Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Miller, L. Crowder, J. Rice, F. Binkowski (1992)
Body Size and the Ontogeny of the Functional Response in FishesCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49
S. Diehl (1988)
Foraging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and lightOikos, 53
E. Werner, D. Hall (1979)
Foraging Efficiency and Habitat Switching in Competiting SunfishesEcology, 60
C. R. Townsend, I. J. Winfield (1985)
Fish Energetics: New Perspectives
T. Uyeno, T. Yoshino, C. Araga, K. Amaoka, H. Masuda (1984)
The fishes of the Japanese archipelago
P. Webb (1984)
Body and Fin Form and Strike Tactics of Four Teleost Predators Attacking Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) PreyCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 41
D. Ware (1973)
Risk of Epibenthic Prey to Predation by Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri)Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly, 30
E. Werner, J. Gilliam, D. Hall, G. Mittelbach (1983)
An Experimental Test of the Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Use in FishEcology, 64
G. Hutchinson (1957)
A treatise on limnology.
P. Chambers (1987)
Light and nutrients in the control of aquatic plant community structure. II: In situ observationsJournal of Ecology, 75
J. Janssen (1982)
Comparison of Searching Behavior for Zooplankton in an Obligate Planktivore, Blueback Herring (Alosa aestivalis) and a Facultative Planktivore, Bluegill (Lepomis machrochirus)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39
C. Holling (1966)
The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey densityMemoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 98
E. Werner, G. Mittelbach, D. Hall, J. Gilliam (1983)
Experimental Tests of Optimal Habitat Use in Fish: The Role of Relative Habitat ProfitabilityEcology, 64
J. J. Videler (1993)
Fish swimming
V. Gotceitas, P. Colgan (1987)
Selection between Densities of Artificial Vegetation by Young Bluegills Avoiding PredationTransactions of The American Fisheries Society, 116
Owen Anderson (1984)
Optimal Foraging by Largemouth Bass in Structured EnvironmentsEcology, 65
M. Dionne, C. Folt (1991)
An Experimental Analysis of Macrophyte Growth Forms as Fish Foraging HabitatCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48
K. Sand‐Jensen, M. Søndergaard (1979)
Distribution and quantitative development of aquatic macrophytes in relation to sediment characteristics in oligotrophic Lake Kalgaard, DenmarkFreshwater Biology, 9
R. Stein (1977)
Selective Predation, Optimal Foraging, and the Predator-Prey Interaction Between Fish and CrayfishEcology, 58
S. Carpenter, J. Kitchell, J. Hodgson, P. Cochran, J. Elser, M. Elser, D. Lodge, D. Kretchmer, Xi He, C. Ende (1987)
Regulation of Lake Primary Productivity by Food Web Structure.Ecology, 68 6
L. B. Crowder, W. E. Cooper (1979)
Response of Fish to Habitat Structure in Standing Water
J. Savino, R. Stein (1982)
Predator-Prey Interaction between Largemouth Bass and Bluegills as Influenced by Simulated, Submersed VegetationTransactions of The American Fisheries Society, 111
E. Werner, D. Hall, D. Laughlin, Donald Wagner, Leni Wilsmann, F. Funk (1977)
Habitat Partitioning in a Freshwater Fish CommunityWsq: Women's Studies Quarterly, 34
(1989)
Food - web manipulation as a tool in waterquality management
S. Vince, I. Valiela, N. Backus, J. Teal (1976)
Predation by the salt marsh killifish Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) in relation to prey size and habitat structure: Consequences for prey distribution and abundanceJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 23
(1901)
Fishes of JapanThe American Naturalist, 35
C. Townsend, I. Winfield (1985)
The Application of Optimal Foraging Theory to Feeding Behaviour in Fish
N. Glass (1971)
5 – Computer Analysis of Predation Energetics in the Largemouth Bass
S. Okuda, T. Shibata, Y. Shimatani, N. Mizuno, M. Yajima, T. Yamagishi (1996)
Prepared for Japanese River Front Planning and Management Center
J. Shapiro (1990)
Biomanipulation: the next phase — making it stableHydrobiologia, 200-201
E. Werner (1974)
The Fish Size, Prey Size, Handling Time Relation in Several Sunfishes and Some ImplicationsWsq: Women's Studies Quarterly, 31
G. Mittelbach (1981)
Patterns of Invertebrate Size and Abundance in Aquatic HabitatsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38
(1996)
Cyclopedia of River Biota. Prepared for Japanese River Front Planning and Management Center
(1979)
Patterns of predation in simple and complex environments
W. E. Cooper, L. E. Crowder (1979)
Predator-Prey Systems in Fisheries Management
J. Confer, P. Blades (1975)
Omnivorous zooplankton and planktivorous fishLimnology and Oceanography, 20
P. Munk, T. Kiørboe (1985)
Feeding behaviour and swimming activity of larval herring (Clupea harengus) in relation to density of copepod nauplii.Marine Ecology Progress Series, 24
G. Vinyard (1980)
Differential Prey Vulnerability and Predator Selectivity: Effects of Evasive Prey on Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and Pumpkinseed (L. gibhosus) PredationCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37
P. Chambers, J. Kalff (1987)
Light and Nutrients in the Control of Aquatic Plant Community Structure. I. In Situ ExperimentsJournal of Ecology, 75
I. Winfield (1986)
The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilisJournal of Fish Biology, 29
J. Savino, R. Stein (1989)
Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetationEnvironmental Biology of Fishes, 24
A. Stoner (1982)
The influence of benthic macrophytes on the foraging behavior of pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides (Linnaeus)☆Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 58
L. Crowder, W. Cooper (1982)
Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their preyEcology, 63
J. Savino, R. Stein (1989)
Behavioural interactions between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant densityAnimal Behaviour, 37
G. E. Hutchinson (1975)
Limnological botany
In the littoral zones of lakes, aquatic macrophytes produce considerable structural variation that can provide protection to prey communities by hindering predator foraging activity. The swimming and feeding behaviour of a planktivore, Pseudorasbora parva(Cyprinidae) on its prey (Daphnia pulex) was studied in a series of laboratory experiments with varying densities (0, 350, 700, 1400, 2100 and 2800 stems m−2) of simulated submerged vegetation. Prey availability was varied from 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 and 25.0 prey l−1. As the stem density increased, the predator's swimming speed and the number of prey captured decreased relative to feeding in open water. A good relation existed between the number of successful prey captures and swimming speed with the average stem distance to fish body length ratio (D). An abrupt reduction in feeding and swimming was recorded when D was reduced to values less than one.
Hydrobiologia – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 16, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.