contemporary arrangements peculiar—for example, showing that modernity’s will to truth with respect to sexuality (the demand that people give and account of who and what they are as sexual beings) constitutes a radical break with how sexuality had been problematized in early periods. The chapter goes on to treat Foucault’s concern with critique, owed to his persistent affinity with Kantian philosophy in which he breaks with representational thinking and seeks always to explore the conditions of possibility for that which emerges as an object of representation and ends a reflection on Foucault’s ethico-political sensibility.]
Published: Feb 8, 2017
Keywords: Theater Echo; Sovereign Power; Discursive Formation; Legal Justice; Kantian Philosophy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.