Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1960)
WESTERBEKE : Differences in central antieholinergic actions of phenothiazine derivatives
James Olds, P. Milner (1954)
Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 47 6
(1959)
H~DLIK: Double blind comparison of clinical effects of imipramine and propazepine. (In Czech.) Aetiv
(1962)
Elektrophysiologische Analyse der Wirkungen verschiedener Neuroleptica ( Chlorpromazin , Reserpin , Tofranil , Meprobamat )
(1959)
MIJ ~ ISKA : Bewertung yon Tiefe und Liinge der Narkose nach den elektrophysiologischen Eigenschaften der GroBhirnrinde
M. Fink (1959)
Electroencephalographic and Behavioral Effects of TofrānilThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 4
(1957)
New methods for evaluating stimulants and antidepressants
R. Kuhn (1957)
[Treatment of depressive states with an iminodibenzyl derivative (G 22355)].Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift, 87 35-36
(1956)
Cm STtr ~ PE : Wechselwirkungen zwischen Physostigmin einerseits and Evipan , Procain , Largactil und Scopolamin anderseits anf die rhinencephale Tiitigkeit des Kaninchens
(1960)
HORXKOu ] ~ ber pharmakologiseh interessante Aminoalkyldcrivate yon Aeridanund Phenothiazinhomologen
W. Meter, Helen Owens, H. Himwich (1959)
Effects of Tofrānil, an Antidepressant Drug, on Electrical Potentials of Rabbit BrainThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 4
F. Brücke, S. Sailer, C. Stumpf (2004)
Wechselwirkungen zwischen Physostigmin einerseits und Evipan, Procain, Largactil und Scopolamin andererseits auf die rhinencephale Tätigkeit des KaninchensNaunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 232
Richard White, L. Boyajy (1959)
Comparison of Physostigmine and Amphetamine in Antagonizing the EEG Effects of GNS Depressants.∗Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 102
J. Metyšová, Z. Yotava (1961)
51 Pharmacological action of a new antidepressant drug, propazepine, in comparison with imipramineBiochemical Pharmacology, 8
M. Monnier, P. Krupp (1959)
[Electrophysiological analysis of the effects of various neuroleptics (chlorpromazine, reserpine, tofranil, meprobamate)].Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift, 89
M. Protiva, M. Borovička, V. Hach, Z. Votava, J. Šrámková, Z. Horáková (1957)
Über pharmakodynamisch interessante Aminoalkylderivate von Acridan- und PhenthiazinhomologenExperientia, 13
R. White, E. Westerbeke (1961)
Differences in central anticholinergic actions of phenothiazine derivatives.Experimental neurology, 4
James Olds, R. Travis, R. Schwing (1960)
Topographic organization of hypothalamic self-stimulation functions.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 53
(1962)
BoYAJY : Comparison of physostigmine and amphetamine in antagonizing the EEG effects of CNS depressants
L. Stein, J. Seifter (1961)
Possible Mode of Antidepressive Action of ImipramineScience, 134
(1954)
Sc ~ rwI ~ G : Topographic organisation of hypothalamie selfstimulation functions
White Rp, Boyajy Ld (1960)
Neuropharmacological comparison of atropine, scopolamine, banactyzine, diphenhydramine and hydroxyzine.Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de thérapie, 127
213 3 3 6 6 O. Benešová Z. Bohdanecký Z. Votava Department of Pharmacology Medical College of Hygiene and Research Institute for Pharmacy and Biochemistry Prague CSSR Summary Imipramine and its structural isomer propazepine were compared using 3 electrophysiological methods with these results: 1. EEG records in cortical and subcortical areas (hippocampus, thalamus) in rabbits with implanted electrodes after the administration of both drugs (5 mg/kg i.v.) did not differ. Imipramine had a greater antagonistic effect to cortical desynchronisation and subcortical synchronisation evoked by physostigmine (0,1 mg/kg i.V.). 2. The potentiation of thiopental anaesthesia measured by motor thresholds in rabbits with permanent epidural electrodes was greater after the administration of propazepine (2,5 mg/kg i.V.). 3. Imipramine (1 mg/kg, 1,5 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg i.p.) decreased the rate of self-stimulation in rats with electrodes implanted in ventrolateral hypothalamus, whilst propazepine in the dose of 1,5 mg/kg i.p. caused a significant increase in the rate of self-stimulation on the second day and in the dose of 2 mg/kg i.p. a significant decrease on the first day after the administration. The results are discussed in respect to the clinical use.
Psychopharmacology – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 1, 1962
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.