Rationale: Although all of the benzodiazepines in use for the treatment of anxiety are presumably full agonists, it is conceivable that partial benzodiazepine agonists may also be clinically effective on the basis of their effects in preclinical models of anxiety. Objectives: To compare the anxiolytic-like effects of different pharmacological/chemical classes of partial benzodiazepine agonists in the pigeon conflict procedure. Methods: Anticonflict effects in pigeons whose responding was maintained under a multiple FR30 food:FR30 food+shock schedule were characterized by 1) the magnitude of punished responding or 2) the percentage of pigeons ( n =5–7/dose) showing significant increases in punished responding. Results: The partial allosteric modulators bretazenil and imidazenil produced anticonflict effects comparable with or superior to those observed following administration of the relatively full agonist midazolam. In contrast, neither the β-carbolines CGS 9896, ZK 95962 and ZK 91296, nor the imidazopyridines, alpidem and zolpidem, produced anticonflict effects comparable to either bretazenil and imidazenil or the relatively full benzodiazepine agonist, midazolam, at the doses examined in this study. Conclusions: Although the β-carboline ZK 95962 produced some anticonflict effects, none of the other compounds had anxiolytic-like effects like those observed with midazolam, bretazenil or imidazenil. However, because bretazenil and imidazenil produced robust anticonflict activity, the results indicate that partial allosteric modulators could have anxiolytic effects similar to those produced by higher efficacy compounds. Altogether, the results indicate that partial benzodiazepine agonists differ in their ability to produce robust anticonflict effects in the pigeon.
Psychopharmacology – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 1999
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera