Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Snapp, P. Mafongoya, S. Waddington (1998)
Organic matter technologies for integrated nutrient management in smallholder cropping systems of southern AfricaAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 71
C. Wortmann, L. Lunze, V. Ochwoh, J. Lynch (2010)
Bean improvement for low fertility soils in AfricaAfrican Crop Science Journal, 3
L. Sperling, M. Loevinsohn, Beatrice Ntabomvura (1993)
Rethinking the Farmer's Role in Plant Breeding: Local Bean Experts and On-station Selection in RwandaExperimental Agriculture, 29
(1996)
Applying farmer participatory research methods to planning agricultural research: Experiences from Eastern Africa
(1992)
The adverse nutrition effects of taxing export crops in Malawi. Cornell Food and Nutrition Policy Program, Working paper No
M. Ahmed, D. Rohrbach, P. Services (1997)
Soil fertility management in communal areas of Zimbabwe: current practices, constraints, and opportunities for change
F. Ghassali, P. Cocks, A. Osman, G. Gintzburger, S. Christiansen, A. Semaan, M. Leybourne (1999)
Rehabilitation of degraded grasslands in north Syria: use of farmer participatory research to encourage the sowing of annual pasture legumesExperimental Agriculture, 35
(1998)
Phosphorus and sustainability of sub-Saharan Africa smallholder farms
S. Snapp (1998)
Soil nutrient status of smallholder farms in MalawiCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29
G. Kanyama-Phiri, S. Snapp, B. Kamanga, K. Wellard (2000)
Towards integrated soil fertility management in Malawi: incorporating participatory approaches in agricultural research.
S. Snapp, V. Aggarwal, R. Chirwa (1998)
Note on phosphorus and cultivar enhancement of biological nitrogen fixation and productivity of maize/bean intercrops in MalawiField Crops Research, 58
(1999)
Mother and baby trials: A novel trial design being tried out in Malawi
J. Witcombe (1999)
Do Farmer-Participatory Methods Apply More to High Potential Areas Than to Marginal Ones?Outlook on Agriculture, 28
T. Defoer, H. Groote, T. Hilhorst, S. Kanté, A. Budelman (1998)
Participatory action research and quantitative analysis for nutrient management in southern Mali : a fruitful marriage?Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 71
R. Chambers, B. Ghildyal (1985)
Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers: The farmer-first-and-last modelAgricultural Administration, 20
N. Ae, J. Arihara, K. Okada, T. Yoshihara, C. Johansen (1990)
Phosphorus Uptake by Pigeon Pea and Its Role in Cropping Systems of the Indian SubcontinentScience, 248
M. Versteeg, V. Koudokpon (1993)
Participative farmer testing of four low external input technologies, to address soil fertility decline in Mono province (Benin)Agricultural Systems, 42
K. Heong, M. Escalada (1999)
Quantifying rice farmers' pest management decisions: beliefs and subjective norms in stem borer controlCrop Protection, 18
R. Willey, N. Mohammed, S. Morse (1997)
Factors affecting compensation in intercropping when one component failsTropical Agriculture, 74
R. Kolli, C. Bantilan (1997)
Gender-related impacts of improved agricultural technologies: identification of indicators from a case study.Gender, technology and development, 1 3
K. Katayama, O. Ito, R. Matsunaga, J. Adu-Gyamfi, T. Rao, M. Anders, K. Lee (1995)
Nitrogen balance and root behavior in four pigeonpea-based intercropping systemsFertilizer research, 42
C. Okali, J. Sumberg, K. Reddy (1994)
Unpacking a Technical Package: Flexible Messages for Dynamic SituationsExperimental Agriculture, 30
A. Ferguson (1994)
Gendered Science: A Critique of Agricultural DevelopmentAmerican Anthropologist, 96
L. Kitch, O. Boukar, C. Endondo, L. Murdock (1998)
FARMER ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA IN BREEDING COWPEAExperimental Agriculture, 34
Improved varieties of legumes adapted to nutrient deficiency have the potential to improve food security for the poorest farmers. Tolerant varieties could be an inexpensive and biologically smart technology that improves soils while minimizing fertilizer costs. Yet other technologies that improve productivity and appear to be biologically sound have been rejected by farmers. To translate benefits to smallholder farmers, research on low-nutrient tolerant genes and crop improvement must keep farmer preferences and belief systems in the forefront. We review farmer participatory research on legume-intensification and soil fertility management options for smallholder farmers in Africa, including recent results from our work in Malawi and Kenya. We suggest that indeterminate, long-duration legumes are the best bet for producing high quality residues, compared to short-duration and determinate genotypes. This may be due to a long period of time to biologically fix nitrogen, acquire nutrients, photosynthesize and grain fill. Also, the indeterminate nature of long-duration varieties facilitates recovery from intermittent stresses such as drought or pest pressure. However, indeterminate growth habit is also associated with late maturity, moderate yield potential and high labour demand. These traits are not necessarily compatible with smallholder criteria for acceptable varieties. Malawi women farmers, for example, prioritized early maturity and low-labour requirement, as well as yield potential. To address complex farmer requirements, we suggest the purposeful combination of species with different growth habits; e.g. deep-rooted indeterminate long-duration pigeonpea interplanted with short-duration soyabean and groudnut varieties. On-farm trials in Malawi indicate that calorie production can be increased by 30% through pigeonpea-intensified systems. Farmers consistently indicate strong interest in these systems. In Kenya, a 55% yield increase was observed for a doubled-up pigeonpea system (a double row of pigeonpea intercropped with three maize rows) compared to traditional, low density intercrops. However, the need for improved pigeonpea varieties with high intercrop suitability, including reduced early branching, was highlighted by a farmer preference study in the same area. These examples illustrate the potential for participatory research methodologies to drive biophysical research in farmer-acceptable directions.
Plant and Soil – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.