Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Diamond (1996)
Is the Third Wave Over?Journal of Democracy, 7
F. Volpi (2004)
Pseudo‐democracy in the Muslim worldThird World Quarterly, 25
H. Ersel (2013)
Politico-Economic Development of Turkey and The Transformation of Political Islam
Haldun Gülalp (1999)
POLITICAL ISLAM IN TURKEY: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE REFAH PARTYMuslim World, 89
Levent Köker (1995)
Local Politics and Democracy in Turkey: An AppraisalThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 540
A. Çarkoğlu (1997)
The Turkish general election of 24 December 1995Electoral Studies, 16
J. Haynes (1997)
Religion, secularisation and politics: A postmodern conspectusThird World Quarterly, 18
N. Bermeo (1997)
Myths of Moderation: Confrontation and Conflict during Democratic TransitionsComparative politics, 29
Özgür Ulus (2010)
The Army and the Radical Left in Turkey: Military Coups, Socialist Revolution and Kemalism
V. Key (1955)
A Theory of Critical ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 17
D. Rustow (1985)
Elections and Legitimacy in the Middle EastThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 482
Michele Angrist (2004)
Party Systems and Regime Formation in the Modern Middle East: Explaining Turkish ExceptionalismComparative politics, 36
E. Bellin (2004)
The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative PerspectiveComparative politics, 36
Frank Tachau (2000)
Turkish political parties and elections: Half a century of multiparty democracyTurkish Studies, 1
Birol Yesilada (1988)
Problems of Political Development in the Third Turkish RepublicPolity, 21
D. Rustow (1970)
Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic ModelComparative politics, 2
Jacob Landau (1985)
Ali Kazancıgil, Ergun Özbudun, eds; Atatürk founder of a modern state, London, C. Hurst & Co., 1981
H. Ersel (2013)
Politico-Economic Developments in Turkey and the Transformation of Political Islam (1950–2010)Middle East Development Journal, 5
Sencer Ayata (1996)
Patronage, party, and state: The politicization of Islam in TurkeyMiddle East Journal, 50
S. Kalyvas (2000)
Commitment problems in emerging democracies. The case of religious parties.Comparative politics, 32
Şaban Tanıyıcı (2003)
Transformation of Political Islam in TurkeyParty Politics, 9
Gökhan Çetinsaya (1999)
RETHINKING NATIONALISM AND ISLAM: SOME PRELIMINARY NOTES ON THE ROOTS OF “TURKISH‐ISLAMIC SYNTHESIS” IN MODERN TURKISH POLITICAL THOUGHTMuslim World, 89
M. Yavuz (1997)
Political Islam and the welfare (Refah) party in TurkeyComparative politics, 30
D. Collier, S. Levitsky (1997)
Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative ResearchWorld Politics, 49
Taha Parla, A. Davison (2004)
Corporatist Ideology in Kemalist Turkey: Progress Or Order?
A. Yıldız (2003)
Politico‐Religious Discourse of Political Islam in Turkey: The Parties of National OutlookMuslim World, 93
Ş. Mardin (2005)
Turkish Islamic Exceptionalism Yesterday and Today: Continuity, Rupture and Reconstruction in Operational CodesTurkish Studies, 6
M. Posusney (2004)
Enduring Authoritarianism: Middle East Lessons for Comparative TheoryComparative politics, 36
Ziya Öniş (1997)
The political economy of Islamic resurgence in Turkey: The rise of the Welfare Party in perspectiveThird World Quarterly, 18
M. Hakanyavuz (1999)
THE ASSASSINATION OF COLLECTIVE MEMORY: THE CASE OF TURKEYMuslim World, 89
[This chapter seeks to analyze the two elections constituting landmarks in the rise of political Islam to power in Turkey: the 1994 municipal elections and the 2002 general elections. The Welfare Party (RP) captured the greater city municipalities such as Istanbul and Ankara in the 1994 municipal elections in. İn the 2002 general elections, the collapse of the three-party coalition of the Democratic Left Party (DSP), Motherland Party (ANAP), and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP) brought the Justice and Development Party (AKP) to power. Hitherto it has widely been argued that the rise of political Islam owes to a deep antagonism between the “center” and “periphery.” According to this view, Kemalist regime mainly identified with centralist civil-military bureaucracy and political elite, and the traditional opposition mainly identified with various forms of Sunni Islam. In this configuration, the center has been regarded as a “unified core” and the Sunni Islam has been considered as a “peripheral movement.”]
Published: Nov 25, 2015
Keywords: European Union; Middle East; Political Elite; Coalition Government; Local Election
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.